What was the ultimate outcome of the appeal to the High Court in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following Mona Homes had properly terminated the contract. The contract was terminated by abandonment. The contract had not been terminated and was still binding DTR Nominees had properly terminated the contract.

What was the ultimate outcome of the appeal to the High Court in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following Mona Homes had properly terminated the contract. The contract was terminated by abandonment. The contract had not been terminated and was still binding DTR Nominees had properly terminated the contract.

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products. Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin. After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets. Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…
CCS Pty Ltd is registered with Mira and Aaron as its directors. CCS Pty Ltd hasissued five shares, with the following persons owning one each: Mira, Aaron, Ryan(Mira's son), Janice (Aaron's daughter) and Marilyn (Aaron's friend). CS Pty Ltdoperates a business that manutactures and sells widgetsFor each of the following developments, explain whether the shareholders and/ordirectors would be personally liable to the landlord, NAB Bank, Janice or AcmeComputers Pty Ltd.(d)CCS Pty Ltd enters into a lease for new premises where the business is to beheadquartered.CCS Pty Ltd borrows $100 000 from NAB Bank on an unsecured basis. Mirapersonally guarantees the repayment of the loan.CCS Pty Ltd purchases a block of land from Janice for $500 000 to build anew warehouse. CCS Pty Ltd grants Janice a mortgage over the land equal tothe $500 000 purchase price.CCS Pty Ltd purchases several computers from Acme Computers Pty Ltd.One third of the purchase price is paid on delivery and the balance is…
What did Stephen, Mason and Jacob JJ hold in respect of DTR Nominee's claim against Mona Homes in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it and DTR Nominees was not, at that time, ready, will and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract but DTR Nominees could not terminate because it was not, at that time, ready, willing and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract and DTR Nominees had the right to terminate. Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it, but they had seriously breached an intermediate term.
2. Footsmell Shoe Store, Inc. entered into a separate contracts with two rising movie stars, namely Anton and Bart. With Anton, the agreement was that the shoe store shall deliver at a specified date for the price of P10,000.00 a pair of Mikee Shoes which the store has been manufacturing for the general public but which at the time of the contract had already been sold out, and with Bart, the agreement was that the shoe store shall deliver at a specified date for a price of P20,000.00 a pair of shoes to be made specially for him, in accordance with a design submitted by him. What is the nature of these two contracts? Explain.
Fatima and Saira are sisters. They own a land. Fatima and Saira gave their land to Fatima's daughter, Mariam. The land was given to Mariam by Fatima on the condition that she will pay 200 OMR to Saira every year. The daughter agrees to the condition and signs the agreement, but later does not pay it. So, Saira has filed a complaint against Mariam. Questions a. Can Saira claim the payment from Mariam? Explain why or why not? b. Is the contract in this case enforceable by law? Explain why or why not?
What is the rules established under the case law of Buckley & Young Ltd v CIR (1978) 3 NZTC 61,271 (CA)?
Reaction to discussion below: Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building where alarm systems were maintained by the ADT company. When the systems were defective and allowed water into the building, it damaged Melodee’s property; Then Melodee decided to sue ADT and their defense was that the service contract limited the liability to 10% of the annual service charge given to the customers. The limitation can be valid since the ADT company did not provide much liability protection. The ADT company can offer another protection plan to Melodee, which would cover her property but at a higher price rate. This case limitation of liability clauses will be enacted since ADT company was not fully liable for Melodee's property, which only would cover the limited 10%. A limitation of liability clauses contract states that one of the parties is not fully liable for damages in case of a breach. The ADT company is at fault for the malfunctions in their systems they should offer a higher…
Mike's Landscaping Inc. enters into an oral contract with the Padres to keep the infield in top condition for the next five years. Six months into the contract the Padres fire Mike. What will happen in a breach of contract suit filed by Mike? Mike will lose because the contract was not in writing Mike will win because he was never late and his work was first rate. O The Padres will lose Mike will win and be awarded the profit he would have made had the contract been performed.
Cari enters a single-agency relationship with a listing broker, who owes her full disclosure and loyalty. The listing broker then finds Buyer Bonnie who wants that same broker to represent her in a transaction broker relationship, providing Bonnie with certain duties such as limited confidentiality. Can the broker represent Cari in a single-agency relationship AND represent Bonnie as a transaction broker in the same transaction? No, because offering Bonnie limited confidentiality would conflict with the full disclosure already owed to Cari. Yes, but only if the limited confidentiality owed to Bonnie is needed to fulfill Cari's objective of selling the property. Yes, as long as the broker tries to be fair to br + parties.
A broker enters into a listing contract with a seller. The broker markets the property for several weeks and receives four offers. The seller selects the highest bid and ultimately closes on the property. However, the seller refuses to pay the broker their commission. What happens next? The broker can negotiate a smaller commission with the seller. О The broker can take legal action against the seller to obtain the commission owed to them since they successfully found a buyer for the property. О The broker can force the buyer to pay the commission. The broker cannot do anything as a commission in this case is only optional.
If a minor purchase a $150.00 pair of designer blue jeans the merchant may be unable to enforce this contract because: a) the jeans were a necessity. b) clothes are a statutory contract. c) designer jeans are a luxury. d) only emancipated minors wear jeans. 2. An adult who intentionally drinks so much liquor as to have their judgment impaired will a) easily defeat a contract they entered in to while drunk b) have no chance of winning under any circumstances. c) probably lose, voluntary intoxication is usually a poor defense. 3. Which of the following must a person possess to have contractual capacity? a) Comprehend the nature of the Contract b) Comprehend the purpose of the Contract c) Comprehend the consequences of the Contract d) All of the above are required
Please answer with explanation and care of plagiarism please i give up vote