Experimental Organic Chemistry: A Miniscale & Microscale Approach (Cengage Learning Laboratory Series for Organic Chemistry)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781305080461
Author: John C. Gilbert, Stephen F. Martin
Publisher: Brooks Cole
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Question
Chapter 5.3, Problem 16E
Interpretation Introduction
Interpretation:
The result of keeping naphthalene under vacuum for some time for drying needs to be explained.
Concept introduction:
Sublimation is a process in which solid material is directly converted to gas without converting to liquid.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
LABORATORY REPORT FORM
Part I. Determination of the Formula of a Known Hydrate
1. Mass of empty evaporating dish
3. Mass of hydrate
Using subtraction
or mass by difference,
find the mass of
the hydrate
76.96
-75.40
75.40g
76.968
1.568
01.56
76.90 g
2. Mass of evaporating dish + hydrate
4. Mass of evaporating dish + hydrate (after heating)
First 76.98 g
Third 76.66g
Second
Fourth (if necessary) 76.60g
5. Mass of anhydrate
6. Mass of water lost by the hydrate
7. Percent of water of hydration
(Show Calculations)
8. Moles of water
(Show Calculations)
mol
mass of water
=
MM of water (g/m)
9. Moles of anhydrate
(Show Calculations)
10. Ratio of moles of water to moles of anhydrate
11 F(Show Calculations)
11. Formula of hydrate
- Mass of water (g) x 100
% water hydration
g
g
%
Mass of hydrate (9) x IC
% = (Mass of hydrate- mass of an)
mass of hydrate (g)
% = (1.569-
× 100=
mol
1.569
mol Mol Mass of
anhydrate/MM
of anhydrate
12. What was the color of the hydrate?
blue
What was the color of the…
compared t-critical with t-calculated and 95% confidence interval to answer this question
Comparing two means. Horvat and co-workers used atomic absorption spectroscopy to determine the concentration of Hg in coal fly ash. Of particular interest to the authors was developing an appropriate procedure for digesting samples and releasing the Hg for analysis. As part of their study they tested several reagents for digesting samples. Their results using HNO3 and using a 1+3 mixture of HNO3 and HCl are shown here. All concentrations are given as ppb Hg sample.
HNO3: 161, 165, 160, 167, 166
1+3 HNO3–HCl: 159, 145, 140, 147, 143, 156
Determine whether there is a significant difference between these methods at the 95% confidence interval.
Chapter 5 Solutions
Experimental Organic Chemistry: A Miniscale & Microscale Approach (Cengage Learning Laboratory Series for Organic Chemistry)
Ch. 5.3 - Prob. 1ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 2ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 3ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 4ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 5ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 6ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 7ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 8ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 9ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 10E
Ch. 5.3 - Prob. 11ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 12ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 13ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 14ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 15ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 16ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 17ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 18ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 19ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 20ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 21ECh. 5.3 - Prob. 22ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 1ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 2ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 3ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 4ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 5ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 6ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 7ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 8ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 9ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 10ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 11ECh. 5.4 - Prob. 12E
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Comparison of experimental data to “known” value. Monna and co-workers used radioactive isotopes to date sediments from lakes and estuaries.21 To verify this method they analyzed a 208Po standard known to have an activity of 77.5 decays/min, obtaining the following results. 77.09, 75.37, 72.42, 76.84, 77.84, 76.69, 78.03, 74.96, 77.54, 76.09, 81.12, 75.75 Do the results differ from the expected results at the 95% confidence interval?arrow_forwardExplain the difference between the propagated uncertainty and the standard deviation. Which number would you use to describe the uncertainty in the measurement? if the standard deviation is 0.01 and the propagated uncertainty is 0.03arrow_forwardPropagation of uncertainty. Find the absolute and percent relative uncertainty assuming the ±-values are random error. 7.65±0.04 + 5.28±0.02 – 1.12±0.01 85.6±0.9 × 50.2±0.7 ÷ 13.8±0.5 [4.88±0.07 + 3.22±0.05] / 1.53±0.02arrow_forward
- Explain the difference between the propagated uncertainty and the standard deviation. Which number would you use to describe the uncertainty in the measurement?arrow_forwardCircle the compound in each pair where the indicated bond vibrates at higher frequency. WHY IS THIS? Provide thorough explanation to tie topic.arrow_forwardHow can you distinguish between each pair of compounds below using IR? Cite a bond and frequency that can be used to distinguish. Provide thorough steps and explanation.arrow_forward
- Propagation of uncertainty. Find the absolute and percent relative uncertainty assuming the ±-values are random error. 65±0.04 + 5.28±0.02 – 1.12±0.01 6±0.9 × 50.2±0.7 ÷ 13.8±0.5 [4.88±0.07 + 3.22±0.05] / 1.53±0.02arrow_forwardMatch to correct spectrum and explain the bonds and frequencies used to tell what spectrum connected to the given option. Thanks.arrow_forwardDraw the virtual orbitals for the planar and pyramidal forms of CH3 and for the linear and bent forms of CH2arrow_forward
- Q2: Draw the molecules based on the provided nomenclatures below: (2R,3S)-2-chloro-3-methylpentane: (2S, 2R)-2-hydroxyl-3,6-dimethylheptane:arrow_forwardQ3: Describes the relationship (identical, constitutional isomers, enantiomers or diastereomers) of each pair of compounds below. ག H CH3 OH OH CH3 H3C OH OH OH ////////// C CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 H3C CH 3 C/III..... Physics & Astronomy www.physics.northweste COOH H нош..... H 2 OH HO CH3 HOOC H CH3 CH3 CH3 Br. H H Br and H H H Harrow_forwardQ1: For each molecule, assign each stereocenter as R or S. Circle the meso compounds. Label each compound as chiral or achiral. OH HO CI Br H CI CI Br CI CI Xf x f g Br D OH Br Br H₂N R. IN Ill I -N S OMe D II H CO₂H 1/111 DuckDuckGarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Modern ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305079113Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. ButlerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning
ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Modern Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079113
Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: The Molecular Science
Chemistry
ISBN:9781285199047
Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. Stanitski
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity
Chemistry
ISBN:9781337399074
Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David Treichel
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity
Chemistry
ISBN:9781133949640
Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David Treichel
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Principles and Practice
Chemistry
ISBN:9780534420123
Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward Mercer
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Solutions: Crash Course Chemistry #27; Author: Crash Course;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h2f1Bjr0p4;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY