The United States Supreme Court has ruled that it violates the Eighth Amendment for a juvenile (anyone who was under the age of 18 when they commited the crime) to face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The Court, however, said that it was the mandatory aspect of the sentence that violated the Eighth Amendment--states could still allow for a sentence of life without parole so long as the sentencing judge had to option to impose a lesser sentence. Some now argue that even allowing the option of life without parole for a juvenile violates the Eighth Amendment. Do you agree or disagree with this argument? Why?

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that it violates the Eighth Amendment for a juvenile (anyone who was under the age of 18 when they commited the crime) to face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The Court, however, said that it was the mandatory aspect of the sentence that violated the Eighth Amendment--states could still allow for a sentence of life without parole so long as the sentencing judge had to option to impose a lesser sentence. Some now argue that even allowing the option of life without parole for a juvenile violates the Eighth Amendment. Do you agree or disagree with this argument? Why?

Similar questions

Sungsam, Inc., a Taiwanese company, and nineteen other Asian companies (the Companies) collaborated to manufacture and sell transistors internationally. These transistors were used in a multitude of consumer goods, millions of which were sold in the United States, including Georgia. The state of Georgia sued the Companies in Georgia, alleging violating consumer protection laws. The Companies filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, Plaintiff alleged that the Companies sold the transistors into international streams of commerce with the intent that they would be incorporated into millions of consumer products sold in the United States, including Georgia. Should the Companies motion be granted? © a. No because the Companies did not sell any products directly to Georgia consumers and did not conduct any business in Georgia. b. Yes because a foreign manufacturer’s placement of goods into the stream of commerce of the state of Georgia, with…
in the Escobar case, Universal Health Services, Inc Petitioner v. United States and Massachusetts, es rel. Julio Escobar, April 19, 2016. This unit treated the relators’ allegations in this case as presenting legally false claims. Explain why the relators’ allegations in the case could actually be viewed as presenting factually false claims.
1-5. THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT. Sandra White operated a travel agency. To obtain lower airline fares for her nonmilitary clients, she booked military-rate travel by forwarding fake military identification cards to the airlines. The U.S. government charged White with identity theft, which requires the “use” of another’s identification. As background, the court in the White case had two cases that represented precedents. In the first case, David Miller obtained a loan to buy land by representing that certain investors had approved the loan when, in fact, they had not. Miller’s conviction for identity theft was overturned because he had merely said that the investors had done something when they had not. According to the court, this was not the “use” of another’s identification. In the second case, Kathy Medlock, an ambulance service operator, had transported patients for whom there was no medical necessity to do so. To obtain payment, Medlock had forged a physician’s signature. The court…
True or False In Kentucky, a defendant has 30 days to file an Answer once served with the lawsuit.
describing the commencement of either a civil or criminal proceeding and indicate how the case might ultimately be resolved of the Federal court system or within the NYS Court system
When an offender is a corporation, should the court use different sentencing criteria?Do you concur with Stewart, J., who rendered a decision in the United Keno Hill Mines case, regarding the pertinent factors to be taken into account in environmental cases?Do you believe the most beneficial "creative sentencing" clauses?Any sentencing guidelines that haven't been covered in the text, in your opinion?What do you believe would serve as the most potent deterrent?
If a person was found guilty for assault and battery in a criminal case, and the person that was hurt brings a civil action against the defendant, does a full trial have to be held again or can the jury just accept the fact that the defendant committed the act?
The central issues in Who Has Jurisdiction revolve around the criminal justice professional's ability to determine which offenses are state offenses and which are federal offenses, based on individual judgment and experience. Explain your choices in this scenario by addressing the following question. What components and facts must be considered in determining jurisdiction in the investigation and prosecution of a criminal action, and why?
What is the difference between specific intent and general intent in criminal law?
As exemplified in the photo below, in front of/atop courthouses worldwide stands or sits a statue of a woman, carrying a sword and measuring balances, sometimes wearing a blindfold, sometimes with eyes closed. Her sword stands for the power of the court, her scales for the competing claims of the petitioners, and her blindfold signifies that justice is meted out objectively, without fear or favor, regardless of identity, power, or weakness. Justice is blind so that justice is impartial. This characterization symbolizes the idea of (the) A) Democracy B) Imperialism C) Equality D) Rule of Law E) Rule of Man
A Greek yogurt maker owns and operates a production facility in Switzerland. Within the next six months, the Swiss government has stipulated that all local food producers must list the genetically modified ingredients (GMO) contained in the product on its packaging label. GMO foods or, as critics commonly call them, "Franken-foods," in honor of Frankenstein, use genetic material that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques in making the food. Companies are often reluctant to post this information, fearful that it might result in people choosing not to use their products. Although labeling of GMO products in the marketplace is required in 64 countries, many others, including Greece, do not impose this regulation. Interestingly, reporting this information on the label is not required in the United States and no distinction between marketing GMO and non-GMO foods are presently recognized by the United States’ Food and Drug Administration. Dealing with growing demand for…
Wisconsin passes a state law that bans all semi-trucks from carrying double-trailers on roads in our state (see picture below). The state's ostensible reason for passing the law is to reduce accidents on the road. Double-trailers a more likely to be involved in accidents than single-trailer semis. A national trade group representing freight companies sues the state, arguing that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. Would the state law violate the Dormant Commerce Clause? Explain your decision.