PHI 220 week 3 discussion

docx

School

Strayer University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

220

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by AgentSquirrel3711

You are correct that making a moral argument requires providing reasons for your position. In the case of Cheryl Hopwood, it is essential to consider the ethical implications of preferential treatment in university admissions. The University of Texas Law School's affirmative action policy was designed to increase diversity in the student body by giving preference to minority students. However, this policy resulted in Cheryl Hopwood, a white student from a low-income family, being denied admission despite having better grades and LSAT scores than many of the minority students who were admitted. One possible moral argument against preferential treatment is that it violates the principle of meritocracy, which holds that individuals should be rewarded based on their abilities and achievements rather than their race or ethnicity. According to this view, the University of Texas Law School should have acknowledged Cheryl Hopwood because she had better grades and LSAT scores than many of the minority students who were admitted. Another possible moral argument against preferential treatment is that it perpetuates racial stereotypes and discrimination. According to this view, affirmative action policies assume that portions of selected racial or cultural groups are inherently disadvantaged and require special treatment to succeed. This assumption can lead to negative stereotypes and discrimination against these groups. On the other hand, one possible moral argument favoring preferential treatment is that it promotes diversity and social justice. According to this view, affirmative action policies are necessary to address historical injustices and promote equal occasions for everyone regardless of race or ethnicity. By giving preference to minority students, universities can

initiate a more varied scholar body that reflects the broader society and provides opportunities for underrepresented groups. In conclusion, the question of whether it is fair for minorities from middle-class families to be given preferential treatment over whites from economically disadvantaged families is a complex issue with competing moral arguments. It is essential to consider all sides of the debate and weigh the ethical implications of each position before concluding. https://learn.saylor.org/mod/page/view.php?id=30664. https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/affirmative-reaction/. https://www.bartleby.com/questions-and-answers/making-a-moral-argument- entails-providing-reasons-for-the-position-you-take.-the-reasons-must-includ/af660b65-48f4- 4463-922c-01b3e6191277. https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/law-cheryl-hopwood/. Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopwood_v._Texas. Thanks for posting early in week three and answering the questions posted about the case study. I like the way you gave us different arguments and showed us your reasoning behind how prospective students should be treated in terms of college admission and financial aid. Nice reasoning here about the important issues, and good work showing us how everyone should be given a chance to succeed. Watch the short video overview posted in week three about the Case Study due this week and send me a draft of your work, before submitting if you would like some writing tips. Recent Supreme Court rulings have cut back

or eliminated some policies colleges used to follow to create diversity in their admissions process. What do you think about those rulings? Should all students have an equal chance to be admitted to a school of their choice, based on their academic performance in high school or on a test administered by College Board, like the SAT or LSAT? The Supreme Court recently ruled that reduced or eliminated some policies universities adopted to create diversity in their admissions processes. The ruling is controversial because many universities and presidents oppose race-based admissions decisions, arguing that it reduces diversity in higher education. However, the Supreme Court's decision has also been applauded by some who believe race should not be a factor in college admissions. The Supreme Court's judgment on assenting action in college admissions is a complex issue debated for years. Supporters of confirmatory action argue that it is essential to ensure diversity in higher education and provide opportunities for underrepresented groups. Opponents of affirmative action argue that using race as a factor in college admissions is unfair and discriminatory. It is important to note that the Supreme Court's decision does not mean universities cannot consider race in their admissions process. Instead, it means that universities must do so in a way that is entirely proportionate to achieving diversity goals without using quotas or other rigid formulas. Finally, the impact of the Supreme Court's decision on college admissions remains to be seen. This issue will probably continue to be a topic of discussion for years to come.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

The question of whether all students should have an equal chance of getting into the school of their choice based on their academic performance is complicated. While some believe that academic performance should be the main criterion for university admission, others believe this is an unfair and incorrect criterion for measuring intelligence and learning ability. The National Association of College Admissions Counseling, the most significant admissions factors are overall high school GPA, performance in college preparatory classes or other college preparatory classes, and the difficulty of students' curriculum. Profession officers also deem other factors as supplementary activities and personal characteristics. Consequently, academic performance is essential to college admissions, but not everything. Universities consider various factors when making admissions decisions. The final target is to create a distinct student body that actively contributes to the university community.