Answered: A tort is: Group of answer choices a… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

A tort is: Group of answer choices a violation of a duty imposed by civil law. a crime punishable by a year in prison. only applies when there is an intentional injury. None of the above.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Patricia has a contract with Sandy for personal services. Sandy breaches the contract and Patricia sues. The judge rules that Patricia’s contract with Sandy is unenforceable due to it being “Unconscionable.” What does that mean?
The statute of limitations in Texas is a.four years for a written contract. b.four years for an oral contract for a 6-month lease. c.four years for all contracts for the sale or lease of real property in Texas. d.six years for a written contract.
Bill is a technician at a university chemistry lab and is in charge of safety inspections and prevention of injury due to faulty equipment. One morning, as a result of his inspection, Bill discovers a gas burner with a broken valve. Bill gets distracted and fails to put an “OUT OF ORDER/DO NOT USE” sign on the faulty burner. When the morning class arrives, Halle uses the faulty burner and is burned when it catches fire. Bill’s negligence is based on: nonfeasance. misfeasance. negligence per se. res ipsa loquitur. A person cannot be guilty of negligence if he or she has no duty owed to the plaintiff. True False Jessica was caught shoplifting at a department store both by employees who witnessed the act and by cameras in the store. The store’s management may hold her as long as it takes to get her to confess. True False he highest and most comprehensive duty owed by a landowner to a person on the owner’s property is owed to: an invitee. a licensee. an…
Can you please help me answer this?
Kayla, a property owner, loses an acre of her land to adverse possession. She is surprised this was even possible. You explain to her that, even though she owns the property, property can be lost even without the owner's consent through: involuntary alienation voluntary alienation private grants land trust
Mr Grump is a former employee of Fashion retail store. He was recently dismissed on grounds of committing misconduct in the workplace. Mr Grump, being very resentful over his dismissal, decided to exact revenge. He contacted his best friend Mr Y who has knowledge on hacking. Mr Grump with the help of Mr Y hacked into the Fashion online financial systems and erased important digital data. Determine whether the Fashion retail store can institute legal action, and if so, on what grounds. Make reference to relevant case law and legislation in your answer.
A tort is a breach of a contractual agreement Select one: True False Clear my choice O O
Louisa, who is not a real estate license holder, owns three single-family residences, which she rents out. (She does not occupy any of the residences). Does she have to abide by the Fair Housing Act when selecting tenants? Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act, although she may not use discriminatory advertising. Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act under the Mrs. Murphy exemption. Louisa is not exempt from the Fair Housing Act. Louisa is not exempt under the Fair Housing Act, but she is exemptunder the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.
Please answer this very simple question displayed with the image above
Acme Co. does not want to install an elevator in their building to provide access to a second floor storage loft since only one of their seventy-five employees might need elevator access. Acme's best defense to a charge of discrimination would be _____. infrequency of use undue hardship unreasonable accommodation undue expense
Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issue
Lucy cannot stand the fact that her ex-husband, Ethan, is about to get remarried. After all, it was a horrible breakup, and Ethan was really mean to her. Lucy decides to get her revenge by telling Ethan’s employer that Ethan stole large amounts of money from his previous employer, even though Lucy knows it is not true. If Lucy follows through on her plan, she will have: a) not committed the tort of defamation because the statement would not harm Ethan’s reputation. b) committed the tort of defamation because it is an untrue statement intended to harm Ethan’s reputation, and she stated it to another person. c) not committed the tort of defamation, because she only made the statement to one person.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS