Issue 1- Enivronmental Concerns Environmental sustainability poses a significant challenge in terms of material sourcing, carbon neutrality, and waste management. Apple depends on mining for essential materials like cobalt and lithium, which leads to pollution, deforestation, and greenhouse gas emissions. Although Apple has committed to becoming carbon-neutral by 2030, the mining and production of its products still contribute to environmental harm. Mining processes continue environmental degradation; extraction process use extensive water resources, resulting in shortages and harm to surrounding ecosystems (Vikström et al., 2021). As the demand for Apple devices continues to grow, increasing the need for these raw materials and putting more strain on natural resources. Despite Apple's advancements toward carbon neutrality and product recycling initiatives, the pervasive problem of e-waste and resource-heavy production methods continues to evoke ethical concerns (Geisdoerfer et al., 2020). Apple's known business model that intentionally shortens product lifecycle to maintain To reduce its environmental footprint, Apple must improve its sourcing strategies, invest in alternative materials, and ensure responsible recycling practices (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Issue 2 - Human Rights Concerns Apple is dedicated to sourcing materials responsibly and sustainably; however, the global supply chain poses significant challenges. One prominent ethical concern involves labor conditions in Apple's supply chain, especially in factories run by third-party manufacturers. Reports of long working hours, insufficient wages, and poor conditions have prompted worries about Apple's responsibility in promoting fair labor practices (Chan et al., 2020). Although Apple has made efforts to uphold labor standards, difficulties persist. A primary ethical concern is the use of child labor and unsafe working conditions in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where more than 70% of the world's cobalt supply is produced (Amnesty International, 2021). Reports reveal that thousands of children and vulnerable workers participate in artisanal mining, often exposed to toxic dust and hazardous environments. According to the Business and Human Rights Resource Center, technology companies are complicit in human rights abuses of child cobalt miners (Ochab, 2020). For instance, it was reported that in late 2019, firms like Apple, Dell, Tesla, and Microsoft were embroiled in a lawsuit, accusing them of actively being involved in the deaths and injuries of children mining for cobalt in the DRC. Technology companies are knowingly benefiting from such practices to the extent of availing substantial support to the artisanal mining system. Under International Human Rights law, technological companies have avoided scrutiny that regulates individuals and state administrations. This leeway has enabled them to embark on practices that fuel conflict and violence in mineral-rich regions to benefit from the raw materials. Although exploitation and forced labor are rampant at the lower supply chain levels, issues of human rights violations at the subsequent levels are constantly being reported. In a case against Apple in 2021, US Senator Jeff Merkley and Representative James P. McGover demonstrated that despite Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, assuring that the company's supply chain is free of forced labor, there was evidence pointing towards the fact that it used the approach against the Uighur people of China (Congressional Executive Commission on China, 2021). Lens Technology, the company responsible for fixing the lenses in Apple phones, was accused of using coercive 'labor transfer' programs involving ethnic minority workers. These programs were blatant because they were supported by the Chinese government, which had placed the minority group in concentration camps and coerced them into forced labor. In another incident, Indian workers gathered outside Apple supplier Wistron to protest the unfortunate working conditions (Albergotti, 2020). The rapid growth of these mining activities has displaced local communities and created long-term socio-economic issues. Apple's products are manufactured in various countries, particularly in China, where factories have faced accusations of poor working conditions, low wages, and excessive working hours (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Suppliers such as Foxconn have been linked to labor violations, including employee mistreatment and unsafe working environments. Furthermore, reports indicate that some Apple suppliers may be connected to forced labor practices, particularly in regions like Xinjiang. Apple sources minerals from countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where child labor and forced labor are serious problems. Reports indicate that some mining operations involve children as young as six working in dangerous conditions (citation). Additionally, some of these minerals, known as conflict minerals, help finance violent groups that exploit workers and communities. Although Apple has supplier guidelines to prevent these violations, enforcing them across a complex global supply chain remains a challenge. Many mining regions remain poor and underdeveloped despite their valuable resources. To address this, Apple must take stronger action to ensure that minerals used in its products come from ethical sources and that workers are treated fairly. Issue 3 - Privacy Concerns Another significant issue centers around user privacy and data security. Apple has branded itself as a privacy-centric entity, but government agencies worldwide persist in seeking user data access, creating tension between privacy advocacy and legal requirements (Mozur & Wakabayashi, 2021). The company uses encryption and strict privacy policies, but its reliance on cloud storage and its cooperation with legal authorities raise questions about data security (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). In some countries, Apple has been criticized for complying with government demands to remove apps or limit access to certain information, which raises concerns about digital freedom. Additionally, with the rise of artificial intelligence and tracking technologies, users worry about how their data is used. While Apple has taken steps to protect privacy, it must continue strengthening its policies to ensure user information remains secure and private.
Issue 1- Enivronmental Concerns Environmental sustainability poses a significant challenge in terms of material sourcing, carbon neutrality, and waste management. Apple depends on mining for essential materials like cobalt and lithium, which leads to pollution, deforestation, and greenhouse gas emissions. Although Apple has committed to becoming carbon-neutral by 2030, the mining and production of its products still contribute to environmental harm. Mining processes continue environmental degradation; extraction process use extensive water resources, resulting in shortages and harm to surrounding ecosystems (Vikström et al., 2021). As the demand for Apple devices continues to grow, increasing the need for these raw materials and putting more strain on natural resources. Despite Apple's advancements toward carbon neutrality and product recycling initiatives, the pervasive problem of e-waste and resource-heavy production methods continues to evoke ethical concerns (Geisdoerfer et al., 2020). Apple's known business model that intentionally shortens product lifecycle to maintain To reduce its environmental footprint, Apple must improve its sourcing strategies, invest in alternative materials, and ensure responsible recycling practices (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Issue 2 - Human Rights Concerns Apple is dedicated to sourcing materials responsibly and sustainably; however, the global supply chain poses significant challenges. One prominent ethical concern involves labor conditions in Apple's supply chain, especially in factories run by third-party manufacturers. Reports of long working hours, insufficient wages, and poor conditions have prompted worries about Apple's responsibility in promoting fair labor practices (Chan et al., 2020). Although Apple has made efforts to uphold labor standards, difficulties persist. A primary ethical concern is the use of child labor and unsafe working conditions in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where more than 70% of the world's cobalt supply is produced (Amnesty International, 2021). Reports reveal that thousands of children and vulnerable workers participate in artisanal mining, often exposed to toxic dust and hazardous environments. According to the Business and Human Rights Resource Center, technology companies are complicit in human rights abuses of child cobalt miners (Ochab, 2020). For instance, it was reported that in late 2019, firms like Apple, Dell, Tesla, and Microsoft were embroiled in a lawsuit, accusing them of actively being involved in the deaths and injuries of children mining for cobalt in the DRC. Technology companies are knowingly benefiting from such practices to the extent of availing substantial support to the artisanal mining system. Under International Human Rights law, technological companies have avoided scrutiny that regulates individuals and state administrations. This leeway has enabled them to embark on practices that fuel conflict and violence in mineral-rich regions to benefit from the raw materials. Although exploitation and forced labor are rampant at the lower supply chain levels, issues of human rights violations at the subsequent levels are constantly being reported. In a case against Apple in 2021, US Senator Jeff Merkley and Representative James P. McGover demonstrated that despite Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, assuring that the company's supply chain is free of forced labor, there was evidence pointing towards the fact that it used the approach against the Uighur people of China (Congressional Executive Commission on China, 2021). Lens Technology, the company responsible for fixing the lenses in Apple phones, was accused of using coercive 'labor transfer' programs involving ethnic minority workers. These programs were blatant because they were supported by the Chinese government, which had placed the minority group in concentration camps and coerced them into forced labor. In another incident, Indian workers gathered outside Apple supplier Wistron to protest the unfortunate working conditions (Albergotti, 2020). The rapid growth of these mining activities has displaced local communities and created long-term socio-economic issues. Apple's products are manufactured in various countries, particularly in China, where factories have faced accusations of poor working conditions, low wages, and excessive working hours (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Suppliers such as Foxconn have been linked to labor violations, including employee mistreatment and unsafe working environments. Furthermore, reports