E Which of the following was the result in the Juan Mendez, Jr as Guardian of Juan Mendez, Sr. v. Hampton Court Nursing Center, LLC in which a father was admitted to a nursing care facility and developed an eye infection causing the loss of his eye, and the son sued on behalf of the father? Multiple Choice The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable because the father was a donee third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable because the father was an intended third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that because the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was unenforceable because the father was an incidental third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that Mendez, Sr. was not bound by the arbitration clause in the nursing care contract because the son had signed the clause and the son was not the one injured.

icon
Related questions
Question
3
Which of the following was the result in the Juan Mendez, Jr as Guardian of Juan Mendez, Sr. v. Hampton Court Nursing Center, LLC in which a father was
admitted to a nursing care facility and developed an eye infection causing the loss of his eye, and the son sued on behalf of the father?
01:22:12
Multiple Choice
The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable
because the father was a donee third-party beneficiary under the contract.
The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable
because the father was an intended third-party beneficiary under the contract.
The court found that because the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was unenforceable
because the father was an incidental third-party beneficiary under the contract.
The court found that Mendez, Sr. was not bound by the arbitration clause in the nursing care contract because the son had signed the clause
and the son was not the one injured.
33 of 60
‒‒‒
Next >
Transcribed Image Text:3 Which of the following was the result in the Juan Mendez, Jr as Guardian of Juan Mendez, Sr. v. Hampton Court Nursing Center, LLC in which a father was admitted to a nursing care facility and developed an eye infection causing the loss of his eye, and the son sued on behalf of the father? 01:22:12 Multiple Choice The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable because the father was a donee third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that even though the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was enforceable because the father was an intended third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that because the son signed the contract that included the arbitration agreement, the arbitration clause was unenforceable because the father was an incidental third-party beneficiary under the contract. The court found that Mendez, Sr. was not bound by the arbitration clause in the nursing care contract because the son had signed the clause and the son was not the one injured. 33 of 60 ‒‒‒ Next >
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS