Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)
4th Edition
ISBN: 9781305970663
Author: Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 34P
1.
To determine
Compute the maximum transfer price the Plant S would accept.
2.
To determine
Compute the minimum transfer price that Plant M would accept.
3.
To determine
Identify the impact of given environmental factors on the transfer pricing decisions.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Wheelco, Inc. manufactures automobile and truck wheels. The company produces four basic, highvolume wheels used by each of the large automobile and pickup truck manufacturers. Wheelco also has two specialty wheel lines. These are fancy, complicated wheels used in expensive sports cars. Lately, Wheelco’s profits have been declining. Foreign competitors have been undercutting Wheelco’s prices in three of its bread-and-butter product lines, and Wheelco’s sales volume and market share have declined. In contrast, Wheelco’s specialty wheels have been selling steadily, although in relatively small numbers, in spite of three recent price increases. At a recent staff meeting, Wheelco’s presidentmade the following remarks: “Our profits are going down the tubes, folks. It costs us 29 dollars to manufacture our A22 wheel. That’s our best seller, with a volume last year of 17,000 units. But our chief competitor is selling basically the same wheel for 27 bucks. I don’t see how they can do it. I…
Wheelco, Inc., manufactures automobile and truck wheels. The company produces four basic, high-volume wheels used by each of the large automobile and pickup truck manufacturers. Wheelco also has two specialty wheel lines. These are fancy, complicated wheels used inexpensive sports cars.
Lately, Wheelco's profits have been declining. Foreign competitors have been undercutting Wheelco's prices in three of its bread-and-butter product lines, and Wheelco's sales volume and market share have declined. In contrast, Wheelco's specialty wheels have been selling steadily, although in relatively small numbers, in spite of three recent price increases. At a recent staff meeting, Wheelco's president made the following remarks: "Our profits are going down the tubes, folks. It costs us 29 dollars to manufacture our A22 wheel. That's our best-seller, with a volume last year of 17,000 units. But our chief competitor is selling basically the same wheel for 27 bucks. I don't see how they can…
Barbour Corporation, located in Buffalo, New York, is a retailer of high-tech products and is known for its excellent quality and
innovation. Recently, the firm conducted a relevant cost analysis of one of its product lines that has only two products, T-1 and T-2. The
sales for T-2 are decreasing and the purchase costs are increasing. The firm might drop T-2 and sell only T-1.
Barbour allocates fixed costs to products on the basis of sales revenue. When the president of Barbour saw the income statements
(see below), he agreed that T-2 should be dropped. If T-2 is dropped, sales of T-1 are expected to increase by 10 percent next year, but
the firm's cost structure will remain the same.
Sales
Variable costs:
Cost of goods sold
Selling & administrative
Contribution margin
es
Fixed expenses:
Fixed corporate costs
Fixed selling and administrative
Total fixed expenses
Operating income
Required:
T-1
$ 200,000
70,000
20,000
$ 110,000
58,700
14,300
$ 73,000
T-2
$ 260,000
130,000
50,000
$ 80,000…
Chapter 10 Solutions
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1DQCh. 10 - Explain why firms choose to decentralize.Ch. 10 - Explain how access to local information can...Ch. 10 - What are margin and turnover? Explain how these...Ch. 10 - What are the three benefits of ROI? Explain how...Ch. 10 - What are two disadvantages of ROI? Explain how...Ch. 10 - What is residual income? Explain how residual...Ch. 10 - Prob. 8DQCh. 10 - Prob. 9DQCh. 10 - What is a transfer price?
Ch. 10 - Prob. 11DQCh. 10 - If the minimum transfer price of the selling...Ch. 10 - If an outside, perfectly competitive market exists...Ch. 10 - Prob. 14DQCh. 10 - Prob. 15DQCh. 10 - Forchen, Inc., provided the following information...Ch. 10 - Refer to Cornerstone Exercise 10.1. Forchen, Inc.,...Ch. 10 - Ignacio, Inc., had after-tax operating income last...Ch. 10 - Prob. 4CECh. 10 - Prob. 5CECh. 10 - Prob. 6CECh. 10 - Jarriot, Inc., presented two years of data for its...Ch. 10 - Refer to Exercise 10.7 for data. At the end of...Ch. 10 - Refer to the data given in Exercise 10.8....Ch. 10 - Brewster Company manufactures elderberry wine....Ch. 10 - Xenold, Inc., manufactures and sells cooktops and...Ch. 10 - Prob. 12ECh. 10 - Jocassee Furniture Manufacturing, Inc., has a...Ch. 10 - Prob. 14ECh. 10 - Mossfort, Inc., has a division in Canada that...Ch. 10 - A multinational corporation has a number of...Ch. 10 - Consider the data for each of the following four...Ch. 10 - The following selected data pertain to the Argent...Ch. 10 - Prob. 19ECh. 10 - The key difference between residual income and EVA...Ch. 10 - If sales and average operating assets for Year 2...Ch. 10 - Prob. 22ECh. 10 - Refer to 10.22. If the imputed interest rate is...Ch. 10 - A company had WACC (weighted average cost of...Ch. 10 - Prob. 25PCh. 10 - Raddington Industries produces tool and die...Ch. 10 - Prob. 27PCh. 10 - Prob. 28PCh. 10 - Oriole, Inc., owns a number of food service...Ch. 10 - Prob. 30PCh. 10 - Prob. 31PCh. 10 - Renslen, Inc., a truck manufacturing conglomerate,...Ch. 10 - Jump Start Company (JSC), a subsidiary of Mason...Ch. 10 - Prob. 34PCh. 10 - Grate Care Company specializes in producing...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Barbour Corporation, located in Buffalo, New York, is a retailer of high-tech products and is known for its excellent quality and innovation. Recently, the firm conducted a relevant cost analysis of one of its product lines that has only two products, T-1 and T-2. The sales for T-2 are decreasing and the purchase costs are increasing. The firm might drop T-2 and sell only T-1. Barbour allocates fixed costs to products on the basis of sales revenue. When the president of Barbour saw the income statements (see below), he agreed that T-2 should be dropped. If T-2 is dropped, sales of T-1 are expected to increase by 10 percent next year, but the firm's cost structure will remain the same. Sales Variable costs: Cost of goods sold Selling & administrative Contribution margin Fixed expenses: Fixed corporate costs Fixed selling and administrative Total fixed expenses Operating income T-1 $ 235,000 77,000 17,000 $ 141,000 1. 2. Required % increase in sales from T-1 3. Required % increase in…arrow_forwardBarbour Corporation, located in Buffalo, New York, is a retailer of high-tech products and is known for its excellent quality and innovation. Recently, the firm conducted a relevant cost analysis of one of its product lines that has only two products, T-1 and T-2. The sales for T-2 are decreasing and the purchase costs are increasing. The firm might drop T-2 and sell only T-1. Barbour allocates fixed costs to products on the basis of sales revenue. When the president of Barbour saw the income statements (see below), he agreed that T-2 should be dropped. If T-2 is dropped, sales of T-1 are expected to increase by 10 percent next year, but the firm's cost structure will remain the same. Sales Variable costs: Cost of goods sold Selling & administrative Contribution margin Fixed expenses: Fixed corporate costs. Fixed selling and administrative Total fixed expenses Operating income Required: T-1 $ 200,000 70,000 20,000 $ 110,000 58,700 14,300 $ 73,000 T-2 $ 260,000 130,000 50,000 $ 80,000…arrow_forwardSagararrow_forward
- Alpesharrow_forwardIn the last 6 months, demand for one of Appleby Company's products has dropped off considerably, due mainly to it becoming obsolescent as a result of technological change. Knowing that the equipment used in the manufacture of this product may not be easy to sell, Appleby spent $50,000 on consultants to determine whether it could use the equipment to produce a new product under license by another company. The consultant has determined that this product would have variable production costs of $65 per unit and should sell at a price of $90/unit. The licensing royalty is 5% of gross product revenue. Estimated annual demand is 20,000 units per year. Additional annual operating costs related to this product are $30,000/year (excluding depreciation). Depreciation on the equipment is $15,000. Annual depreciation expense is a: O a. Sunk cost O b. Relevant cost O c. Both sunk and Irrelevant cost Od. Irrelevant costarrow_forwardRahularrow_forward
- Wright Plastic Products is a small company that specialized in the production of plastic dinner plates until several years ago. Although profits for the company had been good, they have been declining in recent years because of increased competition. Many competitors offer a full range of plastic products, and management felt that this created a competitive disadvantage. The output of the companys plants was exclusively devoted to plastic dinner plates. Three years ago, management made a decision to add additional product lines. They determined that existing idle capacity in each plant could easily be adapted to produce other plastic products. Each plant would produce one additional product line. For example, the Atlanta plant would add a line of plastic cups. Moreover, the variable cost of producing a package of cups (one dozen) was virtually identical to that of a package of plastic plates. (Variable costs referred to here are those that change in total as the units produced change. The costs include direct materials, direct labor, and unit-based variable overhead such as power and other machine costs.) Since the fixed expenses would not change, the new product was forecast to increase profits significantly (for the Atlanta plant). Two years after the addition of the new product line, the profits of the Atlanta plant (as well as other plants) had not improvedin fact, they had dropped. Upon investigation, the president of the company discovered that profits had not increased as expected because the so-called fixed cost pool had increased dramatically. The president interviewed the manager of each support department at the Atlanta plant. Typical responses from four of those managers are given next. Materials handling: The additional batches caused by the cups increased the demand for materials handling. We had to add one forklift and hire additional materials handling labor. Inspection: Inspecting cups is more complicated than plastic plates. We only inspect a sample drawn from every batch, but you need to understand that the number of batches has increased with this new product line. We had to hire more inspection labor. Purchasing: The new line increased the number of purchase orders. We had to use more resources to handle this increased volume. Accounting: There were more transactions to process than before. We had to increase our staff. Required: 1. Explain why the results of adding the new product line were not accurately projected. 2. Could this problem have been avoided with an activity-based cost management system? If so, would you recommend that the company adopt this type of system? Explain and discuss the differences between an activity-based cost management system and a traditional cost management system.arrow_forwardPaterson Company, a U.S.-based company, manufactures and sells electronic components worldwide. Virtually all its manufacturing takes place in the United States. The company has marketing divisions throughout Europe, including France. Debbie Kishimoto, manager of this division, was hired from a competitor 3 years ago. Debbie, recently informed of a price increase in one of the major product lines, requested a meeting with Jeff Phillips, marketing vice president. Their conversation follows. Debbie: Jeff, I simply dont understand why the price of our main product has increased from 5.00 to 5.50 per unit. We negotiated an agreement earlier in the year with our manufacturing division in Philadelphia for a price of 5.00 for the entire year. I called the manager of that division. He said that the original price was still acceptablethat the increase was a directive from headquarters. Thats why I wanted to meet with you. I need some explanations. When I was hired, I was told that pricing decisions were made by the divisions. This directive interferes with this decentralized philosophy and will lower my divisions profits. Given current market conditions, there is no way we can pass on the cost increase. Profits for my division will drop at least 600,000 if this price is maintained. I think a midyear increase of this magnitude is unfair to my division. Jeff: Under normal operating conditions, headquarters would not interfere with divisional decisions. But as a company, we are having some problems. What you just told me is exactly why the price of your product has been increased. We want the profits of all our European marketing divisions to drop. Debbie: What do you mean that you want the profits to drop? That doesnt make any sense. Arent we in business to make money? Jeff: Debbie, what you lack is corporate perspective. We are in business to make money, and thats why we want European profits to decrease. Our U.S. divisions are not doing well this year. Projections show significant losses. At the same time, projections for European operations show good profitability. By increasing the cost of key products transferred to Europeto your division, for examplewe increase revenues and profits in the United States. By decreasing your profits, we avoid paying taxes in France. With losses on other U.S. operations to offset the corresponding increase in domestic profits, we avoid paying taxes in the United States as well. The net effect is a much-needed increase in our cash flow. Besides, you know how hard it is in some of these European countries to transfer out capital. This is a clean way of doing it. Debbie: Im not so sure that its clean. I cant imagine the tax laws permitting this type of scheme. There is another problem, too. You know that the companys bonus plans are tied to a divisions profits. This