Business Law Question for discussion. Cindy, a retired magazine editor, has been engaged by Microsoft to write, format and edit their monthly newsletter. She spends considerable time at Microsoft interviewing employees for pieces that she then writes for the newsletter and utilizes their supplies and resources to format and disseminate the newsletter. Is Cindy an employee or independent contractor? If Cindy's newsletter calls Salley, the CFO, a crook, could Microsoft be sued? If so, what would the cause of action be for?

Business Law Question for discussion. Cindy, a retired magazine editor, has been engaged by Microsoft to write, format and edit their monthly newsletter. She spends considerable time at Microsoft interviewing employees for pieces that she then writes for the newsletter and utilizes their supplies and resources to format and disseminate the newsletter. Is Cindy an employee or independent contractor? If Cindy's newsletter calls Salley, the CFO, a crook, could Microsoft be sued? If so, what would the cause of action be for?

Similar questions

need help asap
Mr Grump is a former employee of Fashion retail store. He was recently dismissed on grounds of committing misconduct in the workplace. Mr Grump, being very resentful over his dismissal, decided to exact revenge. He contacted his best friend Mr Y who has knowledge on hacking. Mr Grump with the help of Mr Y hacked into the Fashion online financial systems and erased important digital data. Determine whether the Fashion retail store can institute legal action, and if so, on what grounds. Make reference to relevant case law and legislation in your answer.
Part 1. Eric has applied for the position of a reservations clerk in your hotel. The individual has no experience, but he types quickly and accurately and has good listening skills as well as a pleasant speaking voice. Eric has very limited eyesight. He is considered to be "legally blind" and is covered by ADA. Discuss ways in which management in your hotel could accommodate Eric's disability with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Directions: Read the following rule and hypothetical situation. Using your knowledge of legal analysis: 1. Break the rule down to its elements 2. Present a comprehensive phrasing of the issue/s involved and, 3. Applying the rule to the facts provided, analyze the rule as to the given hypothetical 4. Conclusion: Did Sally Violate Rule 4? Rule 4 Elements of Rule 4 + Facts + Issue/s + Application = Conclusions A Major Disciplinary Infraction for Possession of a Weapon in school is a violation that occurs in school and severely interferes with the learning and safety of others, and is of a threatening or harmful nature. Just before high school started, students Sally and Nick were in a heated argument in the schoolyard when Sally flashed what appeared to be a gun to Nick and said, “You better stay away from me.” This was witnessed by several students, one of whom squealed on Sally, who was later found with an airsoft gun in her purse.
Recording Under an Accident and Health policy, which of the following persons has the right to change the beneficiary? O A. Applicant Insured O B. O C. O D. Beneficiary Policyowner Chat Whiteboard Code 372-256-906
Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issue
Q1. To prevail in an action brought under common law, the plaintiff must show all of the following except: (in your response, explain the burdens of proof for a third-party plaintiff under common law). Q2. Kerry CPA is the auditor for Sammy Corp. During the audit, Kerry discovers a material misstatement in Sammy's financial statements. Sammy's management tells Kerry that if the misstatement is corrected or if Kerry issues an opinion that indicates there is a material misstatement, Sammy Corp. will likely have to declare bankruptcy and thousands of employees will lose their jobs. Which of the following statements is true if the misstatement is not corrected and Kerry issues an unqualified opinion on Sammy's financial statements? (in your response, identify the court case that makes Kerry liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud).
Jane has just been hired as the head of the Payroll Department at R&S Electronics Service Company, a firm of 75 employees. She was hired by Eddie, the General Manager of the company, who informed her of the need for maintaining strict confidentiality regarding employee salaries and pay scales. He also informed her that he fired the previous Payroll Department head for breaking that confidentiality by discussing employees’ salaries. She was also formally introduced to Brad, the owner, who told her to see him if she has any questions or problems. Both Brad and Eddie made her feel welcome. After three months of employment, Jane begins to wonder why Greg makes so much more in commissions than the other service technicians. She assumes that he must be highly qualified and must work rapidly because she has overheard Brad commending Greg on his performance on several occasions. She has also noticed Brad, Eddie, and Greg having lunch together frequently. One day, Eddie gives Jane the stack…
Sally's apartment is burglarized while she is on vacation, and a few pieces of jewelry she left at home are stolen. She files an insurance claim, stating that all of her jewelry was taken. Which of the following best describes the act that Sally is engaging in?
CEO terminated Linda and terminated five childcare workers, resulting in a violation of the state law regulating ratio requirements. Linda's employer did not give her a reason why she was fired. Linda worked for the corporation for 10 years and consistently had very high scores on her performance reviews before her termination. Linda did not have an employment contract. What are examples of the causes of action that Linda could bring against her former employer and the potential outcomes?
Did managers disregard proper procedure when they disciplined Mr. Haier? Justify your answer. How much weight should arbitrators give procedural propriety or impropriety when deciding a case like this one?
A whistleblower uses nonpublic knowledge or even top-secret knowledge to make illegal or unethical circumstances in a company public. Each employee signs in his contract a Non- Disclosure-Agreement to protect data and insider knowhow of the company. Under which circumstances is whistleblowing ethical, und which circumstances it is not ethical? Support your argumentation with the congruent ethical theories.