Answered: . Common law does not protect… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

. Common law does not protect confidential information and trade secrets in Canada. Critically assess the credibility of this statement based on Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574.

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

1. What is the full name of the Tribunal? What are the types of cases that are heard? 2. What is the complete citation for the enabling legislation? 3. Aside from the enabling legislation - list any other statutes this tribunal has the jurisdiction to interpret. 4. What year was this tribunal created? 5. Who are the usual parties who appear at this tribunal? 6. What is the name of the rules of procedure for this tribunal? 7. What is the website address for the tribunal? 8. Is this tribunal inquisitorial or adversarial in nature? 9. Is this tribunal subject to…
The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…
In US Supreme Court case O'Hagan v. United States (1997), O'Hagan was a lawyer working for Grand Met, a company that was secretly planning to make a tender offer for the stock of Pillsbury, the 'target' firm. O'Hagan bought call options on that stock before Grand Met offer went public. The misappropriation theory articulated by the Court's majority in this case is also called the theory of 'outsider' (rather than 'insider') trading. That is because 0'Hagan was not an insider of Pillsbury, the target. He was an outsider who did not owe a fiduciary duty to the shareholders of Pillsbury. The Court's majority held that he did, however, owe a fiduciary duty to Grand Met, the outside firm holding private material information releyant to the future value of Pillsbury stock.(T/F/U and Why?)
Olga, a resident of Maine, was recently injured by a defective product produced by Home Appliance Corporation, which is incorporated in Delaware but has its company headquarters in Virgina. Olga purchased the defective product in Maine. Olga is suing Home Appliance for $60,000. Which courts would have personal jurisdiction in this case? Would a federal court have jurisdiction? Why or why not?
Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in 1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes is about interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail? O It depends on the jurisdiction. O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue. O The federal statute, because it is newer. O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause. O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.
SMALL (08/20) 1. (a), (b), (c), or (d)? According to Michael Huemer, the prima facie right to immigrate to the United States is… (a) neutralized (b) overridden (c) neither neutralized nor overridden (d) both neutralized and overridden. 2. (a) or (b)? Ronald Cordero’s proposal is to… (a) impose a constraint on the labor market (b) remove a constraint on the labor market. Again, (a) or (b)? Cordero’s argument is (a) a moral one, to do with fairness (b) an economical one, to do with efficiency. 3. (a) or (b)? Michael Sandel’s “corruption” objection to certain markets is based on worries about (a) bribery (b) degradation.
None
You are President and CEO of Apex Business Systems, Inc. (Apex). Apex, through its purchasing agent, bought a new microwave from Inki Appliances Company (Inki) who sells microwaves on a daily basis. There was no written or oral warranty given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after it was placed it in the company kitchen. Assume also that nobody misused the microwave or in any way caused it to quit working. The purchasing agent returned the microwave three days after it quit working. The owner of Inki refused to repair or replace the microwave or offer a refund. Prepare a demand letter to be sent to Inki.
93. the Department of Financial Services may open an investigation on an individual O Being licensed in multiple lines of authority Holding a nonresident license in another state Engaging in the business of insurance without a license Sharing commissions with a similarly licensed individual COLCHREARE COLX
Using the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…
State and describe three (3) potentials grounds for overturning an NLRB election.
Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS