Concept explainers
a)
To determine: The productivity rate of Country U last year for the national economy.
Introduction: Operations management is defined as managing with concern with designing and redesigning the operation in the production of goods and services. It has the control over the business operations which convert the resource to goods and services.
b)
To determine: The productivity rate of Country U last year for the manufacturing sector.
Introduction: Operations management is defined as managing with concern with designing and redesigning the operation in the production of goods and services. It has the control over the business operations which convert the resource to goods and services.
c)
To determine: The productivity rate of Country U last year for the service sector.
Introduction: Operations management is defined as managing with concern with designing and redesigning the operation in the production of goods and services. It has the control over the business operations which convert the resource to goods and services.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Mazen is a manager in a factory producing fabrics. In 2020, the daily production target was met in terms of quality and quantity. But, this target was achieved as a result of an increased number of workers and import of high quantities of cotton and piles of leftovers, meaning an extra inputs' costs. He decided to make negotiations with local industries to sell them cotton remnants to be recycled and re-used in pillow manufacturing.The productivity of this factory is: * Effective and efficient Neither effective nor efficient Effective but not efficient O Not effective but efficientarrow_forwardhe manager of a crew that installs carpeting has tracked the crew’s output over the past several weeks, obtaining these figures: Week Crew Size Yards Installed 1 2 95 2 3 70 3 6 100 4 7 50 5 5 70 6 4 55 Click here for the Excel Data File a. Compute the labor productivity for each of the weeks. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) b. Which crew size works best?arrow_forwardA small electronic manufacturing company which makes communication devices has determined its costs as follows (all value data are expressed in millions Euro): Calculate and compare all single-factor and multifactor productivity for 2013 and 2014. What conclusions do you draw?arrow_forward
- P2a. Various financial data for the past two years follow. Calculate the productivity ratios and enter the % change (round to one decimal place) from last year to this year. Output: Inputs: Volume (# units) $ Price / unit Labor hours / unit Labor $ cost / hour Raw material $ cost/ unit Overhead Labor Productivity (round to one decimal place) Multifactor Productivity (round to one decimal place) Last Year This Year 35,000 $18.00 0.2 $24 $6.00 $40,000 50,000 $18.20 0.15 $24 $6.20 $50,000 % Changearrow_forwardTwo types of cars (Deluxe and Limited) were produced by a car manufacturer last year. Quantities sold, price per unit, and labor hours are given below. QUANTITY $/UNIT $ 9,050/car $10,550/car Deluxe car 3,625 units sold 6,525 units sold 22,750 hours 29,865 hours Limited car Labor, Deluxe Labor, Limited $ 12/hour $ 15/hour What is the labor productivity for each car? Provide two sets of figures: units per labor hour, and dollar of output per dollar of labor expense. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) Labor Productivity Units/hour Dollars Deluxe car Limited cararrow_forwardA factory produces 14,000 desk staplers each week. The equipment used costs $50,000 and will remain productive for four years. The labor cost per year is $190,000. a. What is the productivity measure of "units of output per dollar of input" averaged over the four-year period? Assume that there are 52 weeks per year. Round your answer to two decimal places. units of output per dollar input b. We have the option of buying $55,000 of new equipment, with an operating life of seven years. It would reduce labor costs to $124,000 per year. Should we consider purchasing this equipment (using productivity arguments alone)? Assume that there are 52 weeks per year. Round your answer for productivity to two decimal places. For the newer machine, the productivity is -Select-, it would be a-Select- investment. -Select- higher lower units of output per dollar input. Because the productivity of the new machine isarrow_forward
- In the Loans & Credits department of a TD Bank branch, there are 700 loan applications per week waiting to be processed. There are currently 8 employees (each works for 7 hours a day, 5 days a week) working in the department for processing the loan applications.( a ) What is the employee productivity (in applications/hour)?( b ) Due to the current economic situation, the director of the department anticipatesthat there will be a significant increase in the number of loan applications. If there are 1960 applications per week and the director wishes to increase the employee productivity to 3.5 applications per hour, how many additional employee should be hired?arrow_forwardOmar Industries maintains production facilities in several locations around the Average monthly cost data and output levels are as follows. Calculate the labor productivity of each facility. Calculate the multifactor productivity of each 3- If Omar needed to close one of the plants, which one would you choosearrow_forwardA major airline is attempting to evaluate the effect of recent changes it has made in scheduling flights between New York City and Los Angeles. Data available are shown below: Number of Number of Flights Passengers 13 8,575 Month prior to schedule change (January) Month after schedule change (June) 22 15,566 Using January as the base period, compute a productivity index for January and June. Round your answers to the nearest whole number. Productivity index January June Using passengers per flight as a productivity indicator, comment on the apparent effect of the schedule change. Use the rounded numbers of passengers obtained above for your calculations. Round your answer for productivity indicator to one decimal place. Productivity -Select- by percent after the schedule change. This could be due to -Select- convenient flight times, -Select- schedules or some other intervening variable.arrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning