To which of the following will the general anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA apply: (1)A scheme that has a commercial purpose but which is “tax driven” (2)A scheme that depends on a tax benefit to give a commercial outcome. (3)A scheme that makes no commercial sense without the tax benefit. (4)A scheme that is explicable only by the tax benefit obtained. A.only(1) B.only (1) and (2) C.only (1),(2) and (3) D.All of (1)to(4) E.only (2),(3),(4) F.only (3),(4) G.only(4)

To which of the following will the general anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA apply: (1)A scheme that has a commercial purpose but which is “tax driven” (2)A scheme that depends on a tax benefit to give a commercial outcome. (3)A scheme that makes no commercial sense without the tax benefit. (4)A scheme that is explicable only by the tax benefit obtained. A.only(1) B.only (1) and (2) C.only (1),(2) and (3) D.All of (1)to(4) E.only (2),(3),(4) F.only (3),(4) G.only(4)

Similar questions

Pls help
Firm A is having financial difficulties. It delivers goods to a carrier for shipment to a foreign buyer, obtains a Bill of Lading (BOL), and negotiates the document to the buyer. In the meantime, a creditor of the seller attempts to put a lien on the goods to satisfy it debt. In this example whose property claim to the delivered goods will prevail? a. Firm A b. The buyer c. the creditor d. They have equal claims and the dispute needs to be submitted to court for final resolution
Wrong answer previous one
Pls help ASAPon both pls
Loan interest income ► S.15(1)(i) 。 sums, not otherwise chargeable to tax under this Part (i.e. not chargeable under s.14), received by or accrued to a financial institution by way of interest which arises through or from the carrying on by the financial institution of its business in Hong Kong, notwithstanding that the moneys in respect of which the interest is received or accrues are made available outside Hong Kong 。 Contrast to s.14: arising in or derived from HK What does "arises through or from" mean? Loan interest income is deemed taxable even though the loan is made available outside Hong Kong? 74
Reed, a manager for XYZ Products, issued company checks to pay his personal debts. So that no one in the company would know what he was doing, he disguised the name of the payees. For example, to pay his American Credit Card bill, he issued the XYZ check to “American.” XYZ Products sued the recipients of the checks, such as American Credit Card, demanding that the funds be returned. The trial court ruled against XYZ Products concluding that the Defendant-Payee, American Credit Card, was a holder in due course and thus took the checks free of any claims or defenses. Was the trial court correct in ruling that American Credit Card is a holder in due course? Why? What law is applicable? Can Reed be held criminally liable for his actions? Why or why not? Can Reed be civilly liable for his actions? To whom might Reed be liable and for what? 4. What is the business lesson to be learned from this case? Is this a fair result based on public policy constructs applicable to property…
Can you please explain the following section, it is talking about Hong Kong Tax, Special Business, Financial Instituition Profit Tax Computaion. Can you lease explain the following paragraph in a simlier way and with simple example. S.15(1)(i) ◦ sums, not otherwise chargeable to tax under this Part (i.e. not chargeable under s.14), received by or accrued to a financial institution by way of interest which arises through or from the carrying on by the financial institution of its business in Hong Kong, notwithstanding that the moneys in respect of which the interest is received or accrues are made available outside Hong Kong ◦ Contrast to s.14: arising in or derived from HK What does “arises through or from” mean? ◦ Loan interest income is deemed taxable even though the loan is made available outside Hong Kong?
need help asap
7 - Intellectual Property includes only intangible products of the human mind. TrueFalse
Pls help ASAPon both pls
You are President and CEO of Apex Business Systems, Inc. (Apex). Apex, through its purchasing agent, bought a new microwave from Inki Appliances Company (Inki) who sells microwaves on a daily basis. There was no written or oral warranty given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after it was placed it in the company kitchen. Assume also that nobody misused the microwave or in any way caused it to quit working. The purchasing agent returned the microwave three days after it quit working. The owner of Inki refused to repair or replace the microwave or offer a refund. Prepare a demand letter to be sent to Inki.
Identify and state the relevant facts in the case: [*1058] In addition, the Agreement authorizes Defendants to establish and fund a reserve account from Schnucks' payment card transactions to offset its indemnity obligations in an amount not to "exceed ... any current and anticipated Association fees or fines." (Bankcard [**6] Addendum at § 22.1) Schnucks alleges that following the data breach, "First Data received a preliminary case management report from MasterCard outlining the case management fee and the amount of monitoring/card replacement and fraud loss reimbursement it was assessing against Citicorp." (Compl. at ¶ 28) Based on the amount of MasterCard's assessment, First Data then projected the total amount of Visa's assessment (id. at ¶ 29), and established the reserve account by withholding a percentage each day from the funds it collected for Schnucks from its payment card transactions. (Id. at ¶¶ 30-31) Schnucks further alleges that Defendants have breached the Agreement…