Which of the following is the most significant difference in the principal's liability for an independent contractor versus the principal's liability for an employee? Group of answer choices The principal is liable for the authorized contracts of an employee and for those of an independent contractor The principal is liable for the authorized contracts of an independent contractor but not for those of an employee The principal is liable for the job-related torts of an employee but not for those of an independent contractor The principal is liable for the job-related torts of an independent contractor but not those of an employe

Which of the following is the most significant difference in the principal's liability for an independent contractor versus the principal's liability for an employee? Group of answer choices The principal is liable for the authorized contracts of an employee and for those of an independent contractor The principal is liable for the authorized contracts of an independent contractor but not for those of an employee The principal is liable for the job-related torts of an employee but not for those of an independent contractor The principal is liable for the job-related torts of an independent contractor but not those of an employe

Similar questions

What legal duty, if any, does the physician owe the person? Please explain in detail. Assuming that the physician has a legal duty towards the person, did the physician breach that legal duty? Please explain in detail. Assume that the physician knew that they were infected with a communicable disease and purposefully performed the CPR, although others at the scene could have performed it; what intentional tort(s), if any, has the physician committed against the person? List the tort(s.) What possible defense(s) does the physician have against a tort action by the person.
Which of the following is correct regarding comparative negligence? Comparative negligence is also known as contributory negligence. The harsh rule of comparative negligence is offset by the doctrine of contributory negligence. It increases the plaintiff's damage award by the percentage that the plaintiff contributed to her own harm (due to the plaintiff's own negligence). The plaintiff's contributory negligence does not necessarily bar her recovery of damages from the defendant. It bars the plaintiff from recovery if the plaintiff's own fault contributed to her injury
5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)
A tort is a breach of a contractual agreement Select one: True False Clear my choice O O
Discuss the concept of strict liability. Should this be applicable to businesses in product liability cases? Is this fair? What if a business is extremely cautious and yet a person is injured by the product? Why would it make sense to hold the business (who was not negligent) liable?
27. Vicarious liability refers to a situation where: the employer is held legally responsible for actions of its employees the employer serves alcohol at company-sponsored events the onus is on the employer to prove it was not negligent none of the above
Pacific Southern Airlines (PSA) had an unhappy customer. Cynthia Mercier-Walters flew from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Phoenix, Arizona. The flight stopped briefly at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where she got off the plane for half an hour. When she returned to her seat, her $400 prescription reading glasses were gone. She asked the flight attendant where the glasses were, and the attendant said they probably were thrown away since the cleaning crew had come in with big bags and tossed everything in them. Ms. Mercier-Walters tried to locate the glasses through the airline’s lost-and-found service, but she failed. Then she wrote a strong letter to the airline demanding reimbursement for the loss. She felt that it was obvious that she was returning to her seat. The airline, however, knows that an overwhelming number of passengers arriving at hubs switch planes for their connecting flights. The airline does not know who is returning. What’s more, flight attendants…
Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issue
The Penguin intentionally hits Batman with his umbrella. Batman, stunned by the blow, falls backwards, knocking Robin down. Robin’s leg is broken in the fall, and he cries out, “Holy broken bat bones! My leg is broken.” Who, if anyone, is liable to Robin? Why?
Business Tort of Negligence Dewayne, a driver for Speedy Delivery Company, leaves the truck's motor running in neutral and carelessly forgets to set the parking brake while making a delivery. The truck rolls and crashes into a nearby gas station pump, igniting a fire that spreads quickly to a construction site a block away. A burned wall collapses onto a crane, which falls on Fazio, a bystander, and injures him. What must Fazio show to recover damages from Speedy Delivery? If you are the attorney for Speedy Delivery what would be your best defense argument? Your paper should be between 500-750 words, with at least two cited external resources. View your assignment rubric. ROLK LOVE
Which of the following sorts of nuisance could lead to a tort claim a. Tolerable Nuisance b. Private Nuisance C. Puissance O d. Interpersonal Nuisance
To successfully win a negligence lawsuit, what are the "elements" the plaintiff must prove and what three affirmative defenses are available to the defendant?