The paper “Lessons from Pacemaker Implantations” (Journal of the American Medical Association [1965]: 231–232) gave the results of a study that followed 89 heart patients who had received electronic pacemakers. The time (in months) to the first electrical malfunction of the pacemaker was recorded:
- a. Summarize these data in the form of a frequency distribution, using class intervals of 0 to <6, 6 to <12, and so on.
- b. Calculate the relative frequencies and cumulative relative frequencies for each class interval of the frequency distribution of Part (a).
- c. Show how the relative frequency for the class interval 12 to <18 could be obtained from the cumulative relative frequencies.
- d. Use the cumulative relative frequencies to give approximate answers to the following:
- i. What proportion of those who participated in the study had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year?
- ii. If the pacemaker must be replaced as soon as the first electrical malfunction occurs, approximately what proportion required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation?
- e. Construct a cumulative relative frequency plot, and use it to answer the following questions.
- i. What is the approximate time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed?
- ii. What is the approximate time at which only 10% of the pacemakers initially implanted were still
functioning ?
a.
Construct the frequency distribution for the given data.
Answer to Problem 12CRE
The frequency distribution is given below.
Class interval | Frequency |
0-<6 | 2 |
6-<12 | 10 |
12-<18 | 21 |
18-<24 | 28 |
24-<30 | 22 |
30-<36 | 6 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data represents the time to the first electrical malfunction of the pacemaker for 89 heart patients.
Software procedure:
Frequency distribution:
The number of values lying in the particular interval or the number of times each value repeats is the frequency of that particular class interval or event.
The frequencies are calculated by using the tally mark. Here, the number of times each activity repeats is the frequency of that particular physical activity.
Here, the number of values time under the specified interval is the frequency of that particular class interval of time.
Here, the number of values in between the class interval 0-<6 is 2.
Therefore, the frequency of the class interval 0-<6 is 2.
Similarly, the frequencies of all the remaining class intervals are as follows:
Class interval | Tally | Frequency |
0-<6 | 2 | |
6-<12 | 10 | |
12-<18 | 21 | |
18-<24 | 28 | |
24-<30 | 22 | |
30-<36 | 6 | |
Total | 89 |
b.
Construct the relative frequency distribution for the given data.
Construct the cumulative relative frequency distribution for the given data.
Answer to Problem 12CRE
The relative frequency distribution and cumulative relative frequency distribution are given below.
Class interval | Relative frequency | Cumulative relative frequency |
0-<6 | 0.02247 | 0.02247 |
6-<12 | 0.11236 | 0.13483 |
12-<18 | 0.23596 | 0.37079 |
18-<24 | 0.31461 | 0.6854 |
24-<30 | 0.24719 | 0.39259 |
30-<36 | 0.06742 | 1 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The general formula to obtain the relative frequency is given below:
Substitute the frequency of the class interval 0-<6 as “2” and the total frequency as “89” in relative frequency.
Similarly, relative frequencies for the remaining class intervals are obtained below:
Class interval | Frequency | Relative frequency |
0-<6 | 2 | |
6-<12 | 10 | |
12-<18 | 21 | |
18-<24 | 28 | |
24-<30 | 22 | |
30-<36 | 6 |
Cumulative relative frequency:
Cumulative relative frequency is the sum of relative frequencies of all the previous events which are arranged in an order from smallest to largest value.
The general formula to obtain cumulative frequency using frequency distribution is,
From the relative frequencies, the cumulative relative frequencies are obtained as follows:
Class interval | Relative frequency | Cumulative relative frequency |
0-<6 | 0.02247 | |
6-<12 | 0.11236 | |
12-<18 | 0.23596 | |
18-<24 | 0.31461 | |
24-<30 | 0.24719 | |
30-<36 | 0.06742 |
c.
Obtain the relative frequency for the class interval 12-18 using the cumulative frequency distribution.
Answer to Problem 12CRE
The relative frequency for the class interval 12-18 using the cumulative frequency distribution is 0.23596.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The general formula to obtain cumulative frequency using frequency distribution is given below:
Relative frequency of a present event is obtained using the formula given below:
From the cumulative relative frequency distribution, relative frequency distribution is obtained as given below:
Thus, the relative frequency for the class interval 12-18 using the cumulative frequency distribution is 0.23596.
d.
(i). Find the approximate proportion of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year.
(ii) Find the approximate proportion of heart patients who required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation.
Answer to Problem 12CRE
(i) The approximate proportion of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year is 0.86517.
(ii) The approximate proportion of heart patients who required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation is 0.55057.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The general formula for the relative frequency or proportion is,
(i). Approximate proportion of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year:
The Objective is to find the cumulative relative frequency of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year.
