Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes isabout interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail?O It depends on the jurisdiction.O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue.O The federal statute, because it is newer.O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause.O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.

Option (A) is untrue since federal law, irrespective of jurisdiction, must take precedence in all…

Answered: Assume that there are two conflicting…

Similar questions

In 1975, after the war in Vietnam, the U.S. government discontinued draft registration for men in this country. In 1980, after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, President Jimmy Carter asked Congress for funds to reactivate draft registration. President Carter suggested that both males and females be required to register. Congress allocated funds only for the registration of males. Several men who were subject to draft registration brought a lawsuit that challenged the law as being unconstitutional, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the draft registration law, reasoning as follows: The question of registering women for the draft not only received considerable national attention and was the subject of wide-ranging public debate, but also was extensively considered by Congress in hearings, floor debate, and in committee. The foregoing clearly establishes that the decision to exempt women…
What is administrative law, and what is its role in the legal system? Explain the relationship between administrative agencies, the executive branch, and the judiciary.
The bars unfair treatment against women in employment based on childbirth or related conditions. a. Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 b. Protection of Life during Pregnancy Act 2013 C. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 d. Title VII of 1964 Civil Rights Act
In the context of the First Sale Doctrine (17 U.S.C. § 109), which statement accurately describes its application to the distribution and resale of copyrighted material? Note that we had this business case when we were studying Netflix during their before streaming DVD rental era. The First Sale Doctrine allows for the unlimited reproduction and distribution of copyrighted digital content without the need for permission from the copyright holder The First Sale Doctrine requires companies to obtain permission from the copyright holder for each rental or resale of a physical copy of digital content, limiting the availability of titles for companies like Netflix The First Sale Doctrine permits the resale or rental of physical copies of digital content, such as DVDs, without requiring authorization from the copyright holder, enabling companies like Netflix to offer a wide variety of titles The First Sale Doctrine only protects the resale or rental of purely digital copies,…
1. What is the full name of the Tribunal? What are the types of cases that are heard? 2. What is the complete citation for the enabling legislation? 3. Aside from the enabling legislation - list any other statutes this tribunal has the jurisdiction to interpret. 4. What year was this tribunal created? 5. Who are the usual parties who appear at this tribunal? 6. What is the name of the rules of procedure for this tribunal? 7. What is the website address for the tribunal? 8. Is this tribunal inquisitorial or adversarial in nature? 9. Is this tribunal subject to…
Which statement accurately describes the contrast between statutes and ordinances? O Ordinances involve white-collar crime, while statutes involve conventional crime. O Ordinances deal with local matters and statutes involve issues that impact the entire state or country. O Ordinances require a lower burden of proof compared to statutes. O Ordinances only involve civil law, while statutes only involve criminal law.
Substantive law defines and creates legal rights and obligations in such matters as real property, torts, crimes, family, and others. True or False
Charter of Rights and Freedoms In 1988, the federal government introduced a legislation, Tobacco Products Control Act, created in complete and total prohibition on all advertising and promotion of tobacco products in Canada. The act also required a health warning of a specific nature to be put on tobacco packaging and prohibited the manufacturers from putting any other information on those packages. The manufacturer challenged the legislation before the Supreme Court claiming that it interfered with the manufacturer’s right to freedom of expression section 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 1) Do Supreme Court has legal right to interpret the legislated law? 2) Does law infringe the freedom of expression of the charter? Please state your reasons.
In this chapter, we stated that the doctrine of stare decisis "became a cornerstone of the English and American judicial systems." What does stare decisis mean, and why has this doctrine been so fundamental to the development of our legal tradition? Also, what is the name commonly given to our legal tradition, as inherited from the English system?
Following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detail
Anthem, one of the largest healthcare insurers in the United States, implemented an“avoidable ER” policy to help manage the care of its enrollees. The policy stated thatAnthem would not pay for emergency room visits if the company determined that the visitwas not necessary. The policy, which was instituted in six states beginning in 2015, wasmeant to encourage patients to seek care in appropriate settings. However, providers feelthat this policy might cause patients to avoid emergency treatment, even when it isnecessary. In response to customer and provider complaints, Anthem created severalexceptions: Claims will be covered if a healthcare provider tells a patient to go to theemergency room, if the patient is under 15 years of age, if the patient is outside his or her state of residence, and if the patient had a CT scan or MRI or underwent surgery. Still,providers are unhappy with the policy (Livingston 2018).1-Why did Anthem implement this policy?
Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS