Brian Felley went to the home of Tom and Cheryl Singleton on June 8 to look at a used car that the Singletons had advertised for sale in the local paper. The car was a 1991 Ford with 126,000 miles on it. Following a test drive and the Singletons’ represen- tation that the car was “in good mechanical condi- tion,” Felley purchased the car for $5,800. By June 18, 1997, Felley had the car in the shop and had paid $942.76 to have its clutch fixed. By July 9, 1997, Felley also had paid $971.18 for a new brake job. By September 16, 1997, Felley had paid another Felley brought suit for breach of express war- ranty. An auto expert testified that the clutch and brakes were defective when Felley bought the car. Was an express warranty breached? Why or why not? [Felley v. Singleton , 705 N.E.2d 930 (Ill. App.)] $429.09 for further brake work

Brian Felley went to the home of Tom and Cheryl Singleton on June 8 to look at a used car that the Singletons had advertised for sale in the local paper. The car was a 1991 Ford with 126,000 miles on it. Following a test drive and the Singletons’ represen- tation that the car was “in good mechanical condi- tion,” Felley purchased the car for $5,800. By June 18, 1997, Felley had the car in the shop and had paid $942.76 to have its clutch fixed. By July 9, 1997, Felley also had paid $971.18 for a new brake job. By September 16, 1997, Felley had paid another Felley brought suit for breach of express war- ranty. An auto expert testified that the clutch and brakes were defective when Felley bought the car. Was an express warranty breached? Why or why not? [Felley v. Singleton , 705 N.E.2d 930 (Ill. App.)] $429.09 for further brake work

Similar questions

An individual who has liability, medical payments, uninsured motorist, other than collision, collision, crashed into a flower shop. Damage to the shop would be paid under which coverage? A- collision coverage B- uninsured motorist C- medical payments D- liability
John Beck was injured at the Drive-Thru at Taco Bell when an impatient driver behind him fired his gun at John’s car. When would Taco Bell be liable for John’s injuries? a. Taco Bell would be liable if John was negligent. b. Taco Bell is always liable for John’s injuries because he is an invitee. c. Taco Bell could never be liable for John’s injuries. d. Taco Bell would be liable if the firing of the shot was foreseeable.
Should FedEx be liable for the alleged loss of valuable rare coins when FedEx did not know what the package contained. Rykard v. FedEx Ground Package System.
Pacific Southern Airlines (PSA) had an unhappy customer. Cynthia Mercier-Walters flew from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Phoenix, Arizona. The flight stopped briefly at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where she got off the plane for half an hour. When she returned to her seat, her $400 prescription reading glasses were gone. She asked the flight attendant where the glasses were, and the attendant said they probably were thrown away since the cleaning crew had come in with big bags and tossed everything in them. Ms. Mercier-Walters tried to locate the glasses through the airline’s lost-and-found service, but she failed. Then she wrote a strong letter to the airline demanding reimbursement for the loss. She felt that it was obvious that she was returning to her seat. The airline, however, knows that an overwhelming number of passengers arriving at hubs switch planes for their connecting flights. The airline does not know who is returning. What’s more, flight attendants…
Onslow Company purchased a used machine for $288,000 cash on January 2. On January 3, Onslow paid $8,000 to wire electricity to the machine. Onslow paid an additional $1,600 on January 4 to secure the machine for operation. The machine will be used for six years and have a $34,560 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. On December 31, at the end of its fifth year in operations, it is disposed of. Problem 8-6A (Algo) Part 3 3. Prepare journal entries to record the machine's disposal under each separate situation: (a) it is sold for $21,000 cash and (b) it is sold for $84,000 cash. View transaction list View journal entry worksheet No Date December 31 Cash Accumulated depreciation-Machinery Loss on sale of machinery Machinery General Journal Debit Credit 21,000 213,700 63,300 288,000 December 31 Cash 84,000 Accumulated depreciation-Machinery 213,700 Machinery 288,000
13. Sam Fraser, 24 years of age and single, possesses a two-year-old vehicle which he drives to work (a distance of 7(1/2) miles, full circle). He keeps the vehicle in 03 region, and has had one auto crash during the previous three years. What amount would Sam save money on a mix of $100-deductible impact and thorough inclusion on the off chance that he drove a vehicle delegated image 1 instead of as image 5? We don't know whether Sam has had driver preparing.
Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insurer? OA. To inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of loss OC. To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a daim for which the insured has been found legally responsible OD
Karen is on the highway headed home from Toronto. Traffic is moving slowly and she sees that an accident is the cause of the slow down. As she gets up to the scene, she notices debris and car parts all over the highway. She panics realizing she will have no choice but to drive over it. As a result, her front tires blow out and she fears damage has been done to the underside of her vehicle as well. How would Karen's insurer typically assess this loss? Comprehensive claim, as she did not hit another auto. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle, At Fault claim. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle. Not at Fault claim. Liability claim, as it is the third party's fault for the debris on the road.
Dr. Susan Rice asks Bruce Goldman, CMA (AAMA), to instruct patient Dottie Tate in the use of a walker to prevent further falls at home. Dottie is silent as Dr. Rice leaves the examination room and Bruce proceeds to set the walker correctly. However, when Dottie sees that Bruce must once again put Dottie in a gait belt for her protection—the belt was used earlier in the examination to assess Dottie’s ability to ambulate—the patient gets feisty. She is visibly tired and ready to go home. “I’ll learn to use the walker if I have to, but I won’t wear that belt. It makes me feel like a baby. And it’s such a bother. Who wants to go through all that? We just don’t need it.” Answer the following questions, which are also found in the Reflection Activity for Chapter 32 of the textbook: What is the best action of the medical assistant? What is the best therapeutic response of the medical assistant? Could the situation have been avoided? If so, how? If not, why not?
William Brill a truck driver, had just delivered lumber to Queens lumber. As he was returning to his truck he was hit by a forklift driven bv an employee eric vigil. After sustaining serious injuries, Brill sued both Queens Lumber and Vigil for negligence. What elements does brill have to prove to establish negligence? In general, what duty does a driver of a motor vehicle have to pedestrians? On what theory of liability could Queens Lumber be found negligent? Would the result be the same if Brill had failed to look both ways before walking back to his truck? Brill v Queens lumber Co.
Drehman Paving & Flooring Co. installed a brick floor at Cumberland Farms that its salesman promised would be “just like” another floor Cumberland had installed several years earlier. The bricks in the new floor came loose because Drehman had failed to install expansion joints. Expansion joints were not included in the second floor contract but were part of the first. Can Cumberland recover? Under what theory?
Susan Lacroix’s Yerf-Dog go-kart was stolen from her driveway one evening when she went inside to have dinner. The thief placed an advertisement in the newspaper and sold it to Ronald Casey for half what it was worth. Later, Lacroix recognized the kart in Casey’s yard and identified it as hers through its serial number. In a suit brought by Lacroix for the return of the go-kart, Casey argued that he now had title to the kart because he paid for it without knowledge that it had been stolen. Is Casey’s argument sound? Explain.