An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Note: Please provide a clear, step-by-step simplified handwritten working out (no explanations!), ensuring it is done without any AI involvement. I require an expert-level answer, and I will assess and rate based on the quality and accuracy of your work and refer to the provided image for more clarity. Make sure to double-check everything for correctness before submitting thanks!. Question1: If the following container is 0.6m high, 1.2m wide and half full with water, determine the pressure acting at points A, B, and C if ax=2.6ms^-2.

Please read the image

Chapter 12 - Lecture Notes.pptx: (MAE 272-01) (SP25) DY... Scores

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Answer 6

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.

Answer 7

Chapter 12, Problem 1RQ

To determine

An advantage of state space techniques over root locus techniques while placing the closed-loop poles for transient response design.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The major drawback in frequency domain designing method using root locus technique is that even after designing the location of dominant second-order poles it is not sure whether the higher poles will affect the second order approximation or not. Since root locus does not allow the parameters to place all the closed-loop poles uniquely, so all poles in the system cannot be specified for a higher order than 2. Total n adjustable parameters are required, to place n unknown quantities. In case of root locus, either there is one gain to adjust or compensator pole-zero pair to select, which does not add up to number of parameters for placing closed loop poles at their desired locations.

State space techniques introduce into the system to overcome all these drawbacks. These includes other adjustable parameters as well as the technique used to find these parameters. Thus, allowing to place all poles (both dominant and non-dominant) of a closed-loop system.