Howard received $12 000 of the $39 000 price for his rare, impeccably maintained antique 1976 Jaguar XLfrom Wyn Wyn wil be able to add the Jaguar to her elassie car collection upon pyment ef the balance, due30 days from the signing the contract. Prior to that date, Philip paid Howard $45 000 outright in exchangefor the Jaguar. What amount of damages could you be reasonably certain of a court awarding to Wyn?Select one: © $6000 $12 000 $18 000 ⚫ $45 000•

Contracts: Contracts are legally binding agreements between two or more parties that outline their…

Answered: Howard received $12 000 of the $39 000…

Similar questions

A8
Buyer Javier makes a formal offer to Seller Joy: $250,000 and the appliances stay. Joy counters: $250,000, no appliances. Joy then reconsiders and accepts the first offer. Is Javier is obligated to buy the home? Why or why not? Yes, because Javier never formally withdrew the offer. No, because once Javier's offer is countered, it is considered rejected and is dead. Yes, because Joy's counter was for the same amount of money as Javier's initial offer. No. because a buyer can withdraw from a contract for any reason without penalty.
am. 119.
Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.
Professor Shott buys a Porsche against the wishes of his much more intelligent wife. Professor Shott soon realizes his mistake when he starts to make the car payments. Jane, a very wealthy 17 year old, offers to buy the Porsche and Professor Shott accepts. Now assume that before she turns 18 Jane gets in an accident and badly damages the Porsche causing $20,000 in damage. Assume she originally paid Professor Shott $50,000 for the car. If Jane now seeks to return the damaged car what is the result? Professor Shott must refund Jane his money minus the amount of the damages. Professor Shott does not have to refund Jane anything. Professor Shott can demand it be repaired before giving Jane a refund. Professor Shott must refund Jane 100% of his money even though he damaged the car.
Ramona Smith spilled orange juice on her computer two days before her term paper was due. Ramona desperately needed a new laptop, so she went online and found a laptop that fit her needs. She emailed the seller, Effie Frost, expressing her desire to purchase the laptop. Effie ernailed Ramona back and said that she (Effie) would sell Effie's laptop to Ramona for $300. An hour later, Ramona and Effie signed the following agreement: "1, Effie Frost, agree to sell my laptop computer to Ramona Smith for Four Hundred Dollars and zero cents. This is the entirety of the agreement. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements made by the seller and the buyer." Ramona now claims that she should only pay $300 for the laptop because during that initial email exchange with Effie, Effie told Ramona that $300 was the price of the laptop, and she has the email exchange as evidence of the price quote of $300. What legal concept could be used to enforce the contract for $400? O Condition…
Steve was hired to paint the outside of Denise's house for a price of $1500. Steve showed up everyday to paint and the job was completed in about three weeks. He told Denise he would come- to pick up his payment on Thursday. On Wednesday, Denise me py noticed that one of the spots on the back of the house needed to re-done because it looked messy. When Steve asked for payment Denise refused to pay him anything telling him that he did a messy job and he would have to sue her. Steve is entitled to payment under a theory of subjective contracts. Denise will win because Steve breached the contract. Steve is entitled to payment under a theory of substantial performance. Denise will win and not have to pay anything.
9
Michael built a calculator (which graphs) using plans Michael found posted on the internet, but he unreasonably didn’t follow the plans when he constructed the calculator. Michael then sold the calculator to Jack who was injured when the calculator exploded because it hadn’t been built according to the plans. After the explosion Jack was taken to the Hospital emergency room (“ER”) where he signed a consent form authorizing Dr. Joe, the ER doctor, to perform a surgical procedure called Surgery X. But, instead Dr. Joe performed Surgery Y, a different procedure than Surgery X. A. What cause(s) of action should Jack use if he sues Michael for Jack’s injuries. Discuss. B. Has Joe, the ER doctor, committed any intentional torts? If so, discuss.
Alan’s real estate broker suggested that he use a quitclaim deed to sell his super cool Brentwood condo so that the buyer would: Be the grantor under the deed and have full recourse against the seller for any title related claims Acquire only the legal interest in the property that Alan previously held Know that all prior mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances had either been reconveyed or removed from the property’s title Receive assurance that the property was free from any title defects
Eric and Susan just purchased their first home, which cost $140,000. They purchased a homeowner’s policy to insure the home for $130,000 and personal property for $80,000. They declined any coverage for additional living expenses. The deductible for the policy is $500. Soon after Eric and Susan moved into their new home, a strong windstorm caused damage to their roof. They reported the roof damage to be $19,500. While the roof was under repair, the couple had to live in a nearby hotel for three days. The hotel bill amounted to $420. Assuming the insurance company settles claims using the replacement value method, what amount will the insurance company pay for the damages to the roof?
Brian Felley went to the home of Tom and Cheryl Singleton on June 8 to look at a used car that the Singletons had advertised for sale in the local paper. The car was a 1991 Ford with 126,000 miles on it. Following a test drive and the Singletons’ represen- tation that the car was “in good mechanical condi- tion,” Felley purchased the car for $5,800. By June 18, 1997, Felley had the car in the shop and had paid $942.76 to have its clutch fixed. By July 9, 1997, Felley also had paid $971.18 for a new brake job. By September 16, 1997, Felley had paid another Felley brought suit for breach of express war- ranty. An auto expert testified that the clutch and brakes were defective when Felley bought the car. Was an express warranty breached? Why or why not? [Felley v. Singleton , 705 N.E.2d 930 (Ill. App.)] $429.09 for further brake work

SEE MORE QUESTIONS