David later refuses to pay the license fee due Inet because he claims his electronic signature and information were not authentic. Inet sues David to recover the license fee. Is David’s electronic signature enforceable against him? Explain your answer.

David later refuses to pay the license fee due Inet because he claims his electronic signature and information were not authentic. Inet sues David to recover the license fee. Is David’s electronic signature enforceable against him? Explain your answer.

Similar questions

Jackson is a car purchasing agent for Highway Motors, a used car dealer. Jackson attends wholesale auto auctions and notices that some autos have consistently greater demand and higher prices. Jackson forms a car purchasing partnership with Viva Inc. to buy these cars from "for sale by owner" advertisements and then sell them in Viva's name at the auto auctions where Jackson purchases them for Highway. Discuss if Jackson has violated any duty he owes Highway Motors.
An employer under the union contract has the right to demand a back to work slip from a doctor to allow an employee back to work after three days absence. The employee brings a slip from his doctor dated the morning before his return to work saying, “This employee is physically able to return to work. Discuss whether the employee has met his obligation.
Buyer Bert can't believe that Seller Sam has had a last-second change of heart about entering into an agreement to sell his home to Bert. Sam has offered to refund Bert's earnest money and even pay him something in acknowledgment of Bert's inconvenience and disappointment, but Bert's not having it. He wants Sam's house. Choose the remedy for breach of trust that Bert will most likely take. demand specific performance initiate rescission accept compensatory damages settle for liquidated damages
A man named Bob Smith believes that he is Santa Claus (who delivers presents to all the children around the world on Christmas Eve). In fact, he is not Santa, but he has believed this for many years. He signs his name "Santa." He signs many contracts as "Santa," and he refers to his wife as "Mrs. Claus" even though her name is actually Betty Smith. She puts up with it, because he really does believe he is Santa, and because she loves him and because his wages from his job at Hasbro toys pays the bills. One day he enters a contract with your company to hire you to build him a gigantic workshop in his backyard so he can build his toys and stable his "eight tiny reindeer." In return he will pay you $120,000 for the construction. When his wife learns of this deal, she tries to reject it because it is voidable due to his lack of contractual capacity. Was this contract voidable, or valid and enforceable? Answer the questions.
:Unsolicited Merchandise: Are there certain circumstances in which a person receiving unsolicited merchandise should be required to return the merchandise to the sender if he or she does not wish to purchase it? What are some of the reasons that the federal government might wish to make no exceptions to the rule freeing consumers of any liability for failing to return unsolicited merchandise?
On March 3rd 2009, the Fraud Examination Team, a department of the Bureau of Fraud Examination, received a call from Anton Valukas, chairman of the Chicago law firm Jenner & Block LLP. In early 2009, a bankruptcy court in New York assigned Valukas to investigate and report on the causes of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LBHI)[1]’s 2008 bankruptcy. During this investigation, Valukas came across “Repo 105” and “Repo 108” transactions that Lehman used from 2001 to 2008. A “repo” or repurchase agreement is a form of short-term borrowing, whereby one party agrees to temporarily “sell” securities to another party at a specified price, while also committing to repurchase them at a future date, and at a usually higher preset price by the same buyer. While “repo” transactions are legal and are frequently used by investment banks as a means of obtaining short-term financing, Valukas stated that given the period of the fiscal year when these transactions were mostly conducted, as well as how…
Describe the workflow needed to authorize therapeutic under emergency use authorization
Michael built a calculator (which graphs) using plans Michael found posted on the internet, but he unreasonably didn’t follow the plans when he constructed the calculator. Michael then sold the calculator to Jack who was injured when the calculator exploded because it hadn’t been built according to the plans. After the explosion Jack was taken to the Hospital emergency room (“ER”) where he signed a consent form authorizing Dr. Joe, the ER doctor, to perform a surgical procedure called Surgery X. But, instead Dr. Joe performed Surgery Y, a different procedure than Surgery X. A. What cause(s) of action should Jack use if he sues Michael for Jack’s injuries. Discuss. B. Has Joe, the ER doctor, committed any intentional torts? If so, discuss.
A sales representative in a shopping centre handed Karl a flyer promoting a style cut and shave for $12 at Lion’s Mane Barber Shop. As he was actually in need of a haircut and shave, Karl dropped by the barber shop, which was also located in the same shopping centre. When he arrived at the shop and presented his flyer to one of the barbers, he was told that there had been an error in the statement of price on the flyer - it was supposed to be $22 and not $12. The shop manager tried to convince Karl that this was still a bargain price given that a style cut and shave would normally cost $30 in other barbershops. Karl got upset, as he passed by two other barbershops in the same shopping centre that sold haircuts and shaves for $20 to $25. If he had known about the supposed mistake in the Lion’s Mane flyer, he wouldn’t have bothered coming to the shop. Answer the following: Does Karl have any legal grounds to claim the price of $12? Would your answer be different if Karl already…
help
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has banned Mr Wang Can, a former licensed representative of China Galaxy International Securities (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (CGIS), for 30 months for misconduct (Note 1). The SFC found that Wang asked his friend to open a securities account in September 2014 and conducted personal trading in that account for at least nine months. Wang became privy to information regarding a proposed acquisition of Linmark Group Limited (Linmark) in November 2014 when he assisted CGIS to prepare pre-engagement documentation for a potential client. He went on to purchase shares of Linmark through his friend's account and sold them two days after Linmark announced the proposed acquisition on 3 December 2014 and made a profit of $7,800 (Note 2). Wang breached CGIS' staff dealing policy by failing to disclose to his then employer his personal trading activities and beneficial interests in his friend's account. He also breached CGIS's staff dealing policy in that…
Arthur owns a property with a large back yard that is usually lit at night by bright floodlights. For months he has been asking local teenagers to stop using his yard as a ‘short-cut’ to the bus stop, but they continue to ignore him. Arthur decides to install an in-ground swimming pool. Last Saturday night, after the pool contractor has spent the day excavating a large hole, Arthur decided not to switch on the floodlights. At 11 pm, one of the teenagers, Gerry, fell into the hole and suffered serious injuries. Explain whether Arthur is likely to be liable in negligence. (Explain the operation of the Australian legal systems and processes relevant to contract and consumer law, including basic principles of the law of torts, particularly relating to negligence and negligent misstatement).