Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, company H is one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in company H board of directors. The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, CEO of company H, started secret surveillance on board of member and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and termination of person D. The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong but Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at company H sponsored events which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA as CEO who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue. The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP and more problem aroused when an outside firm proposed Person AP as CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of company H board. Person MW, led the company as CEO and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017. To identify: Whether its CEO, the board of directors or both has to be blamed for company H’s shareholder value destruction and determine whether any recourse do the shareholders have.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter MC, Problem 21.1DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, company H is one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in company H board of directors.

The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, CEO of company H, started secret surveillance on board of member and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and termination of person D.

The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong but Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at company H sponsored events which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA as CEO who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue.

The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP and more problem aroused when an outside firm proposed Person AP as CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of company H board. Person MW, led the company as CEO and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017.

To identify: Whether its CEO, the board of directors or both has to be blamed for company H’s shareholder value destruction and determine whether any recourse do the shareholders have.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Kim and Park (2011) argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities not only have value for benefitting social causes but can also be regarded as recruiting tools for attracting potential employees who perceive the organization and its CSR activities as an ethical fit. The foundation of this argument comes from an organizational perspective that views employees as important assets for a corporation. Coming from this perspective would mean that corporations would be cognizant about the imperative to have an active CSR program that matches corporate values, missions, and cultures. Walmart Inc is the company of choice. What are Walmart Inc CSR activities? What do these activities communicate about Walmart Inc? Assess whether these activities are cause beneficial or cause exploitative? Give evidence for the answer. Would it be considered working for Walmart Inc?

The following cost data relate to the office overhead costs of Hamilton Accounting Services during the just-completed year: • Office rent: $32,400 Office supplies: $6,980 Utilities, office: $18,250 • Salary, office manager: $62,180 • Salary, receptionist: $40,560 • • Depreciation-office equipment: $13,750 Software licensing fees: $27,320 Other miscellaneous expenses: $35,600 Total overhead costs: $237,040 The company applies overhead costs using a predetermined overhead rate of $7 per accountant hour. A total of 36,200 accountant hours was recorded for the year. Compute the amount of under- or overapplied overhead cost for the year.

Describe the need for financial reports for the following stakeholders.a. The Community (3 marks)b. Creditors (4 marks)