In Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc., the Md Ct App held that for plaintiff tomake out a prima facie case, she must show that (select the bestanswer):O the plaintiff did not cause the violation of the ordinance, that plaintiff did notcontribute to the injury, and that the injury was suffered by a contractortrying to repair the walkway to the houseif not repaired, a violation of an ordinance may occur, an injury is possible ifthe condition of the house is not repaired, and that the legislature sought toincrease the tax base of the rental house or unit involvedOthere is a violation of an ordinance, that the violation proximately caused aninjury, and that the injured plaintiff was in a class of people intended to beprotected by the ordinanceO it was not her fault that the paint in the dwelling was peeling, that thepeeling paint was lead paint, and that there was someone who was injured inthe past by this landlord

Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc. involves a legal context where a plaintiff seeks to establish a…

Answered: n Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc., the…

Similar questions

am. 119.
In what has been subsequently known as the 'narrow rule', the House of Lords found that a duty of care exist even if the defendant was not present. Accordingly, manufacturers of goods must take reasonable steps to ensure that their products do not cause injury to those that subsequently come into contact with them. Lord Atkin went on to propose a general maxim of law known as the 'neighbour principle' which would apply generally and preclude the claimant needing to bring the facts of their case within those of a previous case. REQUIRED: Concisely sets out what the claimant has to prove in order to succeed in an action in Negligence. 2. Comment on the situation where the chain of event is broken by an intervening cause.
John Beck was injured at the Drive-Thru at Taco Bell when an impatient driver behind him fired his gun at John’s car. When would Taco Bell be liable for John’s injuries? a. Taco Bell would be liable if John was negligent. b. Taco Bell is always liable for John’s injuries because he is an invitee. c. Taco Bell could never be liable for John’s injuries. d. Taco Bell would be liable if the firing of the shot was foreseeable.
Case4 One afternoon, the plaintiff (P) and her husband were out driving for picnic together with their three children. They pull-over in a lay-by, a designated pave area beside a main road where cars can stop temporarily, for a picnic and the plaintiff took one of the children across the road to pick flowers. The defendant, Mr. Berry (D), was driving recklessly and crashed into the couple’s van, where the plaintiff’s husband and the other children were preparing. The plaintiff’s husband was seriously hurt by the crash and died at the scene a few hours later while most of the children suffered injuries. The plaintiff witnessed the entire event and its aftermath, developed long-term “morbid depression”, consequently. Please state the four basic elements of negligence. Plaintiff sued Mr. Berry for the cost and damages as a result from nervous shock that she suffered due to the negligence of the Defendant. Please state your reasons
Assume for the purposes of this part of the question that Cherie is able to play, but trips and falls on some loose flooring and twists her ankle badly. One of the council employees tells her that the flooring has been loose for some time and should have been repaired. Explain the following: What is the legal case that Cherie could take against the Council? (Give full details of the principles and how they would apply in this scenario). If Cherie commenced an action, what remedies would she be seeking?
Read Herr v Bourne, 2021 ABQB 478 (CanLII). Which equitable remedy did the Court grant the Plaintiff? (enter the two words) Answer: Air
Maranda says that she is fed up with the way a certain employer in Kennesaw treats employees and that she is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. Although she is not a lawyer, Maranda believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that a court will appreciate her attempt to make things better for the employees involved. Can Maranda act as plaintiff for the employees? Yes, so long as they file no objection Yes, so long as she gets permission slips from them No because venue is lacking No because she lacks standing Yes, so long as she gives any money he receives to them
Discuss, In arbitration, what is the standard of proof in a discharge case?
Find a case involving an allegation of a breach of contract and include a brief summary of the facts, the court’s decision and reasoning, and whether one should agree with the court’s decision.
Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insurer? OA. To inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of loss OC. To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a daim for which the insured has been found legally responsible OD
Locate Alberta's Court of Justice Civil Procedure Regulation. Pursuant to Section 3(2)(b) of the Act, a civil claim must clearly state? Answer:
5

SEE MORE QUESTIONS