ugly and told Raven that she "looked silly" in them. Raven was extremely offended by Setareh's statement, and decided to sue. Setareh admits that the incident occurred, but believes there are no grounds for a case to be made. What is Setareh's best course of action to avoid liability under this lawsuit? O File a motion for summary judgement. File a motion or other pleading seeking to have a jury trial. O File a notice as to the service of process. File a declaration contending the absence of default. O File a motion to dismiss.

ugly and told Raven that she "looked silly" in them. Raven was extremely offended by Setareh's statement, and decided to sue. Setareh admits that the incident occurred, but believes there are no grounds for a case to be made. What is Setareh's best course of action to avoid liability under this lawsuit? O File a motion for summary judgement. File a motion or other pleading seeking to have a jury trial. O File a notice as to the service of process. File a declaration contending the absence of default. O File a motion to dismiss.

Similar questions

Girly will have the burden of "going forward," meaning that she has to establish the elements of her claim. If she meets the "prima facie claim," then the defendant MMLP will have the burden that the actions taken against Girly were for a legal reason. If MMLP can meet this burden, the burden then shifts back to Girly to prove that the reason MMLP gave is a pretext (or coverup) for discrimination. (See Chapter 21, p.454) 1. Sexual Discrimination: Does Girly have a via claim for intentional sexual discrimination, that is that she is being treated differently based on her gender? Reference specific facts from the case and apply them to the law to reach your final opinion. 2. Sexual Harassment: Does Girly have a viable claim of sexual harassment against MMLP based on "quid pro quo" sexual harassment OR hostile working environment. Both types are discussed in your text.
Federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and HIPPA, apply to claims handling and to the professional activities of the claims representative. True False
Henry is driving his car when suddenly the brakes fail. He is unable to stop and crashes into a motor cycle ridden by Susan who is not wearing an helmet. The motor cycle is damaged and Susan is severely injured. Using at least two decided cases, advice all parties of their legal positions in civil law. B. Distinguish between assault and battery. Use appropriate examples and case law to substantiate your answer.
Francine posts on social media that she will pay $500 to anyone who will clear her lawn of leaves. One of Francine's friends is dating Bob, who goes out and collects all the leaves. When he asks for payment, Francine says that the two never had a contract. Is Francine correct? Briefly explain.
Renee protests in front of a law firm's office building because she is convinced that one of the firm's lawyers horribly mistreated her. Renee tells a potential client who is entering the firm. "don't waste your time"; and she also implores that this person "seek another lawyer because the associate lawyer who represented me was and is a jerk." The potential client walks in anyway, as do many other customers. The law firm sues Renee and asks the court to grant injunctive relief that is, to stop Renee from protesting in front of its office building. Is the claim likely to succeed? O No, because the statement does not defame the business or prevent customers from being able to visit the business. Yes, because there is no absolute right to protest against a privately-owned business. O Yes, because the potential client unable to secure legal advice due to the protests. O No, because Renee has a First Amendment right to say whatever she wants about the business. O Yes, because Renee's…
If a person was found guilty for assault and battery in a criminal case, and the person that was hurt brings a civil action against the defendant, does a full trial have to be held again or can the jury just accept the fact that the defendant committed the act?
Leonardo has a house on the beach in California. The state wants to expand public beaches and subsequently takes Leonardo’s house, paying him $20,000 even though the house is worth $500,000. Leonardo can argue (A) that his First Amendment rights were violated; (B) that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated; (C) that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated; (D) that his Tenth Amendment rights were violated. Answer:______ Explanation: Only typing answer
In order to prove disparate treatment employment discrimination under Title VII, what is the first showing a plaintiff must make? Multiple Choice The plaintiff would provde beyond a reasonable doubt that discrimination occured. The plaintiff would show that the reason given by the employer for the discrimination was a mere pretext. The plaintiff would demonstrate a prima facie case of discrimination. The plaintiff would show that the plaintiff gave the defendant the opportunity to remedy the situation before filing suit but that the defendant refused. The plaintiff would show that other people were also being discrirminated against.
Rose is recovering from recent abdominal surgery and is suffering from intense pain. She has an MRI, which shows surgical gauze left in her abdomen. Rose may sue under O O O O a. strict liability. b. res ipsa loquitur. c. product liability. d. an intentional tort.
Rim Corporation makes tire rims that it sells to Superior Vehicles, Inc., which installs them on cars. One set ofrims is defective, which an inspection would reveal. Superior does not inspect the rims. The car with the defectiverims is sold to Town Auto Sales, which sells the car toUri. Soon, the car is in an accident caused by the defective rims, and Uri is injured. Is Superior Vehicles liable?Explain your answer. (See Strict Product Liability.)
James W. Newton, Jr., is an accomplished avant-garde jazz composer and flutist. Newton wrote a composition for the song “Choir,” a piece for flute and voice that incorporated elements of African American gospel music. Newton owns the copyright to the composition “Choir.” The Beastie Boys, a rap and hip-hop group, used six seconds of Newton’s “Choir” composition in their song “Pass the Mic” without obtaining a license from Newton to do so. Newton sued the Beastie Boys for copyright infringement. The Beastie Boys defended, arguing that their use of six seconds of Newton’s song was de minimis and therefore fair use. Does the incorporation of a short segment of a copyrighted musical composition into a new musical recording constitute fair use, or is it copyright infringement? Explain your answer.
Now explain what would be Harvey's best argument in response to the argument on provocation? In other words, argue on behalf of Harvey that there was no provocation of the dog. (Messa v. Sullivan)