Steve purchases a new Iphone for Carla without her knowledge but asks Verizon to hold it until Carla goes in and picks it up. Carla finds out about the purchase after it has occurred and goes into Verizon and gets the new Iphone. Has Carla ratified the unauthorized purchase? Has an agency relationship been created? If so, what kind?

Steve purchases a new Iphone for Carla without her knowledge but asks Verizon to hold it until Carla goes in and picks it up. Carla finds out about the purchase after it has occurred and goes into Verizon and gets the new Iphone. Has Carla ratified the unauthorized purchase? Has an agency relationship been created? If so, what kind?

Similar questions

The delivery of documents that represent the rights to property can be sufficient to transfer that property to the recipient (?) strickly in your words and answer should be in detail. do not use AI or try to repharase it.
Apollina, a successful model and actress, hires Isaac, an experienced Hollywood agent, to negotiate her movie deals. Isaac is on a golf course with Eunice, an executive at a Hollywood Studio, and the two get into a physical fight regarding Apollina's demands. Eunice sues Isaac for damages related to the fight. Who is responsible for Eunice's damages? Q Isaac because he was acting as an agent on behalf of Apollina. O Both Apollina and Isaac because they were both involved. Apollina, because she sent Isaac. O Neither Isaac nor Apollina if Eunice was acting as the Hollywood Studio's agent. O Isaac is responsible for his own lorts.
Chris bought his son a new bicycle from his local bike shop. Less than a week later, the bicycle’s handlebar broke while the boy was riding. This caused the boy to fall on concrete and break several teeth that required surgery. Chris wants to sue the manufacturer for compensation but is told that the shop merely imported the bicycle - which was manufactured overseas. Required: Explain to Chris whether he is able to take legal action for a breach of the ACL. Refer to law.
Nelson took her computer to ABC Computer for repairs. ABC repaired the computer at a cost of $350 and informed Nelson that her computer was ready. Before Nelson came to pick up her computer, ABC was burglarized and Nelson's computer was taken. ABC had a commonly-used alarm system that was operating properly on the night of the burglary, and all the doors and windows were properly secured. Nelson sued ABC for the cost of the computer. ABC denied any liability and counterclaimed for the $350 in repairs. Who will win? HINT: Address the Bailment Issue.Please use the IRAC format Issue: Call of the Question Rule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the question Analysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presented Conclusion: Answer to the Issue
If Barney’s employer withholds $11,928 for federal taxes, which is 14% of his gross annual salary, then would Barney owe additional taxes by April 15th of the next year or would he receive a refund, and in either case, by how much?
Reed, a manager for XYZ Products, issued company checks to pay his personal debts. So that no one in the company would know what he was doing, he disguised the name of the payees. For example, to pay his American Credit Card bill, he issued the XYZ check to “American.” XYZ Products sued the recipients of the checks, such as American Credit Card, demanding that the funds be returned. The trial court ruled against XYZ Products concluding that the Defendant-Payee, American Credit Card, was a holder in due course and thus took the checks free of any claims or defenses. Was the trial court correct in ruling that American Credit Card is a holder in due course? Why? What law is applicable? Can Reed be held criminally liable for his actions? Why or why not? Can Reed be civilly liable for his actions? To whom might Reed be liable and for what? 4. What is the business lesson to be learned from this case? Is this a fair result based on public policy constructs applicable to property…
What did Pavlo do that he thought would prevent MCI ( his employer) from coming after him if he got caught? What did Pavlo do that he thought would prevent MCI ( his employer) from coming after him if he got caught? Made secret recordings. Made copies of the general ledger. Gathered information about what his employer was telling him to do so that he had leverage against his employer. Asked his employees to lie for him.
Steven, an accountant, returning from his office, calls into a pub for a relaxing drink. He bumps into Paul, an old school friend, whom he has not seen for many years. During the course of the conversation over a number of pints, it emerges that Paul has recently inherited a substantial sum of money and is interested in investing in local businesses. Steven mentions that one of his clients, Precarious Ltd, is seeking financial backing and would make an attractive investment. By chance, he has a copy of the company’s accounts in his briefcase which he gives to Paul. Relying on these accounts, Paul invests £10,000 in Precarious Ltd, but loses everything when Precarious goes into liquidation six months later. In fact, the accounts had been prepared negligently and did not reflect the parlous state of the company’s affairs. Advise Paul.
Write response to: An airplane crashes at night in an isolated area. It is very cold and rescue is not likely until daylight, so the survivors break into a summer cottage and use the food and blankets in the cottage to comfort the injured and sustain themselves until help arrives. What defense can the survivors use if charged with burglary?
A co-worker of Illinois licensee Mona shared a client’s confidential information with her and asked Mona not to tell anyone. Instead of keeping it to herself, Mona gave the information to another licensee. Which statutory duty has been breached? Adhere to the brokerage agreement’s terms Employ reasonable skill and care in performing brokerage services for the client Keep all confidential information provided by the client confidential Serve the client’s best interests
Kayla, a property owner, loses an acre of her land to adverse possession. She is surprised this was even possible. You explain to her that, even though she owns the property, property can be lost even without the owner's consent through: involuntary alienation voluntary alienation private grants land trust
The third-party doctrine says that information voluntary given to a third party removes any "reasonable expectation of privacy" in that data and defeats the requirement for a search warrant. O True O False