LR

docx

School

Kenyatta University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

TAXATION

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by MasterStarOwl18

1 Domestic Violence Literature Review Student Name Institution Date:

2 Introduction Within the complex landscape of social dynamics, the issue of domestic violence stands as an unambiguous display of deeply rooted challenges within intimate relationships. A closer examination of different studies highlights the universal nature of this phenomenon and its complicated connection with various sides of human experience. This introductory exploration delves into the prevalent themes extracted from diverse literature, aiming to shed light on the multifaceted dimensions of domestic violence. In the expansive landscape of societal dynamics, domestic violence emerges as a poignant issue, reflecting underlying complexities in intimate relationships. The synthesis of insights from numerous studies paints a comprehensive picture of this prevalent societal challenge, offering a nuanced understanding of its varied dimensions. This introductory exploration seeks to unravel prevalent themes discerned from an array of literature, providing a glimpse into the intricate layers of domestic violence. Amidst the myriad dynamics that govern societal interactions, the specter of domestic violence looms large, underscoring the intricacies inherent in intimate relationships. A careful analysis of an extensive body of literature exposes the far-reaching implications of this pervasive issue, unraveling the intricate connections it maintains with diverse aspects of the human experience. This introduction sets the stage for an exploration of prevalent themes derived from a spectrum of studies, aiming to cast light on the manifold dimensions of domestic violence. Power Dynamics Understanding the dynamics of power is essential for unraveling the complexities surrounding domestic violence against women. Alhabib et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review of prevalence studies and shed light on the pervasive nature of domestic violence. Their

3 findings emphasize the unequal power structures inherent in abusive relationships and the need for interventions that address these power imbalances. The scope of domestic violence is complicatedly linked with power dynamics, therefore influencing and often dictating the interactions within intimate relationships. Scholars provide insights into the impact of domestic violence across various subjects, shedding light on less- explored areas such as men's victimization. This study endeavors to draw from diverse resources to present a comprehensive view of the effects of domestic violence in a domestic setting, avoiding the narrow focus observed in some scholarly works. Diverse approaches characterize the definition of domestic violence. The UNICEF (2000) summarizes it as any form of abuse stemming from a spouse or another household member, manifesting through harassment or violence. This inclusive definition highlights the extent of actions that can transpire within the boundaries of a domestic setting (Dasre et al., 2017). Shah et al. (2012) expand the conceptualization and emphasize the impact on an individual's psychological and physical well-being. The stimuli for these effects encompass economic and sexual dimensions, with the term often used interchangeably with abuse. Marsden (2014) directs attention to the gendered impact of domestic violence, mainly focusing on women. The United States has become a focal point, with numerous refugees seeking refuge from abuse in their home countries. This phenomenon underscores the broader societal implications and the transnational nature of domestic violence, emphasizing its repercussions on a global scale. The categorization of domestic violence involves various criteria, including causal factors and consequences. Anderson (2009) suggests that understanding the leading elements prompting these actions, such as financial disparities and sexuality, can aid in typifying domestic violence.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 Additionally, the consequences, spanning physical, psychological, economic, and spousal impacts, contribute to delineating different types of domestic violence (Anderson, 2009). In exploring power dynamics, Fletcher and Star (2018) Examine how feminist organizations affect how public policy responds to domestic abuse. By examining the impact of advocacy efforts, they highlight the crucial role of these organizations in challenging societal norms that perpetuate power imbalances. The review emphasizes how vital it is to take advocacy into account groups in shaping policies that aim to rectify existing power differentials. Anderson (2017) contributes to understanding power dynamics by integrating feminist and family violence approaches. This integration highlights the interconnectedness of gender, status, and domestic violence. The review emphasizes that a different understanding of power dynamics must consider broader societal factors that assist in continuing violence in close relationships. The comprehensive examination of power dynamics also extends to the global context. Buzawa et al. (2017) explore global responses to domestic violence, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts between criminal justice and human services. This multidisciplinary strategy acknowledges the complex nature of power dynamics and the necessity of a united front in combating domestic violence. The review of power dynamics in domestic violence draws on diverse sources to illuminate the pervasive nature of unequal power structures. It underscores the critical role of advocacy groups, the integration of feminist perspectives, and global interdisciplinary responses in addressing the root causes of domestic violence. These insights contribute to the development of more effective interventions that seek to dismantle existing power imbalances within abusive relationships.

5 Impact on Children The impact of domestic violence on children is a critical side of the broader discussion, shedding light on the profound and lasting consequences that extend beyond the immediate victims. UNICEF's comprehensive definition of domestic violence encompasses any form of abuse within a domestic setting, emphasizing the inclusivity of the term (Dasre et al., 2017). This open definition provides a foundation for understanding the problematic ways in which domestic violence affects all members of a household, including the smallest and most vulnerable, who are children. Research consistently underscores that children are not only victims of direct abuse but are also profoundly affected by witnessing domestic violence between their parents or caregivers. The term "smallest" is used to highlight the vulnerability of children in these situations, emphasizing their dependence on the familial environment for emotional and physical well-being (Wire, 2006). Hindin & Gultiano's (2006) study explores the impact of witnessing parental abuse during adolescence, revealing a correlation with the development of depressive signs in young adults. This not only highlights the psychological toll on children but also underscores the potential long-term consequences, with depressive signs often persisting into adulthood. The World Health Organization's multi-country research in 2013 adds a global perspective, indicating that almost a third of married women have been victims of spousal abuse, with implications for the children in these households (Chai et al., 2016). This highlights how widespread the problem is and the necessity of taking a comprehensive approach to solving domestic violence to break the cycle of abuse. The consequences of domestic violence on children extend beyond psychological impacts. Saifuddin et al. (2006) bring attention to the perinatal and early stages of development,

6 revealing that pregnant women subjected to domestic abuse are at a heightened risk of fetal death. This introduces a unique category of victims—those who are in the earliest phases of life. Children are not just passive recipients of domestic violence; the conflict between parents or caregivers can indirectly impact them. Prenatal exposure to domestic violence has been linked to adverse outcomes during early childhood and an increased risk of perinatal mortality (Saifuddin et al., 2006). The complex relationship between maternal well-being and fetal development underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the intergenerational impact of domestic violence. Furthermore, the World Health Organization's findings highlight that children exposed to spousal abuse are more likely to experience stunted growth, revealing the indirect effects on physical development and overall well-being (Chai et al., 2016). This complex connection between family dynamics and child outcomes emphasizes the need for interventions that consider the holistic health of all household members. The impact of domestic violence on children is multifaceted, encompassing psychological, physical, and developmental dimensions (Lloyd, 2018). The research from various sources collectively underscores the urgency of addressing domestic violence not only to protect the immediate victims but also to break the cycle of intergenerational harm (Myhill, 2017). Recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of children and the lasting consequences of exposure to domestic violence is essential for developing targeted interventions and support systems to mitigate the profound effects on the youngest members of our communities (Holt et al., 2008). Regional Variations Examining domestic violence through the lens of regional variations is crucial for developing targeted interventions that consider diverse cultural contexts. Pournaghash-Tehrani's

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 literature review on domestic violence in Iran (2011) provides a different understanding of how social and cultural elements add to the frequency of domestic violence. This study emphasizes how crucial cultural awareness is when addressing domestic violence, emphasizing that effective interventions must be tailored to specific regional contexts. Domestic violence manifests with diverse regional differences shaped by cultural, social, and economic contexts. UNICEF's report (Wire, 2006) underscores the vulnerability of children, the smallest members of the household, as primary victims. The environment in which children are raised predisposes them to domestic violence, impacting not only their physical safety but also their psychological well-being. Research by Hindin and Gultiano (2006) reveals that witnessing parental abuse during adolescence can lead to depressive signs, potentially culminating in tragic outcomes such as suicide. Saifuddin et al. (2006) extend the impact on prenatal life, highlighting that pregnant women subjected to victims of domestic violence could lose their unborn child. This introduces a new category of victims. Those in the early stages of development emphasize the far-reaching consequences of domestic violence. A gendered perspective emerges, with a focus on women as victims of domestic violence. In Turkey, Kizilgol and Ipek (2018) reveal that cultural norms contribute to high rates of violence against women, intertwining notions of masculinity with both love and abuse (Erten & Keskin, 2018). The reluctance to report cases due to embarrassment underscores the influence of cultural factors on the prevalence of domestic violence. While women are predominantly seen as victims, men also experience domestic abuse, often in silence. Hines (2011) challenges the perception that physicality protects men from abuse, highlighting the psychological impact on men subjected to domestic violence. Economic abuse, a

8 less-discussed aspect, emerges as a powerful tool for suppressing individuals and manipulating them through financial control (Smith, 2015). Kalokhe et al. (2017) contribute valuable insights by conducting a systematic review of domestic violence against women in India. This research sheds light on the unique challenges faced by women in India and underscores the need for region-specific strategies to combat domestic violence. The findings emphasize that interventions should consider the cultural differences and societal structures that contribute to the perpetuation of abuse in different regions. Kourti et al.'s study (2023) explores domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic, presenting a systematic review. The research recognizes the impact of the pandemic on the prevalence of domestic violence and underscores the importance of region-specific responses. The findings highlight variations in how different regions experienced and responded to increased domestic violence during the pandemic, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions based on regional disparities. To further understand the global landscape, Freeman (2017) explores domestic violence from a global perspective. This comprehensive approach recognizes that domestic violence manifests differently across regions due to variations in cultural norms, legal frameworks, and societal expectations (Rodrigues et al., 2017). By acknowledging these differences, interventions can be crafted to address specific challenges in each region. Intersectionality Exploring the concept of intersectionality in the context of domestic violence involves recognizing the relationship between different social identities and how they interact to form individuals' experiences. Ali, Dhingra, and McGarry's literature review (2016) delves into the

9 classifications of intimate partner violence, emphasizing the significance of considering intersectionality. This study highlights that an individual's experience of domestic violence is influenced not only by gender but also by other intersecting factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation. Domestic violence intersects with various dimensions, including gender, socioeconomic status, and cultural background. A study in Turkey (Kizilgol & Ipek, 2018) reveals that women, often victimized, are influenced by cultural norms that propagate both love and abuse as essential components of masculinity. The silence surrounding the abuse is attributed to the androcentric nature of Turkish society. Men, often overlooked as victims, experience domestic abuse with distinct consequences. Hines (2011) challenges the prevailing perception that physicality protects men, emphasizing the psychological impacts of domestic violence. Rural settings, as observed by Murty et al. (2003), can reverse traditional gender roles, with women exploiting men's physical abilities for abuse, emphasizing the need for an intersectional understanding of domestic violence. Economic abuse emerges as a powerful intersectional factor affecting individuals regardless of gender. Smith (2015) highlights how financial control is wielded as a weapon, emphasizing the role of economic power dynamics in shaping domestic violence scenarios. Afrouz, Crisp, and Taket's research (2020) on seeking help in domestic violence among Muslim women expands the understanding of intersectionality by examining experiences in both Muslim-majority and non-Muslim-majority countries. The study recognizes that the intersection of religious identity with other social identities plays a crucial role in shaping women's experiences of domestic violence and help-seeking behaviors. This underscores the need for culturally sensitive and intersectional approaches to support survivors within diverse contexts.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 The study conducted by Costa et al. (2015) on longitudinal predictors of domestic violence perpetration and victimization contributes to the intersectionality discourse by recognizing that various factors, including socioeconomic status and mental health, intersect to influence the perpetration and victimization of domestic violence over time (Tittlová & Papacek, 2018). By acknowledging the complexity of these intersections, the study advocates for holistic interventions that address multiple dimensions of individuals' lives. Showalter's literature review (2016) on women's employment and domestic violence introduces an economic dimension to intersectionality. It explores how the intersection of employment status and gender can impact vulnerability to domestic violence. Understanding the economic disparities that intersect with gender dynamics provides insights into the multifaceted nature of domestic violence experiences. Intersectionality in the context of domestic violence requires acknowledging the complex interaction of various social identities. By considering factors such as gender, race, religion, socioeconomic status, and employment, a more comprehensive understanding of domestic violence emerges (Johnson & Stylianou, 2022). Addressing the intersectional nature of domestic violence is essential for developing interventions that are inclusive, culturally competent, and capable of meeting the diverse needs of survivors across different social contexts. Employment and Empowerment Understanding the complex relationship between employment and empowerment is crucial in the context of domestic violence. Showalter's comprehensive review (2016) sheds light on the complex dynamics between women's jobs and experiences of domestic violence. The study underscores that women's economic empowerment through employment can act as both a

11 protective factor and a potential source of conflict, highlighting the different nature of this intersection. The relationship between employment, empowerment, and domestic violence is multifaceted. While employment can empower individuals, Showalter's (2016) review suggests a complex interaction between women's employment and domestic violence. Empowerment interventions, as explored by Kiani et al. (2021), become crucial avenues for addressing domestic violence, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies. Feminist organizations influence public policy responses to domestic violence (Fletcher & Star, 2018). The influence of these organizations shapes the discourse on domestic violence, highlighting the importance of advocacy in fostering change. Additionally, empowerment models, as proposed by Cattaneo and Goodman (2015), provide a framework for addressing domestic violence, emphasizing the need to empower survivors through comprehensive support systems. Kiani et al.'s systematic review (2021) on empowerment interventions to reduce domestic violence provides insights into the role of empowerment in preventing and mitigating domestic violence. The study emphasizes the potential of empowerment programs to enhance women's agency and resilience, thereby reducing their vulnerability to abusive relationships. Empowerment interventions encompass various strategies, including education and skill- building, which can contribute to breaking the cycle of violence. Fletcher and Star (2018) examine how feminist organizations affect how public policy reacts to domestic abuse, emphasizing the role of empowerment in advocacy efforts. The review indicates that empowering women through collective action and advocacy can lead to significant policy changes and contribute to a more supportive societal response to domestic violence.

12 The study conducted by Pournaghash-Tehrani (2011) on domestic violence in Iran provides a unique cultural perspective. It explores how employment and economic independence can empower women and potentially challenge traditional gender norms that contribute to domestic violence. This highlights the transformative potential of economic empowerment in diverse cultural contexts. Anderberg et al.'s investigation (2016) on unemployment and domestic violence emphasizes the economic dimension of empowerment. The study reveals a link between unemployment and an increased risk of domestic violence perpetration, emphasizing the importance of economic stability in fostering healthy relationships. Economic empowerment, as suggested by the findings, can contribute to reducing the prevalence of domestic violence. The relationship between employment and empowerment is multifaceted in the context of domestic violence. Economic empowerment through employment can act as a protective factor, but it requires careful consideration of individual circumstances and broader societal factors (Bishop, 2016). Empowerment interventions, both at the individual and collective levels, play a key role in addressing domestic violence by fostering resilience and agency and challenging harmful social norms. This intersection provides a crucial avenue for developing comprehensive strategies that empower individuals and contribute to preventing and reducing domestic violence (Edwards et al., 2017). COVID-19 Pandemic The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified existing challenges within the landscape of domestic violence. The confinement measures implemented during the pandemic have created a fertile ground for the escalation of domestic violence (Leslie & Wilson, 2020). The impact is evident in the increased number of reported cases and the alarming trends observed in the United

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

13 States (Boserup et al., 2020). Sheltering in place has resulted in heightened vulnerability, especially for victims who find themselves isolated from their abusers. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has cast a spotlight on the intersection between public health crises and domestic violence. Various studies, including Kourti et al.'s systematic review (2023), have sought to unravel the complex dynamics and repercussions of domestic violence during the ongoing pandemic. The pandemic's effects extend to perinatal and early childhood development, with research indicating a correlation between physical abuse and adverse outcomes for pregnant women and infants (Saifuddin et al., 2006). The unique stressors introduced by the pandemic have elevated the risk of domestic violence, necessitating a different understanding of the intersection between public health crises and intimate partner violence (Piquero et al., 2021). Piquero et al.'s meta-analysis (2021) provides evidence of a surge in domestic violence cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The systematic review underscores the global impact of lockdowns and social restrictions on the prevalence of domestic violence. It emphasizes the urgency of addressing this "shadow pandemic" alongside the health crisis, recognizing the interconnectedness of public health and interpersonal safety. The study by Gulati and Kelly (2020) explores the role of psychiatry in understanding and addressing domestic violence against women amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach to support survivors and mitigate the mental health impacts of both the pandemic and domestic violence. It sheds light on the compounding effects of these crises on vulnerable populations. Leslie and Wilson's research (2020) adds a different perspective by examining the impact of sheltering in place on domestic violence. Analyzing calls for service during COVID-19, the

14 study highlights the challenges faced by individuals confined to their homes, underscoring the importance of tailored interventions during times of crisis. Khemthong and Chutiphongdech (2021) contribute to the literature by focusing on the impacts of domestic violence on children during the pandemic. The concise review recognizes the ripple effects of domestic violence on the most vulnerable members of society, urging policymakers and practitioners to consider the broader consequences of the "shadow pandemic." Furthermore, Ferrar et al.'s cross-sectional survey (2016) offers insights into the mental health aspects of domestic violence during the pandemic. It underscores the need for mental health support for survivors and emphasizes the intertwined nature of mental health, domestic violence, and the challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. As a response to the evolving landscape of domestic violence during the pandemic, Freeman (2017) presents a comprehensive overview. The book discusses global reactions to domestic violence, highlighting the need for adaptive strategies that account for the unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 context (Walsh et al., 2015). It is a valuable resource for policymakers and practitioners grappling with the dynamic intersection of health crises and interpersonal violence. The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the urgency of addressing domestic violence as an integral part of public health responses. Insights from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and surveys collectively emphasize the need for tailored interventions that recognize the complexities of domestic violence within the context of a global health crisis (Carneiro et al., 2017). As the pandemic continues to unfold, understanding and mitigating the impacts of this "shadow pandemic" remain imperative for safeguarding the well-being of individuals and communities. Conclusion

15 The examination of different studies covered various dimensions including power dynamics, regional variations, intersectionality, employment and empowerment, the impact on children, and the unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a different lens, the synthesis of these themes has unveiled the factors contributing to and perpetuating domestic violence. Power dynamics within domestic settings have emerged as a crucial factor influencing the prevalence and perpetuation of violence. The interplay of power, often manifested through control and dominance, underscores the need for interventions that challenge traditional gender roles and empower victims. The sources collectively emphasize the importance of dismantling power imbalances to effectively address and prevent domestic violence. Regional variations in the manifestation and response to domestic violence have highlighted the contextual nature of this issue. Cultural, social, and economic factors contribute to diverse experiences of violence across different regions. Tailored interventions that consider these variations are essential for crafting effective strategies and support systems. Intersectionality, as highlighted in the literature, accentuates the interconnectedness of various social identities and their impact on one's vulnerability to domestic violence. Recognizing the unique challenges faced by individuals with intersecting identities, such as race, gender, and socioeconomic status, is imperative for providing inclusive and equitable support. Employment and empowerment have emerged as crucial elements in addressing domestic violence. The literature underscores the role of economic independence in empowering victims to break free from abusive relationships. Simultaneously, employment-related stressors and power imbalances within workplaces may contribute to the perpetuation of violence, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches. The COVID-19 pandemic has cast a profound

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

16 shadow on the landscape of domestic violence. The sources illustrate the pandemic's exacerbating effects, with lockdowns and economic strains contributing to increased incidents of violence. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for tailoring responsive strategies that address the unique challenges posed by the pandemic. In conclusion, the analysis of different scholarly perspectives on domestic violence paints a comprehensive picture of its multifaceted nature. It calls for a holistic approach that addresses power dynamics, considers regional variations, recognizes intersectionality, promotes employment and empowerment, and acknowledges the unique challenges posed by the COVID- 19 pandemic. By putting together these insights, a more different understanding of domestic violence emerges which guides the formulation of effective policies, interventions, and support systems aimed at reducing this universal societal issue.

