Leonardo has a house on the beach in California. The state wants to expand public beaches and subsequently takes Leonardo’s house, paying him $20,000 even though the house is worth $500,000. Leonardo can argue (A) that his First Amendment rights were violated; (B) that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated; (C) that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated; (D) that his Tenth Amendment rights were violated. Answer:______ Explanation: Only typing answer

Leonardo has a house on the beach in California. The state wants to expand public beaches and subsequently takes Leonardo’s house, paying him $20,000 even though the house is worth $500,000. Leonardo can argue (A) that his First Amendment rights were violated; (B) that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated; (C) that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated; (D) that his Tenth Amendment rights were violated. Answer:______ Explanation: Only typing answer

Similar questions

Should the public have taken more of a stance against his actions? If so, what action(s) could the public have taken? If not, give reasons why the public should not involve itself in such situations. Should the government have taken any action in this situation, given that the CEO was making a point against legislation it had introduced? If so, explain the action that you believe the government should have taken. If not, explain why you do not believe any government action is justified.
need help asap
Part 1. Eric has applied for the position of a reservations clerk in your hotel. The individual has no experience, but he types quickly and accurately and has good listening skills as well as a pleasant speaking voice. Eric has very limited eyesight. He is considered to be "legally blind" and is covered by ADA. Discuss ways in which management in your hotel could accommodate Eric's disability with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in 1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes is about interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail? O It depends on the jurisdiction. O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue. O The federal statute, because it is newer. O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause. O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.
Moises and Rutledge are discussing their views on the law. Moises believes that people should give up some of their rights to the government, but they should be able to retain other inalienable rights. Rutledge believes that the law is a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state which commands what is right and prohibits what is wrong. Kilroy overhears their conversation and jumps in with his own belief, saying that the law is a social construct that should provide stability. order, and security. He also said that he believes people should relinquish all of their rights to the state. Which philosophers would agree with Moises, Rutledge, and Kilroy, respectively? O Montesquieu, Hobbes, Locke O Blackstone, Hobbes, Montesquieu O Locke, Blackstone, Hobbes O Montesquieu, Blackstone, Hobbes O Locke, Montesquieu, Blackstone
Louisa, who is not a real estate license holder, owns three single-family residences, which she rents out. (She does not occupy any of the residences). Does she have to abide by the Fair Housing Act when selecting tenants? Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act, although she may not use discriminatory advertising. Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act under the Mrs. Murphy exemption. Louisa is not exempt from the Fair Housing Act. Louisa is not exempt under the Fair Housing Act, but she is exemptunder the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.
The U.S Supreme Court requires that any condemned property must be put into use for the general public. True False
Please answer this very simple question displayed with the image above
Recording Under an Accident and Health policy, which of the following persons has the right to change the beneficiary? O A. Applicant Insured O B. O C. O D. Beneficiary Policyowner Chat Whiteboard Code 372-256-906
A Question of Ethics—Copyright Infringement.Custom Copies, Inc., prepares and sells coursepacks,which contain compilations of readings for collegecourses. A teacher selects the readings and delivers asyllabus to the copy shop, which obtains the materialsfrom a library, copies them, and binds the copies. Blackwell Publishing, Inc., which owns the copyright to some of the materials,filed a suit, alleging copyright infringement. Custom Copies fileda motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [ Blackwell Publishing, Inc. v. Custom Copies, Inc., 2006 WL 1529503(N.D.Fla. 2006)] (See Copyrights.)(a) Custom Copies argued, in part, that creating and sellingdid not “distribute” the coursepacks. Does a copy shopviolate copyright law if it only copies materials for coursepacks? Does the copying fall under the “fair use” exception? Should the court grant the defendant’s motion?Why or why not?(b) What is the potential impact of copying and selling a bookor journal without the permission of, and…
In eminent domain cases, an individual private party may not benefit from the government's taking of private property for a public purpose. True False
John works as an engineer for a technological company, and Maria works as a sales executive for a competitor business. Maria reminded John that her profession contains sensitive information, and she cautions him not to reveal anything he learns from her work to anyone. While attending a conference, John overheard two executives from Maria's company discussing a new product launch. He chooses to buy a modest amount of Maria's company's shares, intending to profit from the predicted increase in the company's stock price following the product launch. John double-checked his company's regulations to ensure that there was no conflict of interest or limitation on the purchase. However, as a result of unanticipated factors, the product introduction was delayed, and the stock price of Maria's company fell instead. Instead of the predicted profit, John's investment resulted in a loss. Question : In the view of conflict of interest of ethics in financial analysis, state the key points of the…