OOOLuke has a right to take the photographs only if his contract with Raquel expresslyprovides that he can take over her photo shoots.Ella has a right to insist that Raquel take the photographs because Ella's contractrequired Raquel's services.Luke has a right to take the photographs only if the contract is in an amount over$500.Luke has a right to take the photographs unless the contract Raquel has with Ella is inwriting in which case Ella has the right to insist that Raquel take the photographs. Raquel is an agent for Occasion Photography, owned by Luke. Without disclosing her agency status,Raquel agrees by contract to take Ella's wedding photographs. When Luke finds out, he explains theagency relationship he has with Raquel to Ella and says that he wants to take the photographs because alady he wants to ask out on a date is expected to be at the wedding. However, despite Luke's explanation,Ella still requests that Raquel take her wedding photographs. Which of the following is true regarding therights of the parties?Multiple ChoiceLuke has a right to take the photographs.

A contract is a legal agreement between two or more persons or companies where both parties agree…

Answered: Raquel is an agent for Occasion…

Similar questions

Apollina, a successful model and actress, hires Isaac, an experienced Hollywood agent, to negotiate her movie deals. Isaac is on a golf course with Eunice, an executive at a Hollywood Studio, and the two get into a physical fight regarding Apollina's demands. Eunice sues Isaac for damages related to the fight. Who is responsible for Eunice's damages? Q Isaac because he was acting as an agent on behalf of Apollina. O Both Apollina and Isaac because they were both involved. Apollina, because she sent Isaac. O Neither Isaac nor Apollina if Eunice was acting as the Hollywood Studio's agent. O Isaac is responsible for his own lorts.
CEO was convinced by his employee, M. Ploy, that a coworker, A. Cused, had been stealing money from the company. At lunch that day in the company cafeteria, CEO discharges Cused from her employment, accuses her of stealing from the company, searches through her purse over her objections, and finally forcibly escorts her to his office to await the arrival of the police, which he has his secretary summon. Cused is indicted for embezzlement but subsequently is acquitted upon establishing her innocence. What rights, if any, does Cused have against CEO?
Abigail is in the business of selling fine antiques. Abigail purchased an antique desk for $5,000 from Jackson, and gave a promissory note for payment. Concerned that Jackson might not accept the note, Abigail had her friend Catalina sign the promissory note as well. Jackson accepted the note as payment. Two weeks later, Jackson sought payment on the note. Abigail told Jackson that she is not responsible for the promissory note because Catalina signed the note too, and Jackson had to seek payment from Catalina first. Abigail also spotted a beautiful set of vintage chairs owned by Max that would be perfect for her store. Abigail wrote a $10,000 check, also signed by her business associate Orville as an accommodation party, to Max to pay for the chairs. Max presented the check to Westville Savings, the bank where Abigail has a checking account, for payment. Westville Savings dishonored the check claiming Abigail had insufficient funds. Who is liable for these negotiable…
Broker Juanita is in a single agent relationship with Seller Mike when one of Juanita's sponsored sales associates brings a buyer to the transaction. Select the statement that indicates what Juanita will need to do with respect to her relationship with Seller Mike if the buyer remains in a transaction broker relationship with the sponsored sales associate. No further actions are needed with respect to Mike's relationship. move Mike to a transaction broker relationship by having him sign a consent to transaction disclosure notice move Mike to a transaction broker relationship without informing him
Columbia University brought suit against Jacobsen on two notes signed by him and his parents. The notes represented the balance of tuition he owed the University. Jacobsen counterclaimed for money damages due to Columbia’s deceit or fraudulent misrepresentation. Jacobsen argues that Columbia fraudulently misrepresented that it would teach wisdom, truth, character, enlightenment, and similar virtues and qualities. He specifically cites as support the Columbia motto: “in lumine tuo videbimus lumen” (“In your light we shall see light”); the inscription over the college chapel: “Wisdom dwelleth in the heart of him that hath understanding”; and various excerpts from its brochures, catalogues, and a convocation address made by the University’s president. Jacobsen, a senior who was not graduated because of poor scholastic standing, claims that the University’s failure to meet its promises made through these quotations constituted fraudulent misrepresentation or deceit. Decision?
Bill was appointed by Melinda to buy a painting at not more than $1 million. Bill eventually bought the painting for $1.2 million. Melinda wished to ratify Bill's act. Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Melinda could ratify if she did so soon after Bill's unauthorised act. Melinda could not ratify because Bill disobeyed her instructions. Bill had actual authority since he was appointed by Melinda to buy the painting. Melinda could still sue Bill for the price difference after ratifying his unauthorised act.
Bob, an engineer, is a new employee at Airbag Industries, which specializes in manufacturing automotive airbags. Before his employment, Bob is required to sign various documents indicating that he would have access to confidential information related to Airbag Industries' business practices, customer lists, and other information that must remain confidential. It further provided that any new developments created by Bob would be the property of Airbag Industries. Further, it provided that if Bob left the company he could not compete against the company in the United States for 10 years. Bob leaves three years later to set up his own airbag company. What intellectual property issues are involved in this scenario?
A co-worker of Illinois licensee Mona shared a client’s confidential information with her and asked Mona not to tell anyone. Instead of keeping it to herself, Mona gave the information to another licensee. Which statutory duty has been breached? Adhere to the brokerage agreement’s terms Employ reasonable skill and care in performing brokerage services for the client Keep all confidential information provided by the client confidential Serve the client’s best interests
Dorian breeds Scottish Fold kittens and informs Stevie that she is a cat breeder. Stevie says she is interested in purchasing one of her kittens. Dorian calls Stevie a month later and says Stevie’s kitten is ready for pickup and Stevie owes her $1,000. Stevie refuses, stating they did not have a valid contract. Dorian states they did have a valid contract. Who is correct?
Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.
Jackson is a car purchasing agent for Highway Motors, a used car dealer. Jackson attends wholesale auto auctions and notices that some autos have consistently greater demand and higher prices. Jackson forms a car purchasing partnership with Viva Inc. to buy these cars from "for sale by owner" advertisements and then sell them in Viva's name at the auto auctions where Jackson purchases them for Highway. Discuss if Jackson has violated any duty he owes Highway Motors.
Mark Bradshaw, an agent for National Foundation Life Insurance Co. (NFLIC), tried to sell a health insurance policy to Bobby Reed. Bradshaw told Reed that his health insurance coverage would begin upon signing some forms and paying the first premium. On January 7, Reed signed but did not read the forms, which included language stating that Reed understood that Bradshaw could not change any NFLIC policy or make any policy effective, that the policy would not be effective until actually issued by NFLIC, and that it could take up to two weeks for Reed’s application to be processed and the policy issued. NFLIC received Reed’s application, including his payment for the first premium, on January 12. On January 19, NFLIC called Reed’s home and was informed he had a heart attack on January 15. NFLIC declined to issue the policy to Reed. On what grounds did Reed sue Bradshaw? Was Reed’s suit against Bradshaw successful?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS