Suggestion on the language designed by committee:

It may be a bad idea to get a language designed by a committee because of the following reasons:

Involvement of so many people in a language design may result in a bad design.

Every person would have their own opinion on how the program should behave once it is executed, syntax followed, and so on.

History has proven time and again that languages like ALGOL 68, PL/I and Ada are all designed by committees.

These did not fulfill the expectations of a good programming design that could have been scaled.

Most of the successful languages were raised, rather than planned and designed.

This means that when there are lots of people using it for development purposes, they come up with extensions and requirements on their own.

These lead to development of APIs, usable functions enhancements, and so on.

Even though different opinions, suggestions and feature additions are benefit to the language design, often proposals from one group or person can get rejected by others...

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Chapter 2, Problem 16PS

Chapter 2, Problem 18PS

Students have asked these similar questions

What are the benefits of making the effort to learn new languages? How far should the semantics of programming languages be abstracted? What do you want to get out of this experience? Could you kindly elaborate on your line of thought?

What are some of the criticisms that might be leveled against the idea of using a single programming language across all fields?

What are some of the criticisms that might be levelled against the idea of using a single programming language across all fields?

Chapter 2 Solutions

Concepts of Programming Languages (11th Edition)

Ch. 2 - In what year was Plankalkl designed? In what year...Ch. 2 - What two common data structures were included in...Ch. 2 - How were the pseudocodes of the early 1950s...Ch. 2 - Speedcoding was invented to overcome two...Ch. 2 - Prob. 5RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 6RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 7RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 8RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 9RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 10RQ

Ch. 2 - Prob. 11RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 12RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 13RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 14RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 15RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 16RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 17RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 18RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 19RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 20RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 21RQ Ch. 2 - On what programming language was COBOL based?Ch. 2 - In what year did the COBOL design process begin?Ch. 2 - What data structure that appeared in COBOL...Ch. 2 - What organization was most responsible for the...Ch. 2 - Prob. 26RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 27RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 28RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 29RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 30RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 31RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 32RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 33RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 34RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 35RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 36RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 37RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 38RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 39RQ Ch. 2 - What Ada construct provides support for abstract...Ch. 2 - What populates the Smalltalk world?Ch. 2 - Prob. 42RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 43RQ Ch. 2 - From what language does Objective-C borrow its...Ch. 2 - Prob. 45RQ Ch. 2 - What do the Ada and COBOL languages have in...Ch. 2 - What was the first application for Java?Ch. 2 - Prob. 48RQ Ch. 2 - How does the typing system of PHP and JavaScript...Ch. 2 - Prob. 50RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 51RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 52RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 53RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 54RQ Ch. 2 - What data structure does Python use in place of...Ch. 2 - Prob. 56RQ Ch. 2 - What characteristic of Rubys arithmetic operators...Ch. 2 - Prob. 58RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 59RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 60RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 61RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 62RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 63RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 64RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 65RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 66RQ Ch. 2 - Prob. 1PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 2PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 3PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 4PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 5PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 6PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 7PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 8PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 9PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 10PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 11PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 12PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 13PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 14PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 15PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 16PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 17PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 18PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 19PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 20PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 21PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 22PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 23PS Ch. 2 - Prob. 24PS

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Solution Summary: The author opines that it is a bad idea to get languages designed by committees because everyone has their own opinion on how the program should behave, syntax followed, etc.

Concept explainers

Explanation of Solution

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 2 Solutions