Mike and Jeff are still running a law practice in French Polynesia as a general partnership. The partnership currently rents a building in the city of Papeete. The landlord approaches Mike about selling the partnership the building. Mike agrees and signs a contract on behalf of the partnership. Jeff hear about it and calls the landlord and says that he is not interested in buying the building. Is there a valid contract to purchase the building?

Mike and Jeff are still running a law practice in French Polynesia as a general partnership. The partnership currently rents a building in the city of Papeete. The landlord approaches Mike about selling the partnership the building. Mike agrees and signs a contract on behalf of the partnership. Jeff hear about it and calls the landlord and says that he is not interested in buying the building. Is there a valid contract to purchase the building?

Similar questions

Lorraine and Darius are friends. Lorraine is engaged and wants to have the wedding of her dreams, but she cannot afford it. Darius wants to help with this, so he anonymously gives Lorraine $10,000. Lorraine is happy and does have the wedding of her dreams. A month later, Darius loses his job and asks Lorraine for the $10,000 back. Lorraine refuses. Darius sues Lorraine. The court will a. order Lorraine to pay Darius the money because she used the money. b. not order Lorraine to pay Darius the money because valid consideration was not present. c. order Lorraine to pay the money because anonymous gifts of money must be repaid. d. not order Lorraine to pay the money because there was nothing in writing.
Teresa and Kensington enter into an employment contract that contains an unenforceable arbitration clause. Teresa sues Kensington, but Kensington wants the contract to remain effective. How can the court rule that the contract is still valid? a. If the contract contains an integration clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. b. If the contract contains boilerplate, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. C. If the contract contains a severability clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. d. If the contract contains representations and warranties, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract.
Olav starts Power Cells to make and sell batteries. Later, Olav contracts with Quinn to invest additional capital in the firm in exchange for 25 percent of the profits. Olav and Quinn are not partners in Power Cells because
Max and Jack enter into a contract which states: "Jack will paint Max's kitchen blue and Max promises to pay Jack $200 upon completion." Which is an example of an implied condition? That Max will pay Jack upon completion of the painting. That Jack will use blue paint when painting Max's kitchen. That Max will allow Jack access to his kitchen That Max will pay Jack $200.
Skip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?
Raymond owns a bakery on main street that specializes in making custom cookies for special events. He has twenty years of baking and cookie decorating experience and has received numerous awards for his work. Clarice enters the bakery on morning to inquire about Raymond baking some cookies for her daughter’s birthday. The two enter into a contract in which Raymond agrees to bake two dozen cookies and decorate the cookies as characters from Clarice’s daughter’s favorite show. In their discussions, Raymond tells Clarice the cookies will be ‘approximately half a pound each’ in size. As they are in America, Clarice assumes that the half a pound size refers to the weight of the cookies, knowing that the size will vary as each cookie bakes slightly differently. Raymond, however, meant the half a pound size to signify that the cookies will be the size of a half-pound sterling, the primary currency in the United Kingdom. This measurement is significantly smaller than the half a pound in…
Willams and Nick are childhood friends. Nick had lost his right hand in an accident in childhood. They meet after a long time in a restaurant. On being asked, Nick tells Willams that he feels very discontented in managing his family business after the death of his father as it doesn't match his areas of interest. Willams knows that Nick possesses extraordinary skills in management although he hasn't acquired any professional degree in management. Therefore, he asks Nick to wind up his business in India and join him in his hotel business in Dubai as an Assistant Manager in the Sales and Marketing Division. In the context of the above case: 1. Can Nick be deployed to the post of Assistant Manager in the Sales and Marketing Division though he hasn't acquired any professional degree in management? Explain by giving suitable justifications in support of your answer. 2. List any two values that are reflected in this act of Willams.
Read the case of Lambert v. Barron. What are the most important facts that support Lambert’s position that a contract existed? What are the most important facts that support Barron’s position that a contract did not exist? Do you agree with the outcome of the case? https://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1241354.html
Palatka Costumes & Caps LLC ("PC & C") is a large props company formed in 1957, and Frodo Flags Corporation is a small, local flag manufacturer formed in 2015. These two businesses never had any dealings with each other until they recently entered into a contract, with terms all drafted by PC & C. The contract provides that PC & C shall purchase 1,000 flags that Frodo Flags will specially design for PC & C. The contract further provides that PC & C has the right to initiate, on a weekly basis, purchase orders of up to 100 flags until the contract's total number of flag purchases - 1,000 flags has been met. Also, the contract includes a clause stating that PC & C can cancel its obligation to pay for the remaining flags at any time if any Frodo Flags shipment does not arrive on the exact day as stated in a particular purchase order; this last provision is included in the contract even though time was of little importance to PC & C. W The first shipment of 100 flags arrives a day late,…
Pls help ASAP
I am not sure about the answer for this question The facts of a case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows: Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favor of M.C.R. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living with their daughter. Johnston led them to believe that the document was an unimportant amendment to an existing mortgage when it was a second substantial mortgage on their home. Neither read the document nor questioned it. When the payments were in arrears, the mortgagee took an action for foreclosure (to take their home). Mr. and Mrs. H. pleaded non-est factum. Would this defense succeed? Why or why not? Explain your response
. Bankruptcy and insolvency are interchangeable teams (they mean the same), do you agree? What are the purposes of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act R.S.C 1985, c. B-3.?