If any of the owners decided eventually to sell any or all of their shares and had identified a potential buyer, they all agreed that Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. should be granted the right to match the offer of the potential buyer and, thereby, buy back the shares rather than allowing that potential buyer to become a part owner of the company. To accomplish this, which of the following types of restrictions on transfer needs to be attached to the shares? Multiple Choice Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Consent restraint Right of first refusal Option agreement

If any of the owners decided eventually to sell any or all of their shares and had identified a potential buyer, they all agreed that Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. should be granted the right to match the offer of the potential buyer and, thereby, buy back the shares rather than allowing that potential buyer to become a part owner of the company. To accomplish this, which of the following types of restrictions on transfer needs to be attached to the shares? Multiple Choice Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Consent restraint Right of first refusal Option agreement

Similar questions

What are the terms used for the parties involved in the offers and negotiations leading up to the final contract? offeree and counteror offeror and recipient offeror and counteror offeror and offeree
Buyer Javier makes a formal offer to Seller Joy: $250,000 and the appliances stay. Joy counters: $250,000, no appliances. Joy then reconsiders and accepts the first offer. Is Javier is obligated to buy the home? Why or why not? Yes, because Javier never formally withdrew the offer. No, because once Javier's offer is countered, it is considered rejected and is dead. Yes, because Joy's counter was for the same amount of money as Javier's initial offer. No. because a buyer can withdraw from a contract for any reason without penalty.
Companies A and B differ only in their capital structure. A is financed 30% debt and 70% equity: B is financed 10% debt and 90% equity. The debt of both companies is risk-free. a. Rosencrantz owns 1% of the common stock of A. What other investment package would produce identical cash flow for Rosencrantz? b. Guildenstern owns 2% of common stock of B. What other investment package would produce identical cash flows for Guildenstern?
Hale's Productions is considering producing a pilot for a comedy series in the hope of selling it to a major streaming service. The streaming service may decide to reject the series, but it may also decide to purchase the rights to the series for either one or two years. At this point in time, Hale may either produce the pilot and wait for the streaming service's decision or transfer the rights for the pilot and series to a competitor for $100,000. Hale's decision alternatives and profits (in thousands of dollars) are as follows: Decision Alternative P(F) = 0.69 P(U) = 0.31 P(S₁IF) = = 0.07 P(S₂IF) = 0.29 P(S3IF) = 0.64 Produce pilot, d₁ Sell to competitor, d₂ The probabilities for the states of nature are P(S₁) = 0.1878, P(S₂) 0.3210, and P(S3) = 0.4912. For a consulting fee of $5,000, an agency will review the plans for the comedy series and indicate the overall chances of a favorable streaming service reaction to the series. Assume that the agency review will result in a favorable…
Ditsapelo Unlimited on 1 January 2024 granted 300 share appreciation rights (SARS) to each of its 200 employees on the condition that they continue to work for the entity for two years. At 1 January 2024, the entity expects that 50 of those employees will leave each year. During 2024, 20 employees leave Ditsapelo Unlimited. The entity expects that the same number will leave in the second year. 25 Employees are expected to leave during 2025. The SARS vest on 31 December 2025 and can be exercised during 2026 and 2027. On 31 December 2026, 105 of the eligible employees exercised their SARS in full. The remaining eligible employees exercised their SARS in full on 31 December 2027. The fair value and intrinsic value of each SAR was as follows: Reporting date FV per SAR Intrinsic value per SAR 31 December 2024 P10 31 December 2025 P15 31 December 2026 P16 P16 31 December 2027 P17 P17 Required: a) Calculate the amount to be recognised as a remuneration expense in the statement of profit or…
Able does not ever want Baker's shares to be transferred to Baker's brother, who has been convicted of criminal fraud and embezzlement on several occasions and who is currently serving time in a federal prison for one of those convictions. Which of the following types of restrictions on the transfer of Baker's shares might Able insist to accomplish this, even if Carter and Dennis don't share Able's concerns? Multiple Choice A put agreement Option agreement Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Right of first refusal
Hale's TV Production is considering producing a pilot for a comedy series in the hope of selling it to a major television network. The network may decide to reject the series, but it may also decide to purchase the rights to the series for either one or two years. At this point in time, Hale may either produce the pilot and wait for the network's decision or transfer the rights for the pilot and series to a competitor for $100,000. Hale's decision alternatives and profits (in thousands of dollars) are as follows: The probabilities for the states of nature are P(S1) = 0.20, P(S2) = 0.30, and P(S3) = 0.50. For a consulting fee of $5000, an agency will review the plans for the comedy series and indicate the overall chances of a favorable network reaction to the series. Assume that the agency review will result in a favorable (F) or an unfavorable (U) review and that the following probabilities are relevant: Construct a decision tree for this problem What is the recommended decision if…
What are the two exceptions to the general rule that an entity should allocate the transaction price based on the relative standalone selling price? Are the percentage-of completion and the completed contract methods both viable alternatives for a given contract Explain Does aggregating the five components of pension cost always result in a reduction in income? Do corporations report the projected benefit obligation and the plan assets as individual accounts on the sponsor corporation’s balance sheet?
What was the correct interpretation of condition 4 in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following. A plan containing the 9 lots being sold should have already been lodged for registration at the time of contract. The plan attached to the contract containing 35 lots could be registered in 2 stages, so long as the plan already lodged at the time of contract contained the 9 lots being sold. The plan attached to the contract containing 35 lots should have already been lodged for registration at the time of contract. The plan attached to the contract containing 35 lots could be lodged within 14 days of the contract being signed.
James is looking to enter into a listing contract with Mary to sell her house. The two are trying to come to an agreement on what type of listing contract to use. What type of listing contract will offer James the least amount of protection? O An open listing agreement since it is a unilateral contract. O An exclusive Right to Sell agreement since it is a bilateral contract. O An Exclusive Agency agreement since the owner can still find a buyer themselves O An Exclusive Agency agreement since it is a unilateral contract.
Skip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?
Read the case of Lambert v. Barron. What are the most important facts that support Lambert’s position that a contract existed? What are the most important facts that support Barron’s position that a contract did not exist? Do you agree with the outcome of the case? https://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1241354.html