If the higher value of KM resulting in the new plot ( red curb ) is due to the presence of an enzyme inhibitor is inhibitor reversible or irreversible? And why? ### Educational Content: Michaelis-Menten Plot Analysis**Figure Description:**This figure represents a Michaelis-Menten plot demonstrating enzyme kinetics. The plot is generated using a Km (Michaelis constant) value of 0.05 mM and a Vmax (maximum reaction velocity) value of 0.309407. **Data Table Explanation:**The table includes columns labeled as follows:- **[Enz]**: Concentration of enzyme, with values: 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3.- **Vo (Initial Velocity)**: Different initial velocities corresponding to enzyme concentrations: 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.09, 0.11, 0.13, 0.16.- **Calc Vo (Calculated Vo)**: Computed Vo values: 0.037997, 0.071402, 0.090494.- **C (Substrate Concentration)** and **deltaVz**: Further details of substrate concentration and delta Vz calculations not fully visible.Key constant values used in the calculations:- **Km**: 0.05- **Vmax**: 0.309407**Graph Details:**The graph plots the initial velocity (Vo) against enzyme concentration. It includes:- **Data Points**: Represented by blue diamonds, indicating experimental measurements of initial velocity at various enzyme concentrations.- **Curve**: A red line that demonstrates the calculated Vo values based on the Michaelis-Menten equation.**Instructions:**The text instructs users that the Vmax value of 0.309407 should not be changed. Anyone replicating or analyzing this data should ensure their worksheet and graph resemble the figure shown.This plot is useful for understanding how the enzyme velocity changes concerning its concentration, allowing for insights into enzyme efficiency and substrate affinity. By analyzing the curve, one can determine how close the experimental data fits the theoretical model.

The concentration of irreversible inhibitor is less than the concentration of enzyme, an…

Answered: If the higher value of KM resulting in…

If the higher value of KM resulting in the new plot ( red curb ) is due to the presence of an enzyme inhibitor is inhibitor reversible or irreversible? And why?

Biochemistry

9th Edition

ISBN:9781319114671

Author:Lubert Stryer, Jeremy M. Berg, John L. Tymoczko, Gregory J. Gatto Jr.

Publisher:Lubert Stryer, Jeremy M. Berg, John L. Tymoczko, Gregory J. Gatto Jr.