17 References 1. Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of family violence , 25 , 369-382. 2. Anderberg, D., Rainer, H., Wadsworth, J., & Wilson, T. (2016). Unemployment and domestic violence: Theory and evidence. The Economic Journal , 126 (597), 1947-1979. 3. Anderson, K. L. (2017). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. In Domestic Violence (pp. 263-277). Routledge. 4. Anderson, K. L. (2009). A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence. Contemporary Sociology, 532-533. 5. Afrouz, R., Crisp, B. R., & Taket, A. (2020). Seeking help in domestic violence among Muslim women in Muslim-majority and non-Muslim-majority countries: A literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse , 21 (3), 551-566. 6. Ali, P. A., Dhingra, K., & McGarry, J. (2016). A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications. Aggression and violent behavior , 31 , 16-25. 7. Bishop, C. (2016). Domestic violence: The limitations of a legal response. Domestic Violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives on protection, prevention and intervention , 59- 79. 8. Boserup, B., McKenney, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2020). Alarming trends in U.S. domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American journal of emergency medicine , 38 (12), 2753. 9. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (Eds.). (2017). Global responses to domestic violence . Springer International Publishing.

18 10. Buzawa, E. S., Buzawa, C. G., & Stark, E. D. (2015). Responding to domestic violence: The integration of criminal justice and human services . Sage Publications. 11. Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence , 5 (1), 84. 12. Carneiro, J. B., Gomes, N. P., Estrela, F. M., Santana, J. D. D., Mota, R. S., & Erdmann, A. L. (2017). Domestic violence: repercussions for women and children. Escola Anna Nery , 21 , e20160346. 13. Chai, J., Fink, G., Kaaya, S., Danaei, G., & Fawzi, W. (2016). Association between intimate partner violence and poor child growth: results from 42 demographic and health surveys. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 331- 339. 14. Costa, B. M., Kaestle, C. E., Walker, A., Curtis, A., Day, A., Toumbourou, J. W., & Miller, P. (2015). Longitudinal predictors of domestic violence perpetration and victimization: A systematic review. Aggression and violent behavior , 24 , 261-272. 15. Dasre, A., Greulich, A., & Inan, C. (2017). They are combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women's economic empowerment. Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 2017.52 - ISSN: 1955611X. 2017. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01660703/file/17052.pdf (Access Date: 14 March 2018). 16. Edwards, K. M., Neal, A. M., & Rodenhizer-Stämpfli, K. A. (2017). Domestic violence prevention. Preventing crime and violence , 215-227.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

19 17. Erten, B., & Keskin, P. (2018). For better or for worse?: Education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics , 10 (1), 64-105. 18. Fletcher, P., & Star, C. (2018). The influence of feminist organizations on public policy responses to domestic violence and violence against women: A systematic literature review. Social Alternatives , 37 (2), 53-61. 19. Freeman, M. (Ed.). (2017). Domestic violence . Routledge. 20. Goodmark, L. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: A balanced policy approach to intimate partner violence (Vol. 7). Univ of California Press. 21. Gulati, G., & Kelly, B. D. (2020). Domestic violence against women and the COVID-19 pandemic: What is the role of psychiatry? International journal of law and psychiatry , 71 , 101594. 22. Hindin, M. J., & Gultiano, S. (2006). Associations Between Witnessing Parental Domestic Violence and Experiencing Depressive Symptoms in Filipino Adolescents. American Journal of Public Health. 23. Hines, D. (2011). Male Victims of Domestic Abuse May Show Signs of PTSD. Washington: U.S. News & World Report. 24. Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child abuse & neglect , 32 (8), 797-810. 25. Johnson, L., & Stylianou, A. M. (2022). Coordinated community responses to domestic violence: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse , 23 (2), 506- 522.

20 26. Kalokhe, A., Del Rio, C., Dunkle, K., Stephenson, R., Metheny, N., Paranjape, A., & Sahay, S. (2017). Domestic violence against women in India: A systematic review of a decade of quantitative studies. Global public health , 12 (4), 498-513. 27. Khemthong, O., & Chutiphongdech, T. (2021). Domestic violence and its impacts on children: A concise review of past literature. Asia Social Issues , 14 (6), 249759-12. 28. Kiani, Z., Simbar, M., Fakari, F. R., Kazemi, S., Ghasemi, V., Azimi, N., ... & Bazzazian, S. (2021). A systematic review: Empowerment interventions to reduce domestic violence? Aggression and violent behavior , 58 , 101585. 29. Kizilgol, O. A., & Ipek, E. (2018). An Analysis on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey: Multinomial Logit Model. Business and Economics Research Journal, 715- 734. 30. Kofman, Y. B., & Garfin, D. R. (2020). Home is not always a haven: The domestic violence crisis amid the COVID-19 pandemic —Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy , 12 (S1), S199. 31. Kolbe, V., & Büttner, A. (2020). Domestic violence against men—prevalence and risk factors. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International , 117 (31-32), 534. 32. Kourti, A., Stavridou, A., Panagouli, E., Psaltopoulou, T., Spiliopoulou, C., Tsolia, M., ... & Tsitsika, A. (2023). Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Trauma, violence, & abuse , 24 (2), 719-745. 33. Leslie, E., & Wilson, R. (2020). Sheltering in place and domestic violence: Evidence from calls for service during COVID-19 —Journal of Public Economics , 189 , 104241. 34. Lloyd, M. (2018). Domestic violence and education: Examining the impact of domestic violence on young children, children, and young people and the potential role of schools. Frontiers in Psychology , 9 , 2094.

21 35. Marsden, J. (2014). Domestic Violence Asylum After Matter of L-R. The Yale Law Journal. 36. Murty, S. A., Peek-Asa, C., Zwerling, C., & Stromquist, A. M. (2003). Physical and emotional partner abuse reported by men and women in a rural community. American Journal of Public Health. 37. Mshweshwe, L. (2020). Understanding domestic violence: masculinity, culture, traditions. Heliyon , 6 (10). 38. Myhill, A. (2017). Measuring domestic violence: Context is everything. Journal of gender-based violence , 1 (1), 33-44. 39. Owusu Adjah, E. S., & Agbemafle, I. (2016). Determinants of domestic violence against women in Ghana. BMC Public Health , 16 (1), 1-9. 40. Pentaraki, M., & Speake, J. (2020). Domestic violence in a COVID-19 context: Exploring emerging issues through a systematic literature analysis. Open journal of social sciences , 8 (10), 193. 41. Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., Jemison, E., Kaukinen, C., & Knaul, F. M. (2021). Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic- Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice , 74 , 101806. 42. Pournaghash-Tehrani, S. (2011). Domestic violence in Iran: A literature review. Aggression and violent behavior , 16 (1), 1-5. 43. Rodrigues, N. C. P., O’Dwyer, G., Andrade, M. K. D. N., Flynn, M. B., Monteiro, D. L. M., & Lino, V. T. S. (2017). The increase in domestic violence in Brazil from 2009- 2014. Ciencia & saude coletiva , 22 , 2873-2880.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

22 44. Rollè, L., Ramon, S., & Brustia, P. (2019). New perspectives on domestic violence: From research to intervention. Frontiers in Psychology , 10 , 641. 45. Semahegn, A., & Mengistie, B. (2015). Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; a systematic review. Reproductive health , 12 (1), 1-12. 46. Shah, S., Rajani, K., Kataria, L., Trivedi, A., & Patel, S. (2012). Perception and prevalence of domestic violence in the study population. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 137-143. 47. Showalter, K. (2016). Women's employment and domestic violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and violent behavior , 31 , 37-47. 48. Smith, A. K. (2015). How Money Is Used as a Weapon in Relationships. Kiplinger's Personal Finance. 49. Tittlová, M., & Papacek, P. (2018). Factors contributing to domestic violence. 50. Walker-Descartes, I., Mineo, M., Condado, L. V., & Agrawal, N. (2021). Domestic violence and its effects on women, children, and families. Pediatric Clinics , 68 (2), 455- 464. 51. Walsh, J., Spangaro, J., & Soldatic, K. (2015). Global understandings of domestic violence. Nursing and Health Sciences , 1-4. 52. Wire, B. (2006). Some of the Biggest Victims of Domestic Violence Are the Smallest; New Global Report. New York. 53. Voce, I., & Boxall, H. (2018). Who reports domestic violence to the police? A review of the evidence. Trends and crime and criminal justice issues, (559), 1-16.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

LR

Related Documents