Bert and Ernie collaborate to defraud Oscar, who is induced to give Bert a note payable to Bert’s order. Bert indorses the note for value to Big Bird, an HDC. Later, Big Bird sells the note to Ernie (Bert's co-conspirator). Under the shelter principle, a.Ernie's right to repurchase the note from Big Bird is limited. b.Ernie cannot acquire HDC rights in the note. c.Ernie attains HDC status by acquiring the note. d.the principal amount of the note is sheltered without recourse.

Bert and Ernie, the famed team, conspire to deceive none other than the cantankerous Oscar in a…

Answered: Bert and Ernie collaborate to defraud…

Similar questions

Jarvis Enterprises ordered 50 boxes of blueberries from Agricultural Wholesalers, Inc. Agriculture delivered 50 boxes of blackberries. Jarvis rejected the blackberries and attempted to contact Agriculture. After many unsuccessful attempts, Jarvis decided to sell the blackberries to Cold Ice Cream Co. for $500. Jarvis was ready to forward the money after deducting its expenses and a commission to Agriculture, but when Agriculture learned the sale price, it objected. Agriculture feels that the blackberries had a fair market value of $1,200, and that Jarvis sold the blackberries too cheaply. Discuss the legal rights and duties of Jarvis in this situation.
Why does the agent have personal liability when the principal is undisclosed?
Dorian breeds Scottish Fold kittens and informs Stevie that she is a cat breeder. Stevie says she is interested in purchasing one of her kittens. Dorian calls Stevie a month later and says Stevie’s kitten is ready for pickup and Stevie owes her $1,000. Stevie refuses, stating they did not have a valid contract. Dorian states they did have a valid contract. Who is correct?
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
The Madariagas owned a restaurant where they served " Albert's Famous Mexican Hot Sauce . " They entered into a contract to sell the restaurant and the formula for the secret sauce to Morris . Although Morris paid the agreed - upon price , the sellers refused to give him the recipe unless he also paid them lifetime royalties for the salsa . Which of these remedies should Morris seek : expectation , restitution , specific performance , or reformation ? Why ?
The statute of frauds does NOT cover which of the following contracts? Bridgeby enters into a contract for the sale of her house. Ruelle and Randolph enter into a pre-nuptial agreement. O Quincy accepts Cleo's offer to buy from Cleo her couch for the price of $4,000. Jasper, the executor of the estate of Gabrielle's dead cousin, agrees with Gabrielle that Gabrielle will pay a debt of that estate: Gabrielle will inherit three-fourths of the estate, with the rest going to various charities. O For the price of $599. Millie enters into a contract with a merchant, Reesa, to buy from Reesa some wrenches with an estimated barter value of approximately $620.
A consumer entered into an agreement with Rent-It Corporation for the rental of a television set at a charge of $17 per week. The agreement also provides that if the renter chooses to rent the set for seventy-eight consecutive weeks, title would be transferred. The consumer now contends that the agreement was really a sales agreement, not a lease, and therefore is a credit sale subject to the Truth-in-Lending Act. Explain whether the consumer is correct.
The standard of reivew used by the Connecticut Supreme Court in determining whether the takings were constitutional under the 5th Amendment was: a. The takings were reasonably necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. b. The takings were substantially necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use. c. There was clear and convincing evidence that the economic benefits of City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass. d. The evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt that the economic benefits of the City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.
Testator gives property to Tim in trust for Barney’s benefit, providing that Barney cannot anticipate the income by assignment or pledge. Barney borrows money from Linda, assigning his future income under the trust for a stated period. Can Linda obtain any judicial relief to prevent Barney from collecting this income? Why or why not?
Under our NCC, an heir may institute an action for rescission of a rescissible contract in his capacity as a representative or successor-in-interest of a person who suffers from lesion or of the creditor who is defrauded. Suppose, however, that it can be established that the decedent, during his lifetime, entered into a contract with another in order to defraud him of his legitime, can he institute an action for the rescission of such contract after the death of the decedent?
Xavier and Adam enter into a written contract for the sale of DJ equipment. Their contract states that risk of loss shall pass to the buyer at the time the contract is signed. Since this is contrary to Article 2 of the UCC, this clause is unenforceable. True False
Assume an agent is given authority by the principal to sell a property. The principal only states that the agent may sell the property and the agent is given no further instructions. The agent reasonably believes that it will be necessary to perform $10,000 worth of improvements on the property in order to sell it. Therefore, the agent contracts to have these improvements made. He/she then sells the property. The principal believes that the improvements were not authorized and refuses to reimburse the agent for the expenses associated with the sale. Discuss the rights and liabilities of the principal and agent. Should the principal be forced to reimburse the agent? If the principal continues to refuse to reimburse the agent, what action may be taken by the agent? If the parties were to engage in a lawsuit, who would win? Why? If the answer depends on information not provided in the scenario, specify what further information one would need to render a firm opinion.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

	a.	Ernie's right to repurchase the note from Big Bird is limited.
	b.	Ernie cannot acquire HDC rights in the note.
	c.	Ernie attains HDC status by acquiring the note.
	d.	the principal amount of the note is sheltered without recourse.