Answered: Read Herr v Bourne, 2021 ABQB 478… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

Read Herr v Bourne, 2021 ABQB 478 (CanLII). Which equitable remedy did the Court grant the Plaintiff? (enter the two words)
Answer:
Air

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

What is the orbita dicta in hoyts v spencer case 1919.
Which of the following health policy provisions states that the producer does NOT have the authority to change the policy or wave any of its provisions? O A Time Limit on Certain Defenses OB. OC OD. Reinstatement Entire Contract Change of Beneficiary MM QUATE Ahiler 372-256-906
Palatka Costumes & Caps LLC ("PC & C") is a large props company formed in 1957, and Frodo Flags Corporation is a small, local flag manufacturer formed in 2015. These two businesses never had any dealings with each other until they recently entered into a contract, with terms all drafted by PC & C. The contract provides that PC & C shall purchase 1,000 flags that Frodo Flags will specially design for PC & C. The contract further provides that PC & C has the right to initiate, on a weekly basis, purchase orders of up to 100 flags until the contract's total number of flag purchases - 1,000 flags has been met. Also, the contract includes a clause stating that PC & C can cancel its obligation to pay for the remaining flags at any time if any Frodo Flags shipment does not arrive on the exact day as stated in a particular purchase order; this last provision is included in the contract even though time was of little importance to PC & C. W The first shipment of 100 flags arrives a day late,…
I am not sure about the answer for this question The facts of a case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows: Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favor of M.C.R. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living with their daughter. Johnston led them to believe that the document was an unimportant amendment to an existing mortgage when it was a second substantial mortgage on their home. Neither read the document nor questioned it. When the payments were in arrears, the mortgagee took an action for foreclosure (to take their home). Mr. and Mrs. H. pleaded non-est factum. Would this defense succeed? Why or why not? Explain your response
What did Stephen, Mason and Jacob JJ hold in respect of DTR Nominee's claim against Mona Homes in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it and DTR Nominees was not, at that time, ready, will and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract but DTR Nominees could not terminate because it was not, at that time, ready, willing and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract and DTR Nominees had the right to terminate. Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it, but they had seriously breached an intermediate term.
What is the rules established under the case law of Buckley & Young Ltd v CIR (1978) 3 NZTC 61,271 (CA)?
Warranty and strict liability represent two causes of action, often relied upon by plaintiffs who pursue recovery in a product liability case. Describe the two legal theories by making reference to the elements that need be proven; the obstacles with which a plaintiff may be confronted; the recoveries that be sought; and finally, the nature of the cause of action; hint from what discipline of law does each theory arise
If a minor purchase a $150.00 pair of designer blue jeans the merchant may be unable to enforce this contract because: a) the jeans were a necessity. b) clothes are a statutory contract. c) designer jeans are a luxury. d) only emancipated minors wear jeans. 2. An adult who intentionally drinks so much liquor as to have their judgment impaired will a) easily defeat a contract they entered in to while drunk b) have no chance of winning under any circumstances. c) probably lose, voluntary intoxication is usually a poor defense. 3. Which of the following must a person possess to have contractual capacity? a) Comprehend the nature of the Contract b) Comprehend the purpose of the Contract c) Comprehend the consequences of the Contract d) All of the above are required
State the judicial powers listed in the Constitution. Explain judicial review in detail and its origins in Marbury v. Madison.
Describe the holding in Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff; and explain why the Supreme Court cited the case in its holding in Kelo v. City of New London
Pls help ASAP