Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors. The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D. The company then selected Person H as the new CEO, under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue. The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017. To discuss: The general lessons in terms of corporate governance and business ethics that could be drawn from company H.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter MC, Problem 20.4DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors.

The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D.

The company then selected Person H as the new CEO, under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue.

The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017.

To discuss: The general lessons in terms of corporate governance and business ethics that could be drawn from company H.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Hi, Amazon works with four different vendors to package and send magazines to customers. We want to identify the top three vendors. Remember Amazon’s goals: Maintain high customer satisfaction, Ship products on time, Minimize costs. Each vendor is rated on several performance metrics. Can you identify the vendors that best meet Amazon’s goals? Thank you, Nadia Loomis

What defines the bargaining zone in a negotiation?- The bargaining zone, or the zone of possible agreement (ZOPA), is the scale of acceptable outcomes in a negotiation. At one end is the lowest price/ set of terms one party is ready to accept, and the other end of the scale is the highest price/ desired terms of the negotiation. Typically, each party starts on either side of the scale at the beginning of a negotiation. Successful negotiations meet in the middle of this range of acceptable outcomes, resulting in a mutually beneficial agreement (Thompson, 2020). How does a positive or negative bargaining zone affect the outcome of a negotiation and one's BATNA? - The bargaining zone (ZOPA) directly impacts the strength of one's BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement). A strong BATNA provides leverage to negotiate better terms in a positive bargaining zone, where the buyer's maximum exceeds the seller's minimum (Thompson, 2020). The negotiator can push closer to their…

How does a positive or negative bargaining zone affect the outcome of a negotiation and one's BATNA? Provide a real life example.