Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 33P
a:
To determine
Select the project.
b:
To determine
Calculate the future worth through calculator function.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Nikul
Don't upload image please
Dog
The Ecology Group wishes to purchase a piece of equipment for recycling of various metals. Machine 1 costs $123,000, has a life of 10 years, an annual cost of $5000, and requires one operator at a cost of $24 per hour. It can process 10 tons per hour. Machine 2 costs $70,000, has a life of 6 years, an annual cost of $2500, and requires two operators at a cost of $24 per hour each to process 6 tons per hour. Assume i = 7% per year and 2080 hours per work year. Determine the annual breakeven tonnage of scrap metal at i = 7% per year and select the better machine for a processing level of 1500 tons per year.
Chapter 4 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 4 - State two conditions under which the do-nothing...Ch. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - The costs associated with manufacturing a...
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 12PCh. 4 - Prob. 13PCh. 4 - Prob. 14PCh. 4 - Prob. 15PCh. 4 - Prob. 16PCh. 4 - Prob. 17PCh. 4 - Prob. 18PCh. 4 - Prob. 19PCh. 4 - Prob. 20PCh. 4 - Prob. 21PCh. 4 - Prob. 22PCh. 4 - Prob. 23PCh. 4 - Prob. 24PCh. 4 - Prob. 25PCh. 4 - Prob. 26PCh. 4 - Prob. 27PCh. 4 - Prob. 28PCh. 4 - Prob. 29PCh. 4 - Prob. 30PCh. 4 - Prob. 31PCh. 4 - Two mutually exclusive projects have the estimated...Ch. 4 - Prob. 33PCh. 4 - Prob. 34PCh. 4 - Prob. 35PCh. 4 - Prob. 36PCh. 4 - Prob. 37PCh. 4 - The manager of engineering at the 900-megawatt...Ch. 4 - Prob. 39PCh. 4 - Prob. 40PCh. 4 - Prob. 41PCh. 4 - Three different plans were presented to the GAO by...Ch. 4 - The U.S. Army received two proposals for a turnkey...Ch. 4 - Prob. 44PCh. 4 - Prob. 45PCh. 4 - Prob. 46PCh. 4 - Prob. 47PCh. 4 - Prob. 48PCh. 4 - Prob. 49PCh. 4 - Prob. 50PCh. 4 - Prob. 51PCh. 4 - Prob. 52PCh. 4 - Prob. 53PCh. 4 - Prob. 54PCh. 4 - Prob. 55PCh. 4 - Prob. 56PCh. 4 - Prob. 57PCh. 4 - Prob. 58PCh. 4 - Prob. 59PCh. 4 - Prob. 60PCh. 4 - Prob. 61PCh. 4 - Prob. 62PCh. 4 - Prob. 63APQCh. 4 - Prob. 64APQCh. 4 - Prob. 65APQCh. 4 - Prob. 66APQCh. 4 - Prob. 67APQCh. 4 - Prob. 68APQCh. 4 - Prob. 69APQCh. 4 - Prob. 70APQCh. 4 - Prob. 71APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Ecology group wishes to purchase a piece of equipment for recycling of various metals. Machine 1 costs $300000, has a tife of 10 years, an annual cost of $30000, and requires one operator at a cost of $72 per hour. It can process 10 tons per hour. Machine 2 costs $180000, has a life of 6 years, an annual cost of $15000, and requires two operators at a cost of $72 per hour each to process 6 tons per hour. Determine the annual breakeven tonnage of scrap metal at i=10% per year.arrow_forwardTony works for ABC Window Products. While performing an analysis for a new window product, Tony found a report from last year that provided the following information regarding the manufacture of a similar product: annual production rate = 40,000 units; selling price = P70 per unit; fixed production cost = P240,000 per year; variable production cost = P1,700,000 per year; variable selling expenses = P96,000 per year. What is the breakeven production rate per year of the company? Blank 1 unitsarrow_forwardA company plans to purchase new cut-and-finish equipment. Two manufacturers offered the estimates as following: Vendor A has a first cost of $15,000, an annual operating cost of $3,500, a salvage value of $1000, and a service life of 6 years. Vendor B has a first cost of $18,000, an annual operating cost of $3,100, a salvage value of $2,000, and a service life of 9 years. If a study period of 5 years is used and the salvage values are not expected to change, which vendor should be selected? -$26,236, A -$26,636, A -$25,336, A -$24,666, Barrow_forward
- No written by hand solution An electric switch manufacturing company is trying to decide between three different assembly methods. Method A has an estimated first cost of $30,000, an annual operating cost (AOC) of $4,000, and a service life of 2 years. Method B will cost $70,000 to buy and will have an AOC of $3,000 over its 4-year service life. Method C costs $115,000 initially with an AOC of $3,000 over its 8-year life. Methods A and B will have no salvage value, but Method C will have equipment worth 6% of its first cost.arrow_forwardAn electric switch manufacturing company is trying to decide between three different assembly methods. Method A has an estimated first cost of $40,000, an annual operating cost (AOC) of $9000, and a service life of 2 years. Method B will cost $80,000 to buy and will have an AOC of $6000 over its 4-year service life. Method C costs $130,000 initially with an AOC of $4000 over its 8-year life. Methods A and B will have no salvage value, but Method C will have equipment worth 10% of its first cost. Perform both (a) future worth, and (b) present worth analyses to select the method at i = 10% per year.arrow_forwardA remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $7,000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1,250. A new power line will cost $10,500 to install, with power costs expected to be $950 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 9% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis? The future worth of solar cells is $[ and that of electric line is $ (Click to select) should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis. Solar cells Electric linearrow_forward
- A tractor for over-the-road hauling is to be purchased by AgriGrow for $90,000. It is expected to be of use to the company for 6 years, after which it will be salvaged for $4,000. Transportation cost savings are expected to be $170,000 per year; however, the cost of drivers is expected to be $70,000 per year and operating expenses are expected to be $63,000 per year, including fuel, maintenance, insurance and the like. The company’s income-tax rate is 25% and MARR is 10% on after-tax cash flows. Suppose that, to AgriGrow’s surprise, they actually dispose of the tractor at the end of the 4th tax year for $6,000. Develop tables using a spreadsheet to determine the ATCF for each year and the after-tax PW, AW, IRR, and ERR after only 4 years. Use MACRS-GDS and state the appropriate property class. Only calculate PW and IRRarrow_forwardAn engineer is trying to decide which process to use to reduce sludge volume prior to disposal. Belt filter presses (BFP) will cost $203,000 to buy and $85,000 per year to operate. Belts will be replaced one time per year at a cost of $5500. Centrifuges (Cent) will cost $396,000 to buy and $119,000 per year to operate, but because the centrifuge will produce a thicker “cake”, the sludge hauling cost to the monofill will be $37,000 per year less than for the belt presses. The useful lives are 5 and 10 years for alternatives BFP and Cent, respectively, and the salvage values are assumed to be 10% of the first cost of each process whenever they are closed down or replaced. Use PW evaluation to select the more economical process at an interest rate of 6% per year over (a) the LCM of lives, and (b) a study period of 8 years. Are the decisions the same?arrow_forwardA remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $19,000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1,100. A new power line will cost $9,000 to install, with power costs expected to be $800 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 14% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis? The future worth of solar cells is $ and that of electric line is $ Electric line should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis.arrow_forward
- A semiautomatic process has fixed costs of $40,000 per year and variable costs of $30 per unit. An automatic process has fixed costs of $88,000 per year and variable costs of $22 per unit. At what production level per year will the two alternatives break even?arrow_forwardA remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $12,600 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1400. A new power line will cost $11,000 to install, with power costs expected to be $800 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 10% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis?arrow_forwardRequired information An electric switch manufacturing company is trying to decide between three different assembly methods. Method A has an estimated first cost of $38,000, an annual operating cost (AOC) of $10,000, and a service life of 2 years. Method B will cost $79,000 to buy and will have an AOC of $3,000 over its 4-year service life. Method C costs $143,000 initially with an AOC of $3,000 over its 8-year life. Methods A and B will have no salvage value, but Method C will have equipment worth 6% of its first cost. Perform a future worth analysis to select the method at i= 13% per year. The future worth of method A is $55118 The future worth of method B is $ The future worth of method C is $ Method B is selected.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education