plan could cost all of the European managers a lot of money. Jeff: Debbie, you have no reason to worry about the effect on your bonusor on our evaluation of your performance. Corporate management has already taken steps to ensure no loss of compensation. The plan is to compute what income would have been if the old price had prevailed and base bonuses on that figure. Ill meet with the other divisional managers and explain the situation to them as well. Debbie: The bonus adjustment seems fair, although I wonder if the reasons for the drop in profits will be remembered in a couple of years when Im being considered for promotion. Anyway, I still have some strong ethical concerns about this. How does this scheme relate to the tax laws? Jeff: We will be in technical compliance with the tax laws. In the United States, Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code governs this type of transaction. The key to this law, as well as most European laws, is evidence of an arms-length price. Since youre a distributor, we can use the resale price method to determine such a price. Essentially, the arms-length price for the transferred good is backed into by starting with the price at which you sell the product and then adjusting that price for the markup and other legitimate differences, such as tariffs and transportation. Debbie: If I were a French tax auditor, I would wonder why the markup dropped from last year to this year. Are we being good citizens and meeting the fiscal responsibilities imposed on us by each country in which we operate? Jeff: Well, a French tax auditor might wonder about the drop in markup. But, the markup is still within reason, and we can make a good argument for increased costs. In fact, weve already instructed the managers of our manufacturing divisions to legitimately reassign as many costs as they can to the European product lines. So far, they have been very successful. I think our records will support the increase that you are receiving. You really do not need to be concerned with the tax authorities. Our tax department assures me that this has been carefully researchedits unlikely that a tax audit will create any difficulties. Itll all be legal and above board. Weve done this several times in the past with total success. Required: 1. Do you think that the tax-minimization scheme described to Debbie Kishimoto is in harmony with the ethical behavior that should be displayed by top corporate executives? Why or why not? What would you do if you were Debbie? 2. Apparently, the tax department of Paterson Company has been strongly involved in developing the tax-minimization scheme. Assume that the accountants responsible for the decision are CMAs and members of the IMA, subject to the IMA standards of ethical conduct. Review the IMA standards for ethical conduct in Chapter 1. Are any of these standards being violated by the accountants in Patersons tax department? If so, identify them. What should these tax accountants do if requested to develop a questionable taxminimization scheme?arrow_forwardAsbury Coffee Enterprises (ACE) manufactures two models of coffee grinders: Personal and Commercial. The Personal grinders have a smaller capacity and are less durable than the Commercial grinders. ACE only recently began producing the Commercial model. Since the Introduction of the new product, profits have been steadily declining, although sales have been increasing. The management at ACE belleves that the problem might be in how the accounting system allocates costs to products. The current system at ACE allocates manufacturing overhead to products based on direct labor costs. For the most recent year, which Is representative, manufacturing overhead totaled $2,091,000 based on production of 30,000 Personal grinders and 10,000 Commercial grinders. Direct costs were as follows: Direct materials Direct labor Personal $ 1,448,200 1,034,000 Commercial $ 661,000 708,500 Total $ 2,109,200 1,742,500 Management has determined that overhead costs are caused by three cost drivers. These…arrow_forward
- Vikrambhaiarrow_forwardAlexandria Ltd. manufactures high-quality pens. For many years the company manufactured only one type of pen (namely, ballpoint pens) but last year the company also began to manufacture fountain pens. The decision to begin manufacturing fountain pens was taken only after the company’s marketing manager confirmed that there was a significant niche market for fountain pens and the company’s cost accountant estimated that the cost of production for such pens would be much less than the selling price predicted by the marketing manager. When the fountain pen was introduced, sales (in terms of both quantity and price) were higher than expected. Nevertheless the overall profits of Alexandria Ltd. have declined steadily. As a result, the cost accountant decided that he should re-examine his estimate of the cost of producing the fountain pen, with particular reference to overhead costs. In his original analysis, he allocated all manufacturing overhead costs to products in proportion to direct…arrow_forwardMunabhaiarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning