Concept explainers
Native languages: The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los Angeles in the year 2009. The Total column presents the numbers of households in both cities combined.
Source: US. Census Bureau
- Construct a frequency bar graph for each city.
- Construct a frequency bar graph for the total.
- Construct a relative frequency bar graph for each city.
- Construct a relative frequency bar graph for the total.
- Explain why the heights of the bars for the frequency bar graph for the total are equal to the sums of the heights for the individual cities.
- Explain why the heights of the bars for the relative frequency bar graph for the total are not equal to the sums of the heights for the individual cities.
a.
To construct:A frequency bar graph for each city.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of NewYork and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
.
Solution:
From the given table, the frequency bar graph for New York is given by
The frequency bar graph for Los Angeles is given by
b.
To construct: A frequency bar graph for the total.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
.
Solution:
From the given table, the frequency bar graph for the total is given by
c.
To construct:A relative frequency bar graph for each city.
Explanation of Solution
The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
Formula used:
Solution:
From the given table,
The sum of all frequency for New York city is 7623.
The table of relative frequency for New York city is given by
Language | New York | Relative Frequency |
English | 4098 | |
Spanish | 1870 | |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 |
From the given table, the relative frequency bar graph for New York is given by
The sum of all frequency for Los Angeles is 3432.
The table of relative frequency for Los Angeles city is given by
Language | Los Angeles | Relative Frequency |
English | 1339 | |
Spanish | 1555 | |
Other Indo-European | 237 | |
Asian and Pacific Island | 301 |
The relative frequency bar graph for Los Angeles is given by
d.
To construct: A relative frequency bar graph for the total.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
Formula used:
Solution:
From the given table,
The sum of all frequency for total city is 11055.
The table of relative frequency for New York city is given by
Language | Total | Relative Frequency |
English | 5437 | |
Spanish | 3425 | |
Other Indo-European | 1274 | |
Asian and Pacific Island | 919 |
From the given table, the relative frequency bar graph for the total is given by
e.
To explain: The heights of the bars for the frequency bar graph for the total are equal to the sum of the heights for the individual cities.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
Since each total frequency of households is the sum of the frequencies for the cities of New York and Los Angeles, therefore, the heights of the bars for the frequency bar graph for the total are equal to the sum of the heights for the individual cities.
f.
To explain: The heights of the bars for the relative frequency bar graph for the total are not equal to the sum of the heights for the individual cities.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The following frequency distribution presents the number of households (in thousands) categorized by the language spoken at home, for the cities of New York and Los An
geles in the year 2009. The total column presents the number of households in both cities combined
Language | New York | Los Angeles | Total |
English | 4098 | 1339 | 5437 |
Spanish | 1870 | 1555 | 3425 |
Other Indo-European | 1037 | 237 | 1274 |
Asian and Pacific Island | 618 | 301 | 919 |
The relative frequency is the frequency divided by the sum of all frequency.
The sum of all frequencies for each city is not equal to the sum of all total frequencies; therefore, the sum of relative frequency for each city will not be equal to the relative frequency for total.
Hence, the heights of the bars for the relative frequency bar graph for the total are not equal to the sum of the heights for the individual cities.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Elementary Statistics 2nd Edition
- T1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Characterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forward
- Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt