CEO terminated Linda and terminated five childcare workers, resulting in a violation of the state law regulating ratio requirements. Linda's employer did not give her a reason why she was fired. Linda worked for the corporation for 10 years and consistently had very high scores on her performance reviews before her termination. Linda did not have an employment contract. What are examples of the causes of action that Linda could bring against her former employer and the potential outcomes?

CEO terminated Linda and terminated five childcare workers, resulting in a violation of the state law regulating ratio requirements. Linda's employer did not give her a reason why she was fired. Linda worked for the corporation for 10 years and consistently had very high scores on her performance reviews before her termination. Linda did not have an employment contract. What are examples of the causes of action that Linda could bring against her former employer and the potential outcomes?

Similar questions

Mark Clapp and Albert DiBrito worked for the Public Safety Department (PSD) in St. Joseph, Michigan. Clapp was the director and, DiBrito was the deputy director. They were under the supervision of the city manager. One day, Clapp told Tom Vaught, a PSD employee, that the previous city manager had hired DiBrito only because DİBrito had been investigating the city manager for possible wrongdoing. Clapp said that DiBrito had dropped his investigation in exchange for the deputy director position. DiBrito learned of Clapp's statement and filed a formal complaint against him on another matter with Richard Lewis, the current city manager. The investigation that followed revealed management problems within the PSD. A consultant hired by the city concluded that Clapp's remarks about DiBrito had been "inappropriate statements for a commanding officer to make regarding a second in charge." However, the consultant also identified issues regarding DiBrito's "honesty, inappropriate statements to…
Some states recognize which exemption(s) to worker termination under the at-will employment doctrine? A. public policy B. implied contract C. just cause D. All of these choices are correct.
Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)
Answer the following TRUE/FALSE questions:Redundancy is a form of dismissal The Data Protection Act 2018 applies to computer-based and electronically stored information systems onlyAn employee has a statutory right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996Common Law imposes a duty on an employer not to pass confidential information to a third party about his employeeA wrongful dismissal will occur by a breach of the employment contractUnder the Data Protection Act 2018, a claim for damages for distress can be made for data breachBiometric and genetic data, are covered under the GDPR 2016
Employee, a Muslim, is a management trainee at an airport car rental office. As part of her religious practice, employee wears a hijab (headscarf). She is told by her supervisor that the hijab does not match the uniforms she is required to wear, so she must stop wearing them or be transferred to another position with less customer interaction. Employee was later terminated as part of a company cutback. She sues for religious discrimination. Does she win? Explain.
Liability of Members Harold, Jasmine, Caesar, and Yuan form Microhard. com, LLC, a limited liability company, to sell computer hardware and software over the Internet. Microhard. com, LLC, hires Heather, a re-cent graduate of the University of Chicago and a brilliant software designer, as an employee. Heather’s job is to design and develop software that will execute a computer command when the computer user thinks of the next command he or she wants to execute on the computer. Using Heather’s research, Microhard. com, LLC, develops the Third Eye software program that does this. Microhard. com, LLC, sends Heather to the annual Comdex computer show in Las Vegas, Nevada, to unveil this revolutionary software. Heather goes to Las Vegas, and while there, she rents an automobile to get from the hotel to the computer show and to meet interested buyers at different locations in Las Vegas. While Heather is driving from her hotel to the site of the Comdex computer show, she negligently causes an…
Which of the following are required for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination? Select all that apply. 1. that her employer has 10 or more full time employees 2. that she was forced to work in a hostile work environment. 3. that she is someone who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the “essential functions” of the employment position that such individual holds or desires. 4. that she is disabled 5. that she was subjected to unlawful discrimination because of her disability
1) What elements of the employee dishonesty exposure make it difficult to estimate the size of the loss that can occur? In what way does the fidelity exposure differ from other property exposures?
A bargaining representative election was held in Smith Electronic Company against the will of the employer. The employer threatened to terminate those employees who cast their vote during representative election. In this situation, the employer has violated: administrative regulations. the contract bar rule. the silent period. the forty-eight-hour rule.
Wyatt Earp, age 29, died on May 17, 2019. Mr. Earp was a married with no children. Hewas employed full time as a service advisor at the local Honda dealership. Mr. Earp earned$25/hour plus benefits, which included health coverage, dental coverage, and 14 days paidtime off per year. Mr. Earp and a friend would frequently go to the Real-Time Racewaytrack after hours and race go-karts.The track owners know that people frequently race cars or go karts on their track, withoutpermission, after hours. The track doesn’t want people racing on the track without itsknowledge or permission. The track is not fenced in, there are no signs on the property, nosecurity guards, and no lights on when the track is closed. Therefore, if someone is willingto transport their vehicle or go-kart over the grass field between the track and the mainroad, that person can obtain access to this track.On May 17, 2019, a track employee develops a solution to stop people from using the trackafter hours. The employee…
Briefly explain dismissal and the grounds for dismissal according to canadian law. Can you think of any relevant Canadian case law?
Presume the employee does not get the promised 11% pay raise, and a grievance is filed. What type of grievance is it likely to be? Explain.