The cumulative relative frequency of heart patients who had pacemakers that malfunction within the first year is 0.13483.
That is, the proportion of heart patients who had pacemakers that malfunction within the first year is 0.13483.
Hence, the cumulative relative frequency of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year is obtained as given below:
Thus, the approximate proportion of heart patients who had pacemakers that did not malfunction within the first year is 0.86517.
(ii). Approximate proportion of heart patients who required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation:
The Objective is to find the relative frequency of heart patients required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation.
The relative frequency of heart patients required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation is obtained as given below:
Thus, the approximate proportion of heart patients who required replacement between 1 and 2 years after implantation is 0.55057.
e.
Plot the cumulative frequency distribution for the given data.
(i) Find the approximate time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed.
(ii) Find the approximate time at which only 10% of the initially implanted pacemakers are functioning.
Answer to Problem 12CRE
Cumulative distribution plot is given below:
(i) The time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed will be in between 18-<24 months.
(ii) The approximate time at which only 10% of the initially implanted pacemakers are functioning will be in between 24-<30 months.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The cumulative relative frequency histogram is plotted for the given data.
Procedure to plot cumulative distribution plot:
Step by step procedure to draw the cumulative distribution plot is given below.
- Draw a horizontal axis and a vertical axis.
- The horizontal axis represents the cumulative frequencies.
- The vertical axis represents the “Time to first malfunction in months”.
- Plot each of the 6 cumulative frequencies corresponding to the time to first malfunction in months.
- Connect all the 6 plotted points of cumulative frequencies with a line.
The general formula for the relative frequency or proportion is,
(i). Approximate time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed:
The Objective is to find the time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed.
From the cumulative relative frequency distribution, 0.6854 corresponds to the interval 18-<24 months.
The cumulative relative frequency of 0.5 is less than the cumulative relative frequency of 0.6854.
Thus, the time at which 50% of the pacemakers had failed will be in between 18-<24 months.
(ii). Approximate time at which only 10% of the initially implanted pacemakers are functioning:
The Objective is to find the time only 10% of the initially implanted pacemakers are functioning.
In other words it can be said that, the time at which 90% of the pacemakers had failed.
From the cumulative relative frequency distribution, 0.93259 corresponds to the interval 24-<30 months.
The cumulative relative frequency of 0.9 is less than the cumulative relative frequency of 0.93259.
Thus, the time at which only 10% of the initially implanted pacemakers are functioning will be in between 24-<30 months.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Introduction To Statistics And Data Analysis
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
Essential Statistics
Statistics for Business & Economics, Revised (MindTap Course List)
Statistical Reasoning for Everyday Life (5th Edition)
- Urban Travel Times Population of cities and driving times are related, as shown in the accompanying table, which shows the 1960 population N, in thousands, for several cities, together with the average time T, in minutes, sent by residents driving to work. City Population N Driving time T Los Angeles 6489 16.8 Pittsburgh 1804 12.6 Washington 1808 14.3 Hutchinson 38 6.1 Nashville 347 10.8 Tallahassee 48 7.3 An analysis of these data, along with data from 17 other cities in the United States and Canada, led to a power model of average driving time as a function of population. a Construct a power model of driving time in minutes as a function of population measured in thousands b Is average driving time in Pittsburgh more or less than would be expected from its population? c If you wish to move to a smaller city to reduce your average driving time to work by 25, how much smaller should the city be?arrow_forwardA researcher is interested in the relationship between birth order and personality (outgoing versus reserved). A sample of n = 100 people is obtained, all of whom grew up in families as one of three children. Each person is given a personality test, and the researcher also records the person’s birth-order position (1st born, 2nd, or 3rd). The frequencies from this study are shown in the following table. On the basis of these data, can the researcher conclude that there is a significant relation between birth order and personality? Test at the .05 level of significance. 1st 2nd 3rd Outgoing 13 31 16 Reserved 17 19 4arrow_forward#10).arrow_forward
- In a study, 10 healthy men were exposed to diesel exhaust for 1 hour. A measure of brain activity (called median power frequency, or MPF in Hz) was recorded at two different locations in the brain both before and after the diesel exhaust exposure. The resulting data are given in the accompanying table. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample of 10 men is representative of healthy adult males. Subject MPF (in Hz) Location 1before Location 1after Location 2before Location 2after 1 6.4 8.0 6.9 9.4 2 8.6 12.7 9.5 11.2 3 7.4 8.4 6.6 10.2 4 8.6 9.0 9.0 9.7 5 9.8 8.4 9.6 9.2 6 8.9 11.0 9.0 11.9 7 9.1 14.4 7.9 9.3 8 7.4 11.1 8.1 9.1 9 6.7 7.3 7.2 8.0 10 8.9 11.2 7.4 9.3 Construct a 90% confidence interval estimate for the difference in mean MPF at brain location 1 (in Hz) before and after exposure to diesel exhaust. (Hint: See Example 13.7.) (Use ?d = ?before − ?after. Use a table or technology. Round your answers to two decimal places.)…arrow_forward3. Find the 2-score of the following data: μ=77.1, 5.1, and x=841 => Z-score=arrow_forwardThe shares of the U.S. automobile market held in 1990 by General Motors, Japanese manufacturers, Ford, Chrysler, and other manufacturers were, respectively, 34%, 27%, 18%, 13%, and 8%. Suppose that a new survey of 1,000 new-car buyers shows the following purchase frequencies: GM 390 Japanese Ford Chrysler 192 241 81 picture Click here for the Excel Data File (a) Show that it is appropriate to carry out a chi-square test using these data. Each expected value is x^2 Other 96 (b) Determine whether the current market shares differ from those of 1990. Use a = .05. (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.) Do not reject Reject HO. Conclude current market shares from those of 1990.arrow_forward
- A group of businessmen are interested in determining if there is a relationship between sales and proximity of a store to a street intersection. A study was conducted to help them decide whether to rent or buy property near an intersection or far from it. A random sample of stores were selected and their average weekly sales taken and recorded as follows: Distance from street corner (meters) Sales (Pesos) 8 4000 4 3000 9 11000 3 5000 2 9000 5 6000 4 14000 7 9000 1 10000 11 15000 8 19000 9 17000 3 10000 4 14000 6 18000 1. What is the degree of relationship between the two variables?2. If the the businessmen's decision is to be based solely on the correlation coefficient, should they rent or buy a property near or far fro a street intersection?arrow_forwardA student is eludying the migration pattems of several birds. She collects the data in the table. of rd () 3.0 Distasce Traveled (on) 276 4.5 10.0 1,909 2,356 25.0 What conclusion can the student make? (SC.5.N.1.1) O The distances bird travel is independent of their size. O Birds more than ten grams in weight are more likely to travel. O The smallest bird traveled the greatest distance. O The largest birds stay in the same habitat all year.arrow_forwardBased on data collected by the U.S. General Social Survey, a researcher examines the frequency with which adults responded to two questions. The first asked people if they resided in the same city or town now as when they were 16 years old (Residence). The second asked if they found life generally exciting, routine, or dull (Life). Using data from 2,791 people, the results are below. Life is Generally: Living in: Exciting Routine Dull Marginal n Same City or Town O = 489 E = O = 601 E = O = 64 E = 1154 Different Area O = 797 E = O = 763 E = O = 77 E = 1637 Marginal n 1286 1364 141 2791 Using the chi-square (χ2) test for independence, examine if the feelings people have about life in general are related to living in the same city or town as when a teen. State the hypotheses (H0 and H1). Find the critical value for α = .05, 1-tailed. Calculate the test statistic (χ2), filling in relevant portions of the…arrow_forward
- The Fish and Game Department stocked a lake with fish in the following proportions: 30% catfish, 15% bass, 40% bluegil, and 15% pike. Five years later it sampled the lake to see if the distribution of fish had changed. It found that the 500 fish in the sample were distributed as follows. Catfish Bass Bluegill Pike 89 122 218 71 A USE SALT In the 5-year interval, did the distribution of fish change at the 0.05 level? (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and altemate hypotheses. OH.: The distributions are the same. H.: The distributions are different. OH,: The distributions are different. H,: The distributions are different. OH,: The distributions are different. H,: The distributions are the same. O H: The distributions are the same. H,: The distributions are the same. (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) O Are all the expected frequencies greater than 57 O Yes O No What sampling distribution will vou…arrow_forwardIn a 1965 report, Lea discussed the relationship between mean annual temperature and the mortality rate for a type of breast cancer in women. The subjects were residents of certain regions of Great Britain, Norway, and Sweden. The table below provides the mean average temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit the the mortality rates (deaths per 100,000) for each of the 16 regions. Reference: A.J. Lea. (1965). New Observations on Distribution of Neoplasms of Female Breast in Certain Countries. British Medical Journal, 1, 488-490. 110 100- 90 80 60 50 40 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Temperature (F) Click on the Data button shown below to display the data and copy and paste it into a statistical software package. Click the Data button a second time to hide the data. Data 1. Which variable is the explanatory variable? O mortality rate temperature 2. Which variable is the response variable? O temperature O mortality rate 3. Compute the correlation coefficient between the average annual temperature and…arrow_forwardNumber 14 parts d and e.arrow_forward
- Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage LearningHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill