Jarvis Enterprises ordered 50 boxes of blueberries from Agricultural Wholesalers, Inc. Agriculture delivered 50 boxes of blackberries. Jarvis rejected the blackberries and attempted to contact Agriculture. After many unsuccessful attempts, Jarvis decided to sell the blackberries to Cold Ice Cream Co. for $500. Jarvis was ready to forward the money after deducting its expenses and a commission to Agriculture, but when Agriculture learned the sale price, it objected. Agriculture feels that the blackberries had a fair market value of $1,200, and that Jarvis sold the blackberries too cheaply. Discuss the legal rights and duties of Jarvis in this situation.

Jarvis Enterprises ordered 50 boxes of blueberries from Agricultural Wholesalers, Inc. Agriculture delivered 50 boxes of blackberries. Jarvis rejected the blackberries and attempted to contact Agriculture. After many unsuccessful attempts, Jarvis decided to sell the blackberries to Cold Ice Cream Co. for $500. Jarvis was ready to forward the money after deducting its expenses and a commission to Agriculture, but when Agriculture learned the sale price, it objected. Agriculture feels that the blackberries had a fair market value of $1,200, and that Jarvis sold the blackberries too cheaply. Discuss the legal rights and duties of Jarvis in this situation.

Similar questions

Suture Express was a new upstart specializing in the medical supply network by selling only sutures. Owens & Minor was a medical supply distributor that carried all types of medical supplies, including sutures. Owens & Minor began bundling provisions that required its customers to pay a premium for all medical products unless the customer agreed to purchase its sutures. Suture Express brought suit alleging a loss to Owens & Minor through anticompetitive practices. Is this a tying situation that violates federal antitrust laws? Why or why not?
A consumer entered into an agreement with Rent-It Corporation for the rental of a television set at a charge of $17 per week. The agreement also provides that if the renter chooses to rent the set for seventy-eight consecutive weeks, title would be transferred. The consumer now contends that the agreement was really a sales agreement, not a lease, and therefore is a credit sale subject to the Truth-in-Lending Act. Explain whether the consumer is correct.
The standard of reivew used by the Connecticut Supreme Court in determining whether the takings were constitutional under the 5th Amendment was: a. The takings were reasonably necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. b. The takings were substantially necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. c. There was clear and convincing evidence that the economic benefits of City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass. d. The evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt that the economic benefits of the City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.
In the case, the Supreme Court held the content of Westboro's signs related to private matters. True False
Hyde is a broker involved in a conflicting demands settlement procedure that has already begun. The escrow funds are held in an attorney's escrow account. Hyde seeks an EDO from the FREC. How will the FREC likely respond? The FREC will not issue an EDO because the funds are in an attorney's escrow account. The FREC will issue an EDO within ten business days. The FREC will issue an EDO if the other three settlement procedures don't work. The FREC will not issue an EDO because the dispute must be settled
After receiving a promotion to logistics manager, Shantil’s husband, Ashton, purchased a 2017 BMW SUV for $68,000; however, he financed $48,000 through First Florida Banc. The bank took a security interest in the vehicle. Ashton was out of town for work when Shantil found out he had been having an affair. Shantil took a baseball bat and broke the windows and put dents in the BMW. Shantil then dropped the car off at the girlfriend’s apartment. Ashton was furious. After taking the car to a body shop for repairs, Ashton was unable to pay the bill due to the divorce, so he negotiated terms with the body shop; however, the shop retained possession of the vehicle. The repair shop claimed a lien on the car for services and materials in the amount of $21,250. Ashton stopped making payments to the bank while he was trying to save money to pay off the repair. First Florida Banc claimed priority. Discuss the rights of each party and determine which party is in the best position to prevail
4. Under Article 4 of the Uniform Commercial code, a stale check is a check that was drawn more than 4 months before being presented. True False 5. A consumer who make a contract with a door to door salesman who comes to the consumer's home, has 5 days to cancel the contract in accordance with a Federal Trade commission regulation. True False 6. Sarah works as an employee for her employer , ABC Corporation, which is a private company. Sarah's employer can compel her to accept her salary payment by electronic transfer. True False 7. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, any person who obtains information from a credit agency under false pretenses is subject to criminal and civil penalties True False
Greg, a consumer in Tennessee, sent a purchase order to Campbell Manufacturing, a U.S. company, for a 4000 PSI gas pressure washer valued at $1275. Greg needed a new pressure washer for his part time business of washing houses. The order did not specify how disputes between the parties would be settled. Campbell returned a definite, unconditional acceptance that contained one additional term which stated that disputes must be submitted to arbitration. Greg received the acceptance; however, he never agreed or objected to the additional term. Campbell orally contracted to sell 15 pressure washers to London Painting Company a large commercial painting company in France. Explain the status of the contract between Greg and Campbell. If a contract was formed, did the additional term in the acceptance become part of the contract? Is the contract between Campbell and London legally enforceable? (Additional research outside of the textbook may be necessary).
Carol White ordered a $225 pair of contact lenses through an optometrist. White, an emancipated minor, paid $100 by check and agreed to pay the remaining $125 at a later time. The doctor ordered the lenses, incurring a debt of $110. After the lenses were ordered, White called to cancel her order and stopped payment on the $100 check. The lenses could be used by no one but White. The doctor sued White for the value of the lenses. Will the doctor be able to recover the money from White? Explain.
1. Alfred, a retailer, orders from Mark, a nuts merchant, ten tons of mixed nuts. In addition, he asked Mark if he could put the nuts aside and store them until he was ready for them. Mark accepts the order, carries out Alfred’s request and notifies him that the ten tons of mixed nuts had been put aside in accordance with his request and await collection. Days later the warehouse in which the nuts were stored was burnt down and all the nuts therein were destroyed. Using your knowledge of contracts for the sale of goods and a decided case, advise Mark whether he will succeed in recovering the price of the nuts from Alfred. Remember to use the IRAC method. a) With the aid of an example or illustration, distinguish between TWO (2) of the following pairs of terms: a sale and an agreement to sell condition and a warranty property and possession damages and rescission
Cari enters a single-agency relationship with a listing broker, who owes her full disclosure and loyalty. The listing broker then finds Buyer Bonnie who wants that same broker to represent her in a transaction broker relationship, providing Bonnie with certain duties such as limited confidentiality. Can the broker represent Cari in a single-agency relationship AND represent Bonnie as a transaction broker in the same transaction? No, because offering Bonnie limited confidentiality would conflict with the full disclosure already owed to Cari. Yes, but only if the limited confidentiality owed to Bonnie is needed to fulfill Cari's objective of selling the property. Yes, as long as the broker tries to be fair to br + parties.
Raquel is an agent for Occasion Photography, owned by Luke. Without disclosing her agency status, Raquel agrees by contract to take Ella's wedding photographs. When Luke finds out, he explains the agency relationship he has with Raquel to Ella and says that he wants to take the photographs because a lady he wants to ask out on a date is expected to be at the wedding. However, despite Luke's explanation, Ella still requests that Raquel take her wedding photographs. Which of the following is true regarding the rights of the parties? Multiple Choice Luke has a right to take the photographs.