Concept explainers
Given the following information on job times and due dates, determine the optimal processing sequence using (1) FCFS, (2) SPT, (3) EDD, and (4) CR. For each method, find the average job flow time and the average job tardiness. Jobs are listed in order of arrival.
1)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule First Come First Served (FCFS).
Introduction: First Come First Served is the scheduling rule, which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, the first come would be served first.
Answer to Problem 17P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) |
a | 3.5 | 7 |
b | 2.0 | 6 |
c | 4.5 | 18 |
d | 5.0 | 22 |
e | 2.5 | 4 |
f | 6.0 | 20 |
Determine the sequence using FCFS:
According to FCFS, the first come would be served first. Hence, the jobs should be sequenced in the order as per its arrival.
Hence, the sequence of jobs using FCFS is a-b-c-d-e.
2)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule Shortest Processing Time (SPT).
Introduction: Shortest Processing Tine is the scheduling rule, which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, job with the shortest duration would be served first. Then, the process would be going on from shortest to largest duration.
Answer to Problem 17P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) |
a | 3.5 | 7 |
b | 2.0 | 6 |
c | 4.5 | 18 |
d | 5.0 | 22 |
e | 2.5 | 4 |
f | 6.0 | 20 |
Determine the sequence using SPT:
According to SPT, the job that has the shortest processing would be served first and it goes on as the processing time increase. Duration should be assembled in the ascending order
Hence, the sequence of jobs using SPT is b-e-a-c-d-f.
3)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule Earliest Due Date (EDD).
Introduction: Earliest Due Date is the scheduling rule, which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, job with the earliest due date would be served first. Then, the process would be going on from earliest due date to latest due date.
Answer to Problem 17P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) |
a | 3.5 | 7 |
b | 2.0 | 6 |
c | 4.5 | 18 |
d | 5.0 | 22 |
e | 2.5 | 4 |
f | 6.0 | 20 |
Determine the sequence using EDD:
According to EDD, the job that has the earliest due date would be served first and it goes on as the due date increases. The job should be arranged based on due date. Due date should be assembled in the ascending order
Hence, the sequence of jobs using EDD is e-b-a-c-f-d.
4)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule critical ratio.
Introduction: Critical ratio is kind of scheduling rule that helps to identify that, the task or job is on the correct track. It would help to identify if the task is behind or ahead of the schedule.
Answer to Problem 17P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) |
a | 3.5 | 7 |
b | 2.0 | 6 |
c | 4.5 | 18 |
d | 5.0 | 22 |
e | 2.5 | 4 |
f | 6.0 | 20 |
Determine the sequence using critical ratio:
Initial critical ratio should be determined at day 0:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Critical ratio |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 2. |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 3 |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 4 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 4.4 |
e | 2.5 | 4 | 1.6 |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 3.33 |
Critical ratio for Job a:
It is can be determined by dividing the value attained by subtracting the completion day of previous job from the due date of current job with the processing time.
Note: The procedure continues for all the jobs.
Job e has the lowest critical ratio. Thus, it will be completed first. Hence, Job e would be completed first in the sequence of jobs.
Determine the critical ratio after the completion of Job a:
As the processing time of job a is 2.5 hours, completion day of completed day would be 2.5.
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Critical ratio |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 1.29 |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 1.75 |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 3.44 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 3.90 |
e | |||
f | 6.0 | 20 | 2.90 |
Critical ratio for Job a:
It is can be determined by dividing the value attained by subtracting the completion day of completed job from the due date of current job with the processing time.
Note: The procedure continues for all the jobs.
Job a has the lowest critical ratio. Hence, Job a would be completed next in the sequence of jobs after Job e.
Determine the critical ratio after the completion of Job e and Job a:
As the processing time of job e is 2.5 hours and Job a is 3.5, completion day of completed day would be 6 (2.5+3.5).
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Critical ratio |
a | |||
b | 2.0 | 6 | 0 |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 2.67 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 3.20 |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 2.33 |
Critical ratio for Job b:
It is can be determined by dividing the value attained by subtracting the completion day of completed job from the due date of current job with the processing time.
Note: The procedure continues for all the jobs.
Job b has the lowest critical ratio. Hence, Job b would be completed next in the sequence of jobs after Job e and Job a.
Determine the critical ratio after the completion of Job e, Job a, and Job b:
As the processing time of job e is 2.5 hours, Job a is 3.5, and Job b is 2. Completion day of completed day would be 8 (2.5+3.5+2).
