**Discussion on Law and Rights**Moises and Rutledge are discussing their views on the law. Moises believes that people should give up some of their rights to the government, but they should be able to retain other inalienable rights. Rutledge believes that the law is a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state which commands what is right and prohibits what is wrong. Kilroy overhears their conversation and jumps in with his own belief, saying that the law is a social construct that should provide stability, order, and security. He also said that he believes people should relinquish all of their rights to the state. **Question:** Which philosophers would agree with Moises, Rutledge, and Kilroy, respectively?**Options:**- Montesquieu, Hobbes, Locke- Blackstone, Hobbes, Montesquieu- Locke, Blackstone, Hobbes- Montesquieu, Blackstone, Hobbes- Locke, Montesquieu, Blackstone

The nature of law and government has been a subject of profound philosophical inquiry for centuries.…

Answered: Moises and Rutledge are discussing…

Similar questions

Honesty, lawfulness, and keeping promises, and adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations, define
In this chapter, we stated that the doctrine of stare decisis "became a cornerstone of the English and American judicial systems." What does stare decisis mean, and why has this doctrine been so fundamental to the development of our legal tradition? Also, what is the name commonly given to our legal tradition, as inherited from the English system?
Following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detail
Connor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?
Please answer this very simple question displayed with the image above
Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.
Sungsam, Inc., a Taiwanese company, and nineteen other Asian companies (the Companies) collaborated to manufacture and sell transistors internationally. These transistors were used in a multitude of consumer goods, millions of which were sold in the United States, including Georgia. The state of Georgia sued the Companies in Georgia, alleging violating consumer protection laws. The Companies filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, Plaintiff alleged that the Companies sold the transistors into international streams of commerce with the intent that they would be incorporated into millions of consumer products sold in the United States, including Georgia. Should the Companies motion be granted? © a. No because the Companies did not sell any products directly to Georgia consumers and did not conduct any business in Georgia. b. Yes because a foreign manufacturer’s placement of goods into the stream of commerce of the state of Georgia, with…
Explain your understanding of the following maxim of equity with the use of examples or scenarios Equity looks at the intent rather than the form Equity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights. Equity will not suffer wrong without a remedy.
Henry is driving his car when suddenly the brakes fail. He is unable to stop and crashes into a motor cycle ridden by Susan who is not wearing an helmet. The motor cycle is damaged and Susan is severely injured. Using at least two decided cases, advice all parties of their legal positions in civil law. B. Distinguish between assault and battery. Use appropriate examples and case law to substantiate your answer.
If a restaurant ignores health codes in violation of local, state, or federal environmental regulations, the resulting dispute focuses on law. public private consensual established preferential
If a person was found guilty for assault and battery in a criminal case, and the person that was hurt brings a civil action against the defendant, does a full trial have to be held again or can the jury just accept the fact that the defendant committed the act?
As exemplified in the photo below, in front of/atop courthouses worldwide stands or sits a statue of a woman, carrying a sword and measuring balances, sometimes wearing a blindfold, sometimes with eyes closed. Her sword stands for the power of the court, her scales for the competing claims of the petitioners, and her blindfold signifies that justice is meted out objectively, without fear or favor, regardless of identity, power, or weakness. Justice is blind so that justice is impartial. This characterization symbolizes the idea of (the) A) Democracy B) Imperialism C) Equality D) Rule of Law E) Rule of Man

SEE MORE QUESTIONS