Chapter1: Biochemistry: An Evolving Science

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A particular enzyme-catalyzed reaction has an apparent Vmax = 9.00 nmol s-1 and α' = 3.00 when 2.00 µmol L-1 inhibitor X is present and uncompetitively inhibiting the reaction. Calculate Vmax for the uninhibited reaction in nmol s-1.
Use the relationships revealed by a Lineweaver-Burk plot and the table of enzyme performance to calculate the Vmax and Km of the enzyme with no inhibitor. with inhibitor A, and with inhibitor B. [S] (uM) Vo (umol/min); w/ no inhib. Vo (umol/min); w/ inhib. A Vo (umol/min); w/ inhib. B 10 6.3 5.1 4.0 40 18.4 15.8 11.8 100 29.9 27.0 19.1 150 34.7 32.0 22.2 No inhib. Vmax= Km= Inhib. A Vmax= Km= Inhib. B Vmax= Km=
An enzyme is mutated such that the KM of the mutated enzyme is lower than the KM of the original enzyme. Which of the following statements is true (select all correct answers)? Question 2 options: If the original enzyme and the mutated enzyme are mixed with the same concentration of substrate, the mutated enzyme will have v0 closer to Vmax (hint: consider the Michaelis-Menten equation) The effect of a particular competitive inhibitor will be less on the mutated enzyme than it is on the original enzyme (hint: consider the reaction scheme for a competitive inhibitor) The effect of a particular uncompetitive inhibitor will be less on the mutated enzyme than it is on the original enzyme (hint: consider the reaction scheme for an uncompetitive inhibitor) The mutated enzyme has higher affinity for the substrate than the original enzyme does
Using equilibrium argument, why does Km apparently increase, decrease or stay the same in uncompetitive inhibition?
Based on your Lineweaver-Burk plot, what is the mode of PaESBL-1 inhibition by NSAMB? What is the equation for the double-reciprocal plot at 20 nMnM NAMB?
What type of inhibition is being shown in the following graphs?
Suppose that you have isolated the enzyme sucrase (able to hydrolyze sucrose into glucose and fructose), and you wish to determine the nature of inhibitor A for this enzyme. You have prepared five different concentrations of substrate (sucrose), and five different concentrations of inhibitor A (plus the control, with zero mM of inhibitor A). The following Table lists the inhibitor A concentrations [I], substrate concentrations [S], and resulting enzyme velocities (Vo) for all six of these experiments: [I] [S] Vo 1/[S] 1/ Vo 0 mM 0.1 mM 0.333333333333 mM per minute 0 mM 0.2 mM 0.50 0 mM 0.3 mM 0.60 0 mM 0.4 mM 0.666666666667 0 mM 0.5 mM 0.714285714286 0.1 mM 0.1 mM 0.20 0.1 mM 0.2 mM 0.333333333333 0.1 mM 0.3 mM 0.428571428571 0.1 mM 0.4 mM 0.50 0.1 mM 0.5 mM 0.555555555556 0.20 mM 0.1 mM 0.142857142857…
In the scheme below which represents the mechanism of action for a large number of enzymes: A+B⟺AB⟶C The steady state approximation is reached when: d[AB]/dt≈0 k2≫k1 k−1≫k1 k−1=k1
An experiment was carried out to measure the reaction rate of hydrolysis of acetylcholme (substrate) with serum enzymes (Eadie, 1949). In the experiment, two experiments were conducted, namely experiment 1 without using a prostigmine inhibitor and experiment 2 using a prostigmine inhibitor at 1.5 x 10^-7 mol/l. the data obtained are: a. Is prostigmine competitive or noncompetitive inhibitor? b. determine the value of km and rmax for the two experiments, compare
The table below lists experimental conditions that can be applied to a reaction catalyzed by a hypothetical Michaelis–Menten enzyme. For each experimental condition described, complete the table to indicate as precisely as possible the effect (no change, half as large doubles, increases, decreases) on the maximal velocity, Vmax, and Michaelis constant, KM, of the hypothetical enzyme.
Intramitochondrial ATP concentrations are about 5 mM, and phos- phate concentration is about 10 mM. If ADP is five times more abundant than AMP, calculate the molar concentrations of ADP and AMP at an energy charge of 0.85. Calculate AG for ATP hydrolysis at 37 °C under these conditions. The energy charge is the concentra- tion of ATP plus half the concentration of ADP divided by the total adenine nucleotide concentration: [ATP] + 1/2[ADP] [ATP] + [ADP] + [AMP]
Suppose that you have isolated the enzyme sucrase (able to hydrolyze sucrose into glucose and fructose), and you wish to determine the nature of inhibitor B for this enzyme. You have prepared five different concentrations of substrate (sucrose), and five different concentrations of inhibitor B (plus the control, with zero mM of inhibitor B). The following Table lists the inhibitor B concentrations [I], substrate concentrations [S], and resulting enzyme velocities (Vo) for all six of these experiments: [I] [S] Vo 1/[S] 1/ Vo 0 mM 0.1 mM 0.333333333333 mM per minute 0 mM 0.2 mM 0.50 0 mM 0.3 mM 0.60 0 mM 0.4 mM 0.666666666667 0 mM 0.5 mM 0.714285714286 0.1 mM 0.1 mM 0.25 0.1 mM 0.2 mM 0.333333333333 0.1 mM 0.3 mM 0.375 0.1 mM 0.4 mM 0.40 0.1 mM 0.5 mM 0.416666666667 0.20 mM 0.1 mM 0.20 0.20 mM…