(a)
Interpretation:Change in concentration of each gas A, B, C, and D on addition of more reactant A should be predicted and justified.
Concept introduction:Le Chatelier’s established the qualitative effects of change in concentration or partial pressure of reactant on reaction equilibrium.
It suggests that if a certain change in concentration of substrates occurs then reaction proceeds so as to minimize the effects of changes. This way the direction of equilibrium can be altered by various changes and yield of the desired product can be enhanced. For example, Le Chatelier’s has improved the synthesis of ammonia by Haber’s process.
The yield of ammonia is increased when ammonia already formed is removed from the reactor that allows for more combination of nitrogen and hydrogen to form more ammonia.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
The equilibrium is indicated as follows:
If the reactants A is added more to the flask the equilibrium will be favored in forward direct towards right in accordance with Le Chatelier’s principle.
When reaction is favored in forward direction then concentration of B shall reduce while concentration of C and D will increases.
(b)
Interpretation: Change in concentration of each gas A, B, C, and D on addition of more reactant D should be predicted and justified.
Concept introduction:Le Chatelier’s established the qualitative effects of change in concentration or partial pressure of reactant on reaction equilibrium.
It suggests that if a certain change in concentration of substrates occurs then reaction proceeds so as to minimize the effects of changes. This way the direction of equilibrium can be altered by various changes and yield of the desired product can be enhanced. For example, the Le Chatelier’s has improved the synthesis of ammonia by Haber’s process.
The yield of ammonia is increased when ammonia already formed is removed from the reactor that allows for more combination of nitrogen and hydrogen to form more ammonia.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
The equilibrium is indicated as follows:
If the reactants D is added more to the flask the equilibrium will be favored in backward direct towards left in accordance with Le Chatelier’s principle.
When reaction is favored in reverse direction then concentration of C shall reduce while concentration of A and B will increases.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Chemical Principles
- Consider an equilibrium mixture of four chemicals (A. B. C. and D. all gases) reacting in a closed flask according to the following equation: A+BC+Da. You add more A to the flask. How does the concentration of each chemical compare to its original concentration after equilibrium is re-established? Justify your answer. h. You have the original set-up at equilibrium, and add more D to the flask. How does the concentration of each chemical compare to its original concentration after equilibrium is re-established? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardConsider the following equilibrium: COBr2(g) CO(g) + Br2(g)Kc = 0.190 at 73 C (a) A 0.50 mol sample of COBr2 is transferred to a 9.50-L flask and heated until equilibrium is attained. Calculate the equilibrium concentrations of each species. (b) The volume of the container is decreased to 4.5 L and the system allowed to return to equilibrium. Calculate the new equilibrium concentrations. (Hint: The calculation will be easier if you view this as a new problem with 0.5 mol of COBr2 transferred to a 4.5-L flask.) (c) What is the effect of decreasing the container volume from 9.50 L to 4.50 L?arrow_forwardConsider an equilibrium mixture of four chemicals (A, B, C, and D, all gases) reacting in a closed flask according to the equation: A(g)+B(g)C(g)+D(g) a. You add more A to the flask. How does the concentration of each chemical compare to its original concentration after equilibrium is reestablished? Justify your answer. b. You have the original setup at equilibrium, and you add more D to the flask. How does the concentration of each chemical compare to its original concentration after equilibrium is reestablished? Justify your answer.arrow_forward
- Consider the following reactions at some temperature: 2NOCl(g)2NO(g)+Cl2(g)K=1.6105 2NO(g)N2(g)+O2(g)K=11031 For each reaction, assume some quantities of the reactants were placed in separate containers and allowed to come to equilibrium. Describe the relative amounts of reactants and products that would be present at equilibrium. At equilibrium, which is faster, the forward or reverse reaction in each case?arrow_forward. Consider an equilibrium mixture consisting of H2O(g), CO(g). H2(g), and CO2(g) reacting in a closed vessel according to the equation H2O(g)+CO(g)H2(g)+CO2(g)a. You add more H2O to the flask. How does the new equilibrium concentration of each chemical compare to its origin al equilibrium concentration after equilibrium is re-established? Justify your answer. b. You add more H2to the flask. How does the concentration of each chemical compare to its original concentration after equilibrium is re-established? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardConsider 0.200 mol phosphorus pentachloride sealed in a 2.0-L container at 620 K. The equilibrium constant, Kc, is 0.60 for PCl5(g) PCl3(g) + Cl2(g) Calculate the concentrations of all species after equilibrium has been reached.arrow_forward
- Consider the following reaction at 1000 C: NO(g)+12 Cl2(g)NOCl(g) (a) Write an equilibrium constant expression for the reaction and call it K'. (b) Write an equilibrium constant expression for the decomposition of NOCl to produce one mole of chlorine gas. Call the constant K. (c) Relate K' and K.arrow_forwardTwo molecules of A react to form one molecule of B, as in the reaction 2 A(g) B(g) Three experiments are done at different temperatures and equilibrium concentrations are measured. For each experiment, calculate the equilibrium constant, Kc. (a) [A] = 0.74 mol/L, [B] = 0.74 mol/L (b) [A] = 2.0 mol/L, [B] = 2.0 mol/L (c) [A] = 0.01 mol/L, [B] = 0.01 mol/L What can you conclude about this statement: If the concentrations of reactants and products are equal, then the equilibrium constant is always 1.0.arrow_forwardA mixture of N2, H2, and NH3 is at equilibrium [according to the equationN2(g)+3H2(g)2NH3(g)] as depicted below: The volume is suddenly decreased (by increasing the external pressure) and a new equilibrium is established as depicted below: a. If the volume of the final equilibrium mixture is 1.00 L, determine the value of the equilibrium constant, K. for the reaction. Assume temperature is constant. b. Determine the volume of the initial equilibrium mixture assuming a final equilibrium volume of 1.00 L and assuming a constant temperature.arrow_forward
- In Section 13.1 of your text, it is mentioned that equilibrium is reached in a closed system. What is meant by the term closed system. and why is it necessary to have a closed system in order for a system to reach equilibrium? Explain why equilibrium is not reached in an open system.arrow_forwardWhat is Le Chteliers principle? Consider the reaction 2NOCI(g)2NO(g)+Cl2(g) If this reaction is at equilibrium. what happens when the following changes occur? a. NOCI(g) is added. b. NO(g) is added. c. NOCI(g) is removed. d. Cl2(g) is removed. e. The container volume is decreased. For each of these changes, what happens to the value of K for the reaction as equilibrium is reached again? Give an example of a reaction for which the addition or removal of one of the reactants or products has no effect on the equilibrium position. In general, how will the equilibrium position of a gas-phase reaction be affected if the volume of the reaction vessel changes? Are there reactions that will not have their equilibria shifted by a change in volume? Explain. Why does changing the pressure in a rigid container by adding an inert gas not shift the equilibrium position for a gas-phase reaction?arrow_forwardSummarize the steps for solving equilibrium problems (see the beginning of Section 12-6). In general, when solving an equilibrium problem, You should always set up an ICE table. What is an ICE table?arrow_forward
- Introductory Chemistry: A FoundationChemistryISBN:9781337399425Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: An Atoms First ApproachChemistryISBN:9781305079243Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. ZumdahlPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry for Engineering StudentsChemistryISBN:9781337398909Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom HolmePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage Learning