indicate that some Apple suppliers may be connected to forced labor practices, particularly in regions like Xinjiang. Apple sources minerals from countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where child labor and forced labor are serious problems. Reports indicate that some mining operations involve children as young as six working in dangerous conditions (citation). Additionally, some of these minerals, known as conflict minerals, help finance violent groups that exploit workers and communities. Although Apple has supplier guidelines to prevent these violations, enforcing them across a complex global supply chain remains a challenge. Many mining regions remain poor and underdeveloped despite their valuable resources. To address this, Apple must take stronger action to ensure that minerals used in its products come from ethical sources and that workers are treated fairly. Issue 3 - Privacy Concerns Another significant issue centers around user privacy and data security. Apple has branded itself as a privacy-centric entity, but government agencies worldwide persist in seeking user data access, creating tension between privacy advocacy and legal requirements (Mozur & Wakabayashi, 2021). The company uses encryption and strict privacy policies, but its reliance on cloud storage and its cooperation with legal authorities raise questions about data security (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). In some countries, Apple has been criticized for complying with government demands to remove apps or limit access to certain information, which raises concerns about digital freedom. Additionally, with the rise of artificial intelligence and tracking technologies, users worry about how their data is used. While Apple has taken steps to protect privacy, it must continue strengthening its policies to ensure user information remains secure and private.
Chapter17: Advertising And Public Relations
Section17.2: Greenwashing Harms Companies And Consumers
Problem 1C
Related questions
Question
Issue 4 – Supply Chain Management Issues
The COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions have also exposed weaknesses in Apple’s
supply chain, leading to production delays and disruptions. While Apple has implemented
programs to monitor and improve supplier conditions, issues persist. The company must take
stronger action to ensure ethical labor practices, diversify its supply chain, and reduce
dependence on high-risk regions.
Apple has made efforts to address environmental, human rights, privacy, and supply chain
concerns, but challenges remain. The company must improve ethical sourcing, enforce stricter
labor standards, be more transparent about data policies, and invest in sustainable alternatives
(Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Addressing these issues will help Apple maintain its reputation
while ensuring long-term sustainability and corporate responsibility.
Make a short term and long term plan for apple

Transcribed Image Text:Issue 1- Enivronmental Concerns
Environmental sustainability poses a significant challenge in terms of material sourcing,
carbon neutrality, and waste management. Apple depends on mining for essential materials like
cobalt and lithium, which leads to pollution, deforestation, and greenhouse gas emissions.
Although Apple has committed to becoming carbon-neutral by 2030, the mining and production
of its products still contribute to environmental harm. Mining processes continue environmental
degradation; extraction process use extensive water resources, resulting in shortages and harm to
surrounding ecosystems (Vikström et al., 2021). As the demand for Apple devices continues to
grow, increasing the need for these raw materials and putting more strain on natural resources.
Despite Apple's advancements toward carbon neutrality and product recycling initiatives,
the pervasive problem of e-waste and resource-heavy production methods continues to evoke
ethical concerns (Geisdoerfer et al., 2020). Apple's known business model that intentionally
shortens product lifecycle to maintain To reduce its environmental footprint, Apple must
improve its sourcing strategies, invest in alternative materials, and ensure responsible recycling
practices (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015).
Issue 2 - Human Rights Concerns
Apple is dedicated to sourcing materials responsibly and sustainably; however, the global
supply chain poses significant challenges. One prominent ethical concern involves labor
conditions in Apple's supply chain, especially in factories run by third-party manufacturers.
Reports of long working hours, insufficient wages, and poor conditions have prompted worries
about Apple's responsibility in promoting fair labor practices (Chan et al., 2020). Although
Apple has made efforts to uphold labor standards, difficulties persist. A primary ethical concern
is the use of child labor and unsafe working conditions in cobalt mining in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo (DRC), where more than 70% of the world's cobalt supply is produced
(Amnesty International, 2021). Reports reveal that thousands of children and vulnerable workers
participate in artisanal mining, often exposed to toxic dust and hazardous environments.
According to the Business and Human Rights Resource Center, technology companies are
complicit in human rights abuses of child cobalt miners (Ochab, 2020). For instance, it was
reported that in late 2019, firms like Apple, Dell, Tesla, and Microsoft were embroiled in a
lawsuit, accusing them of actively being involved in the deaths and injuries of children mining
for cobalt in the DRC.
Technology companies are knowingly benefiting from such practices to the extent of availing
substantial support to the artisanal mining system. Under International Human Rights law,
technological companies have avoided scrutiny that regulates individuals and state

Transcribed Image Text:administrations. This leeway has enabled them to embark on practices that fuel conflict and
violence in mineral-rich regions to benefit from the raw materials.
Although exploitation and forced labor are rampant at the lower supply chain levels,
issues of human rights violations at the subsequent levels are constantly being reported. In a case
against Apple in 2021, US Senator Jeff Merkley and Representative James P. McGover
demonstrated that despite Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, assuring that the company's supply chain is
free of forced labor, there was evidence pointing towards the fact that it used the approach
against the Uighur people of China (Congressional Executive Commission on China, 2021).
Lens Technology, the company responsible for fixing the lenses in Apple phones, was accused of
using coercive 'labor transfer' programs involving ethnic minority workers. These programs
were blatant because they were supported by the Chinese government, which had placed the
minority group in concentration camps and coerced them into forced labor. In another incident,
Indian workers gathered outside Apple supplier Wistron to protest the unfortunate working
conditions (Albergotti, 2020). The rapid growth of these mining activities has displaced local
communities and created long-term socio-economic issues.
Apple's products are manufactured in various countries, particularly in China, where
factories have faced accusations of poor working conditions, low wages, and excessive working
hours (Khan, Alam, & Alam, 2015). Suppliers such as Foxconn have been linked to labor
violations, including employee mistreatment and unsafe working environments. Furthermore,
reports indicate that some Apple suppliers may be connected to forced labor practices,
particularly in regions like Xinjiang.
Apple sources minerals from countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where child labor
and forced labor are serious problems. Reports indicate that some mining operations involve
children as young as six working in dangerous conditions (citation). Additionally, some of these
minerals, known as conflict minerals, help finance violent groups that exploit workers and
communities. Although Apple has supplier guidelines to prevent these violations, enforcing them
across a complex global supply chain remains a challenge. Many mining regions remain poor
and underdeveloped despite their valuable resources. To address this, Apple must take stronger
action to ensure that minerals used in its products come from ethical sources and that workers are
treated fairly.
Issue 3 - Privacy Concerns
Another significant issue centers around user privacy and data security. Apple has
branded itself as a privacy-centric entity, but government agencies worldwide persist in seeking
user data access, creating tension between privacy advocacy and legal requirements (Mozur &
Wakabayashi, 2021). The company uses encryption and strict privacy policies, but its reliance on
cloud storage and its cooperation with legal authorities raise questions about data security (Khan,
Alam, & Alam, 2015). In some countries, Apple has been criticized for complying with
government demands to remove apps or limit access to certain information, which raises
concerns about digital freedom. Additionally, with the rise of artificial intelligence and tracking
technologies, users worry about how their data is used. While Apple has taken steps to protect
privacy, it must continue strengthening its policies to ensure user information remains secure and
private.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps

Recommended textbooks for you

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780357033791
Author:
Pride, William M
Publisher:
South Western Educational Publishing

Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Management
ISBN:
9781305502215
Author:
Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:
Cengage Learning