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Critical ratio |
a | |||
b | |||
c | 4.5 | 18 | 2.22 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 2.80 |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 2.00 |
Critical ratio for Job c:
It is can be determined by dividing the value attained by subtracting the completion day of completed job from the due date of current job with the processing time.
Note: The procedure continues for all the jobs.
Job f has the lowest critical ratio. Hence, Job f would be completed next in the sequence of jobs.
Determine the critical ratio after the completion of Job e, Job a, Job b, and Job f:
As the processing time of job e is 2.5 hours, Job a is 3.5, Job b is 2, and Job f is 6.0. Completion day of completed day would be 14 (2.5+3.5+2+6).
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Critical ratio |
a | |||
b | |||
c | 4.5 | 18 | 2.22 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 2.80 |
f |
Critical ratio for Job c:
It is can be determined by dividing the value attained by subtracting the completion day of completed job from the due date of current job with the processing time.
Note: The procedure continues for all the jobs.
Job c has the lowest critical ratio. Hence, Job c would be completed next in the sequence of jobs.
As Job d is the remaining job, it will be completed next.
Hence, the sequence of jobs using critical ratio is e-a-b-f-c-d.
Determine the average flow time and average tardiness:
First Come First Served:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Flow time | Tardiness |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 3.5 | |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 5.5 | |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 10.0 | |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 15.0 | |
e | 2.5 | 4 | 17.5 | 13.5 |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 23.5 | 3.5 |
Total | 23.5 | 75.0 | 17.0 |
Supporting calculation:
Processing time and due date are given for each job. Flow time is the cumulative of the processing time.
Tardiness of Job a, Job, b, Job c, and Job d:
Flow time of Job a, Job b, Job c, and Job d is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no tardiness.
Tardiness of Job e:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job e is 13.5.
Tardiness of Job f:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job f is 3.5.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time and number of jobs.
Hence, average flow time is 12.5 hours.
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total tardiness and number of jobs.
Hence, average tardiness is 2.83 hours
Shortest processing time:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Flow time | Tardiness |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 2.0 | |
e | 2.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 0.5 |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 8.0 | 1.0 |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 12.5 | |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 17.5 | |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 23.5 | 3.5 |
Total | 23.5 | 68.0 | 5.0 |
Supporting calculation:
Processing time and due date are given for each job. Flow time is the cumulative of the processing time.
Tardiness of Job b, Job c, and Job d:
Flow time of Job b, Job c, and Job d is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no tardiness.
Tardiness of Job e:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job e is 0.5.
Tardiness of Job a:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job a is 1.
Tardiness of Job f:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job f is 3.5.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time and number of jobs.
Hence, average flow time is 11.33 hours.
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total tardiness and number of jobs.
Hence, average tardiness is 0.83 hours
Earliest Due Date:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Flow time | Tardiness |
e | 2.5 | 4 | 2.5 | |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 4.5 | |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 8.0 | 1.0 |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 12.5 | |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 18.5 | |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 23.5 | 1.5 |
Total | 23.5 | 69.5 | 2.5 |
Supporting calculation:
Processing time and due date are given for each job. Flow time is the cumulative of the processing time.
Tardiness of Job e, Job b, Job c, and Job f:
Flow time of Job e, Job b, Job c, and Job f is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no tardiness.
Tardiness of Job a:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job a is 1.
Tardiness of Job d:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job d is 1.5.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time and number of jobs.
Hence, average flow time is 11.58 hours.
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total tardiness and number of jobs.
Hence, average tardiness is 0.42 hours
Critical ratio:
Job | Job time (hours) | Due date (hours) | Flow time | Tardiness |
e | 2.5 | 4 | 2.5 | |
a | 3.5 | 7 | 6.0 | |
b | 2.0 | 6 | 8.0 | 2.0 |
f | 6.0 | 20 | 14.0 | |
c | 4.5 | 18 | 18.5 | 0.5 |
d | 5.0 | 22 | 23.5 | 1.5 |
Total | 23.5 | 72.5 | 4.0 |
Supporting calculation:
Processing time and due date are given for each job. Flow time is the cumulative of the processing time.
Tardiness of Job e, Job a, and Job f:
Flow time of Job e, Job a, and Job f is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no tardiness.
Tardiness of Job b:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job b is 2.
Tardiness of Job c:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job c is 0.5.
Tardiness of Job d:
It is calculated by subtracting the flow time of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job d is 1.5.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time and number of jobs.
Hence, average flow time is 12.08 hours.
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total tardiness and number of jobs.
Hence, average tardiness is 0.67 hours.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Operations Management
- a. With the aid of examples, define discrimination. b. Fully discuss any four (4) types of discrimination in the workplacearrow_forwardRead the Following Extract and Answer the Questions that Follows:The word politics has a somewhat negative connotation. It suggests that someone is attempting touse means or to gain ends that are not sanctioned by the organisation. Political behaviour, as we’vedefined it is quite neutral. Similarly, power is not inherently negative. Whether a person viewspower and politics as unsavoury topics depends on several considerations, most important perhapsbeing where the individual stands on a specific issue in each situation. Nonetheless, most managersare reluctant to admit to political character of their own work settings.Discuss any Five (5) Political tactics you know.arrow_forwardDescribe current features of Cigna Accredo pharmacy own appraisal forms and compare the system used against the textbook’s description of desirable features of appraisal forms. What improvements would you recommend and why?arrow_forward
- Provide a recommendation of a combination of different methods of performance data that could be used to arrive at an overall score for each person being rated in cigna Accredo pharmacy. Explain the comprehensive system you have recommended and why you have chosen this combination of tools. Support your answer with research.arrow_forwardAlready got wrong answer Plz Don't use chatgptarrow_forwardThe RTY calculation for the following process steps would be: A ➡ ○ A.YA+YB+YC+YD OB. (YA)(YB)(YCYD) OC. ((YA+YB+YC+YD)/4)*4 ○ D. (1/YA)+(1/YB)+(1/YC)+YD B C Darrow_forward
- Can you guys help me with this? 1. What did you learn about the case, the concepts of transformational leadership; transactional leadership; Herzberg's Two Factors; Maslow's Hierarchy of needs theories that been applied through the case? Here is the case: Theranos (2003-2018):Overview: Theranos promised to revolutionize blood testing but was exposed formisleading claims about its technology, leading to its collapse 2. What did you learn about the case between Elon Musk and Twitter, the concepts of transformational leadership; transactional leadership; Herzberg's Two Factors Theory; Maslow's Hierarchy of needs theories that been applied through the case? 3. What did you learn about the case of Blockbuster's decline and their failure to adapt with digital streaming, the concepts of autocratic leadership; transactional leadership; Herzberg's Two Factors; Maslow's Hierarchy of needs theories that been applied through the case?arrow_forwardCan you guys help me with this? 1. What did you learn about the case, the concepts of transformational leadership; transactional leadership; Herzberg's Two Factors; and Maslow's Hierarchy of needs theories that have been applied through the case? Here is the case: The COVID-19 Pandemic Response (2020-Present): Overview: Global leaders had to navigate an unprecedented health crisis, balancingpublic health needs with economic pressures. 2. What did you learn about the case, the concepts of transformational leadership; transactional leadership; Herzberg's Two Factors Theory; and Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs theories that have been applied through the case? Here's the case: Google Glass (2013):Overview: Google launched its augmented reality glasses with high expectations, butprivacy concerns and limited functionality led to poor adoption 3. What did you learn about the case of Kodak's failure to keep up with digital photography, the concepts of autocratic leadership; transformational…arrow_forwardWith the above information do the following:1. Based on the From-To chart presented develop an ActivityRelationship Chart for this operation.2. Develop a Space-Relationship Diagram for this operation.3. Evaluate the actual layout using the “Distance Traveled byProduct” technique discussed in class (use rectilinear distance inall calculations).4. Develop two layout improvement alternatives.5. Evaluate alternatives using the “Distance Traveled by Product”technique discussed in class (use rectilinear distance in allcalculations).6. Make a layout recommendation based on alternatives evaluatedarrow_forward
- Provide at least two examples of layouts strategies for the table attached. We provided an example for office. Office Retail Warehouse (storage) Project (fixed position) Job shop (process oriented) Work cell (product families) Repetitive/Continuous (product oriented)arrow_forwardBy integrating theory and application by referencing pertinent theories and practical corporate examples, detail the evolution of qualityarrow_forwardI need typing clear urjent no chatgpt used i will give 5 upvotes pls full explainarrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Operations ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781259667473Author:William J StevensonPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationOperations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781259666100Author:F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B ChasePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningProduction and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781478623069Author:Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon OlsenPublisher:Waveland Press, Inc.