BUSINESS LAW 101 I am trying to do an I.R.A.C. Brief a Case from business Law. So far I have this: David KRASNER, Plaintiff, v. HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser in his personal and official capacities, Defendants. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 7, 2010. 680 F. Supp. 2d 502 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) FACTS David KRASNER is suing HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser, his employer, for sexual discrimination under Title VII under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Krasner clams Sexual Harassment towards women runs rampant in his work environment. No violation was found from the investigation that was conducted. After which he was fired prompting him to request a right to sue letter from the EEOC. He was granted the letter and proceeded with the lawsuit. ISSUE A person must be a victim of Sexual Harassment in order to clam and sue for sexual harassment. MY QUESTION: (The Aplication part of it.) Below is the link to the Case. This part is asking this>>>>>>"the rule or rules of law to the facts of the case is an important part of briefing. Look for specific facts in the case to justify the conclusion of the court. This is the analytical aspect" https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1526596/krasner-v-hsh-nordbank-ag/ Thank you very much.

Practical Management Science

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

BUSINESS LAW 101

I am trying to do an I.R.A.C. Brief a Case from business Law.

So far I have this:

David KRASNER, Plaintiff, v. HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser in his personal and official capacities, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 7, 2010.

680 F. Supp. 2d 502 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

FACTS

David KRASNER is suing HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser, his employer, for sexual discrimination under Title VII under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Krasner clams Sexual Harassment towards women runs rampant in his work environment. No violation was found from the investigation that was conducted. After which he was fired prompting him to request a right to sue letter from the EEOC. He was granted the letter and proceeded with the lawsuit.

ISSUE

A person must be a victim of Sexual Harassment in order to clam and sue for sexual harassment.

MY QUESTION: (The Aplication part of it.) Below is the link to the Case.

This part is asking this>>>>>>"the rule or rules of law to the facts of the case is an important part of briefing. Look for specific facts in the case to justify the conclusion of the court. This is the analytical aspect"

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1526596/krasner-v-hsh-nordbank-ag/

Thank you very much.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions