Case 5 P Corp, a retailer of women’s fashion accessories, contracted Sandra as their purchasing agent. The agency contract expressly stipulates that Sandra is not allowed to enter into contract in excess of $50,000.00 without first obtaining approval from P Corp. On a number of occasions, Sandra negotiated the purchase of quantities of costume jewellery from Z Inc for prices varying between $30,000 to $45,000.00. Recently, Sandra placed an order with Z Inc for goods at a price of $60,000.00 and without consulting P Corp. Z Inc did not question the order. Two weeks after, Z Inc received payment from P Corp. Sandra was reprimanded by P Corp and, again, reminded of her $50,000.00 limit. Despite the warning, Sandra placed another order of $55,000.00 from Z Inc. This time P Corp refuse to pay and demanded Z Inc to take back the goods. Issues: Is Sandra acting on actual or apparent authority? Is the principal bound by the action of the agent, Sandra? Please state your reasons

Case 5 P Corp, a retailer of women’s fashion accessories, contracted Sandra as their purchasing agent. The agency contract expressly stipulates that Sandra is not allowed to enter into contract in excess of $50,000.00 without first obtaining approval from P Corp. On a number of occasions, Sandra negotiated the purchase of quantities of costume jewellery from Z Inc for prices varying between $30,000 to $45,000.00. Recently, Sandra placed an order with Z Inc for goods at a price of $60,000.00 and without consulting P Corp. Z Inc did not question the order. Two weeks after, Z Inc received payment from P Corp. Sandra was reprimanded by P Corp and, again, reminded of her $50,000.00 limit. Despite the warning, Sandra placed another order of $55,000.00 from Z Inc. This time P Corp refuse to pay and demanded Z Inc to take back the goods. Issues: Is Sandra acting on actual or apparent authority? Is the principal bound by the action of the agent, Sandra? Please state your reasons

Similar questions

Broker Juanita is in a single agent relationship with Seller Mike when one of Juanita's sponsored sales associates brings a buyer to the transaction. Select the statement that indicates what Juanita will need to do with respect to her relationship with Seller Mike if the buyer remains in a transaction broker relationship with the sponsored sales associate. No further actions are needed with respect to Mike's relationship. move Mike to a transaction broker relationship by having him sign a consent to transaction disclosure notice move Mike to a transaction broker relationship without informing him
Mary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice in the Daily News for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2022. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item the “Mozart Pottery”, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site, she found a notice stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary thereafter proceeded to a nearby antique shop and saw on display in the window, the identical “Mozart Pottery” priced at $10,000. Mary told the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $8,000 for it. However, Anthony indicated that he is willing to sell the pottery for $9,500. Mary then indicated to him that she desires some time to think it over and after lunch she will advise him. Anthony subsequently, agreed not to sell the identified pottery, until she return after lunch. However, Anthony forgot his promised to Mary and sold it to John for $9,500 before…
Jarvis Enterprises ordered 50 boxes of blueberries from Agricultural Wholesalers, Inc. Agriculture delivered 50 boxes of blackberries. Jarvis rejected the blackberries and attempted to contact Agriculture. After many unsuccessful attempts, Jarvis decided to sell the blackberries to Cold Ice Cream Co. for $500. Jarvis was ready to forward the money after deducting its expenses and a commission to Agriculture, but when Agriculture learned the sale price, it objected. Agriculture feels that the blackberries had a fair market value of $1,200, and that Jarvis sold the blackberries too cheaply. Discuss the legal rights and duties of Jarvis in this situation.
Explain the difference between a docketing fee and a cancellation fee of an arbitrator.
David M. Fox was a distributor of tools manufactured and sold by Matco Tools Corporation (Matco). Cox purchased tools from Matco, using a credit line that he repaid as the tools were sold. The credit line was secured by Cox’s Matco tool inventory. In order to expedite payment on Cox’s line of credit, Matco decided to authorize Cox to deposit any customer checks that were made payable to “Matco Tools” or “Matco” into Cox’s own account. Matco’s controller sent Cox’s bank, Pontiac State Bank (Pontiac), a letter stating that Cox was authorized to make such deposits. Several years later, some Matco tools were stolen from Cox’s inventory. The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers), which insured Cox against such a loss, sent Cox a settlement check in the amount of $24,960. The check was made payable to “David M. Cox and Matco Tool Co.” Cox indorsed the check and deposited it in his account at Pontiac. Pon-tiac forwarded the check through the banking system for payment by the drawee bank.…
Xavier purchased a condominium unit at Atmos Towers in January 2018 for P 3,000,000. In the agreement, Xavier will pay a 20% downpayment and thereafter pay a monthly installment fee of P 65,000 for 60 months. In June 2020, or after paying 29 monthly installments, Xavier failed to pay his obligations because his fast-food business went bankrupt due to the pandemic. (a) What are the rights of Xavier under the Maceda Law? (b) In the above case, how much is the cash surrender value that must be returned to Xavier in case he fails to pay after the grace period?
Live The Dream Ltd provides a limousine and driver hire service. All of the company’s clients sign the company’s standard contract. The contract includes a clause, within the standard terms and conditions, that states: ‘Live The Dream Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any financial loss, property damage or personal injury incurred during the hire period’. Leona hired a limousine and driver for her 40th birthday night out. She signed the standard contract which included the standard terms and conditions and paid £500, the full cost of the hire, in advance. When Leona was getting into the limousine at the start of her night out, the vehicle was nudged from behind by a passing car. As a result, the limousine rolled forward and ran over Leona’s foot. Leona’s foot was badly bruised and Leona was in too much pain to continue with her birthday night out. The other vehicle involved drove off, and all subsequent attempts to identify the vehicle and the driver failed. Live The Dream Ltd…
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
A. 1. X, Y, and Z, co-owners, sold a inverter air-condition unit to A. They solidarity bound themselves to deliver the aircon unit in March 30. Through the fault of Y, the aircon unit was completely destroyed . Give the rights and obligations of the parties. B. 1. Joe, Nicolas, and Dante obliged themselves jointly to deliver to Ricky a particular racing horse on April 1. Their agreement which was made known to Ricky is that they will contribute the amount in buying the particular horse. However, the horse was not delivered on the date due because of failure of Nicolas to give his share of the purchase price. State the rights and obligations of the parties. 2. Dindo binds himself to pay his P20,000 loan in four (4) equal monthly installments. Is the obligation of Dindo divisible or indivisible? C. 1. Jaevis promised to deliver to Kyle a breeding cow. Their contract contains a penal clause that in the case of non-fulfillment, Jaevis Shall pay a penalty of P10,000. Jaevis wants to juts…
What is the basis for enforcing a contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel?
The standard of reivew used by the Connecticut Supreme Court in determining whether the takings were constitutional under the 5th Amendment was: a. The takings were reasonably necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. b. The takings were substantially necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. c. There was clear and convincing evidence that the economic benefits of City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass. d. The evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt that the economic benefits of the City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.
May a contract of sale entered into in violation of a third party’s right of first refusal be rescinded in order that such third party can exercise said right?