You are required to use the IRAC model , in an essay format to answer all questions. Jill is a known prostitute, rented an apartment from Jacob. Jacob is unaware of Jill’s profession and gracefully rented the apartment which was unoccupied for the last year. Jacob saw several people coming and going from the apartment but was not concerned because he thought that they were all Jill’s friends. Indeed, Jacob was a private person who paid little attention to other people’s activities. He focused on his tasks and that of his family. Jill did not pay her rent for 3 months and Jacob sought to enforce the right to terminate the rental agreement and sue for the outstanding rent. Jill has indicated that she will not pay any outstanding rent and told Jacob that his contract with her was illegal bearing in mind that she was using the apartment for the illegal purpose of prostitution. Advise Jacob on this matter.

You are required to use the IRAC model , in an essay format to answer all questions. Jill is a known prostitute, rented an apartment from Jacob. Jacob is unaware of Jill’s profession and gracefully rented the apartment which was unoccupied for the last year. Jacob saw several people coming and going from the apartment but was not concerned because he thought that they were all Jill’s friends. Indeed, Jacob was a private person who paid little attention to other people’s activities. He focused on his tasks and that of his family. Jill did not pay her rent for 3 months and Jacob sought to enforce the right to terminate the rental agreement and sue for the outstanding rent. Jill has indicated that she will not pay any outstanding rent and told Jacob that his contract with her was illegal bearing in mind that she was using the apartment for the illegal purpose of prostitution. Advise Jacob on this matter.

Similar questions

Cybercrime can best be defined as:a) a crime against property.b) not a new type of crime but a new way of committing crime—in cyberspace.c) a crime that necessarily also involves a tort.d) organized crime
Can you please help me answer this?
You receive a subpoena to appear in court and to bring a specific medical record. You are scheduled to testify tomorrow. How will you prepare? What guidelines will you follow in testifying?
During an embezzlement trial, the plaintiff’s attorney is performing a direct examination of a witness. The attorney asks the witness, “What happened when you asked your supervisor what they knew about the incident?” The witness replies, “my supervisor said that Mr. Smith had embezzled money from the company.” Smith is the sole defendant in the case. Which of the following is the most accurate statement concerning the witness’s response? A. The witness’s response is hearsay, but it is admissible because a hearsay exception applies. B. The witness’s response is not hearsay, and it is admissible. C. The witness’s response is not hearsay, but it is inadmissible because it is unreliable. D. The witness’s response is inadmissible hearsay
Louisa, who is not a real estate license holder, owns three single-family residences, which she rents out. (She does not occupy any of the residences). Does she have to abide by the Fair Housing Act when selecting tenants? Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act, although she may not use discriminatory advertising. Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act under the Mrs. Murphy exemption. Louisa is not exempt from the Fair Housing Act. Louisa is not exempt under the Fair Housing Act, but she is exemptunder the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.
5. A radio station plays a commercial for Beefy's restaurant. The station created the commercial by loved Beefy's. The star didn't give permission for this commercial and has never even been to Beefy A. The radio station is guilty of appropriation B. The radio station is guilty of slandering the restaurant. C. The star is guilty of negligent misrepresentation, although not intentional misrepresentation. D. The radio station is guilty of negligence Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page) << Previous Question Next Su
You're going to have a party at your house. Your friends will bring their own alcohol and/or recreational drugs. What if one of your friends gets intoxicated, leaves your house, gets into their car, drives away, and then gets into an accident with another car, killing the driver and severely injuring the passenger in that car. Your friend had minor injuries. Did you (i.e. the host of the party) have a "duty of care" to the driver that died and the passenger that was injured? Please do some research (e.g. Canlii, Google) and find a Canadian legal case on this issue. Provide the name of the case, year and which court decided the case. Then provide a brief overview of the facts, the legal test for duty of care, and explain what the court decided.
Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest An application of the methods to the case A conclusions
As a VP for a service company in the Kansas City area, we ran trucks on both the Missouri and Kansas sides of the city. Kansas has a much higher tax on fuel than Missouri, so Jim instructed our drivers to fill up on the Missouri side when it was feasible to do so. Fuel tax goes to build and repair roads and bridges. We drive on roads in both Kansas and Missouri. Was Jim being unethical because Jim instructed our drivers to save on fuel expenses at the expense of the State of Kansas and its citizens?
A spring gun, capable of inflicting death or serious injury: O Blew away much of Katko's right arm. OIs the best way to defend unoccupied property. O Can only be used to protect an unoccupied boarded-up farmhouse. O Cannot be used to protect an unoccupied boarded-up farmhouse. O Cannot be used to protect a farmhouse unless it is unoccupied.
Wally is a world-famous LSU shoe quarterback who is known for his ability to quite literally throw away the game when it matters most. One day, during his rigorous shoe throwing exercbes, be negligently knocks an innocent civilian unconscious with a stray purple and gold cleat. Wally was promptly arrested and taken to jail to await trial. The judge assigned to his trial happened to be a passionate Gator fan who was excited about a potential national championship season for his beloved Florida football team, which Wally had spoiled a few years ago with yet another stray cleat. As a result of the judge's (understandable) resentment towards Wally's previous national championship sabotaging episode, the judge sentenced Wally to a lifetime in prison for his current crime. The judge's comically harsh sentence could be described by which of the following legal theories? O Legal Realism Utilitarianism Natural Law Egalitarianism O The Historical School
Laura is concerned about information and intellectual property in the business. She keeps personal details of trainees, and she has a large amount of training material that has been produced by her and her employees. She wants advice on the laws relating to data protection and intellectual property. Your report must: Analyse the requirements of data protection legislation. Explain how intellectual property can be protected.