Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors. The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D. The company then selected Person H as the new CEO, under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue. The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017. To determine: Why Company H decided to split into two firms, if the move creates shareholder value, and which company has better performance.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter MC, Problem 20.3DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors.

The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D.

The company then selected Person H as the new CEO, under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue.

The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017.

To determine: Why Company H decided to split into two firms, if the move creates shareholder value, and which company has better performance.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

In 2022, GlobalTech, a multinational company, expanded its operations into a developing country with different cultural norms around labor practices. While GlobalTech's corporate ethics emphasised fair wages, safe working conditions, and environmental sustainability, local business practices often included lower wages, minimal safety protocols, and lax environmental regulations. The CEO, Jane Harris, who strongly believed in ethical universalism, faced pressure from the local management team to adapt to the region’s practices to reduce operational costs and gain competitive advantage. As the company compromised on wages and environmental standards, it sparked internal conflicts among employees, with some advocating for adherence to the company's global ethical policies while others argued for alignment with local practices under the guise of ethical relativism. Soon after, news broke out about poor working conditions and environmental violations, leading to public outrage, protests,…

-Provides a clear definition of personal and corporate ethical values and their relevance to business decision-making.- Discusses how Jane Harris's belief in ethical universalism influences her decision- making. Examples from the scenario are well integrated. - Explains the role of corporate ethics at GlobalTech, particularly around sustainability, fair wages, and safe workingconditions. Discusses how these values shape business policies and practices. - Summarises the influence of personal and corporate values on decision-making and how ethical conflicts may affect a multinational business like GlobalTech. - The discussion is logically structured, with clear argumentation and a coherent flow of ideas.

In 2022, GlobalTech, a multinational company, expanded its operations into a developing country with different cultural norms around labor practices. While GlobalTech's corporate ethics emphasised fair wages, safe working conditions, and environmental sustainability, local business practices often included lower wages, minimal safety protocols, and lax environmental regulations. The CEO, Jane Harris, who strongly believed in ethical universalism, faced pressure from the local management team to adapt to the region’s practices to reduce operational costs and gain competitive advantage. As the company compromised on wages and environmental standards, it sparked internal conflicts among employees, with some advocating for adherence to the company's global ethical policies while others argued for alignment with local practices under the guise of ethical relativism. Soon after, news broke out about poor working conditions and environmental violations, leading to public outrage, protests,…