Answered: In eminent domain cases, an individual… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

In eminent domain cases, an individual private party may not benefit from the government's taking of private property for a public purpose.

True

False

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Bob, an engineer, is a new employee at Airbag Industries, which specializes in manufacturing automotive airbags. Before his employment, Bob is required to sign various documents indicating that he would have access to confidential information related to Airbag Industries' business practices, customer lists, and other information that must remain confidential. It further provided that any new developments created by Bob would be the property of Airbag Industries. Further, it provided that if Bob left the company he could not compete against the company in the United States for 10 years. Bob leaves three years later to set up his own airbag company. What intellectual property issues are involved in this scenario?
Please assist
What is the liability of the managers or owners of the establishment for the negligent act of their employees. What is an obligation under article 1156 of the civil code.
In Salman, the Supreme Court adopted the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation, finding that an insider-tipper receives a personal benefit where the tipper makes a gift of inside information to a trading relative or friend, and rejecting the additional requirements imposed by the Second Circuit in United States v. Newman. Critically, discuss Salman v. United States 1 580 U.S., 137 S. Ct. 420 (2016) as it relates to insider dealing in the USA. You are required to discuss the law before Salman, namely a review of the “Classical”, The “Misappropriation” Theory and the “Deceptive Device” or “Affirmative Misrepresentation” Theory and dicuss how it relates to the case. Did Salman establish a new precedent as it relate to insider dealing? Write a case analysis between 2000-3000 words.
Identify and explain the forms of intellectual property, how long protection of one's rights lasts, and what remedies one can seek for an infringement of one's IP (Intellectual Property).
This is BUSINESS LAW Question How does the company law protect the rights and interests of the persons who enter into business transactions with a company?
In what has been subsequently known as the 'narrow rule', the House of Lords found that a duty of care exist even if the defendant was not present. Accordingly, manufacturers of goods must take reasonable steps to ensure that their products do not cause injury to those that subsequently come into contact with them. Lord Atkin went on to propose a general maxim of law known as the 'neighbour principle' which would apply generally and preclude the claimant needing to bring the facts of their case within those of a previous case. REQUIRED: Concisely sets out what the claimant has to prove in order to succeed in an action in Negligence. 2. Comment on the situation where the chain of event is broken by an intervening cause.
under the NCC, what are the different acts or omissions of the obligor or debtor which will result in the breach of the obligation for which he can be held liable for damages?
Describe how and why businesses must factor in the legal environment when operating a business. Are contracts important and if so, why?
A corporation cannot be prosecuted for the commission of criminal acts. True or false?
You are President and CEO of Apex Business Systems, Inc. (Apex). Apex, through its purchasing agent, bought a new microwave from Inki Appliances Company (Inki) who sells microwaves on a daily basis. There was no written or oral warranty given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after it was placed it in the company kitchen. Assume also that nobody misused the microwave or in any way caused it to quit working. The purchasing agent returned the microwave three days after it quit working. The owner of Inki refused to repair or replace the microwave or offer a refund. Prepare a demand letter to be sent to Inki.
1. Basic Research LLC advertised its products on television networks owned by Rainbow Media Holdings Inc through an ad agency Icebox Advertising Inc. As Basic’s agent Icebox had express authority to buy ads from Rainbow on Basics behalf, but the authority was limited to buying ad with cash in advance. Despite this limit Rainbow sold ads to Basic through Icebox on credit. Basic paid Icebox for the ads, but Icebox did not pass all of the payments on to Rainbow. Icebox filed for bankruptcy. Can Rainbow recoup the unpaid amounts from Basic? Explain.2. Western Fire truck Inc contracted with Emergency One Inc (EO) to be its exclusive dealer in Wyoming and Colorado through Dec. 2003. James Costello, a Western Salesperson, was authorized to order EO vehicles for hi customers. Without informing Western, Costello emailed EO about Westerns diffuclties obtaining cash to fund its operations. He asked about the viability of Westerns contract and his possible employment with EO. On EO’s…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS