You're going to have a party at your house. Your friends will bring their own alcohol and/orrecreational drugs. What if one of your friends gets intoxicated, leaves your house, gets into theircar, drives away, and then gets into an accident with another car, killing the driver and severelyinjuring the passenger in that car. Your friend had minor injuries. Did you (i.e. the host of theparty) have a "duty of care" to the driver that died and the passenger that was injured? Please dosome research (e.g. Canlii, Google) and find a Canadian legal case on this issue. Provide thename of the case, year and which court decided the case. Then provide a brief overview of thefacts, the legal test for duty of care, and explain what the court decided.

Determining whether a person, acting as the host, has a "duty of care" in this situation is a…

Answered: You're going to have a party at your…

Similar questions

Can legal gambling have any harmful effects? Describe a form of legal gambling that takes place and some of its harmful effects. If it is harmful why is it allowed in the first place? Is there a way to mitigate these harmful effects?
Debate the balance between effective law enforcement and personal liberty. Which of these two principles outweighs the other? Are there any situations in which personal freedoms should be limited to ensure that police are able to prevent crime or successfully apprehend offenders? Why or why not? Support your opinion.cite your source at the end and only use 5 sentences
5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)
Is felony murder the equivalent of hanging every 50th thief at random? Why or why not? Despite obvious concerns across most jurisdictions, why is felony murder continued?
Wally is a world-famous LSU shoe quarterback who is known for his ability to quite literally throw away the game when it matters most. One day, during his rigorous shoe throwing exercbes, be negligently knocks an innocent civilian unconscious with a stray purple and gold cleat. Wally was promptly arrested and taken to jail to await trial. The judge assigned to his trial happened to be a passionate Gator fan who was excited about a potential national championship season for his beloved Florida football team, which Wally had spoiled a few years ago with yet another stray cleat. As a result of the judge's (understandable) resentment towards Wally's previous national championship sabotaging episode, the judge sentenced Wally to a lifetime in prison for his current crime. The judge's comically harsh sentence could be described by which of the following legal theories? O Legal Realism Utilitarianism Natural Law Egalitarianism O The Historical School
1) A misdemeanor is a more serious crime than a felony. Why its false? 2) You accidentally take someone’s mink coat by mistake. You have committed theft. Why its false? 3) Robbery is the taking of property without force. Why its false? 4) If you find a signed and endorsed check, and you cash it, you have committed forgery. Why its false? 5) If you break into an apartment in order to escape a meteor shower, you have committed burglary. Why its false? 6) If a bank robber forces you, a bank customer, to kill a teller, and you do, you will be found innocent. Why its false? 7) If you buy a stolen 60-inch television out of the back of a truck at 2am for $15, you have committed no crime. Why its false? 8) If a person is a suspect in a crime, they mut cooperate fully with law enforcement and answer all questions. Why its false? 9) If you get drunk and then rob a bank, you will be found not guilty. Why its false? 10) A person is guilty of shoplifting if they take merchandise from one part of…
Give typed explanation Kawal, a young mother with three small children, had worked at the counter of a Tim Hortons store for three years. One day, the manager observed Kawal giving a Timbit donut to a crying child who came into the store with their parents. When the manager of the store confronted Kawal about giving a donut away for free, Kawal immediately admitted to giving the donut away to the customer without paying for it. She was aware that this was against the employer’s policy, but she had been busy at the time and did not go to her purse to get the $1.50 to pay for the donut at that time. Also, knowing that day-old donuts are given away to small children in the store regularly, she felt this would be acceptable. Kawal expected to get a warning at most and was shocked when her manager terminated her employment for cause. Sarah filed a wrongful dismissal case. (PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking for your opinion. Use concepts discussed in class or your textbook to provide an…
Nick had just finished his shift at work and was just about to drive home when he received a telephone call from his girlfriend. She sounded worried because she thought that someone was trying to break into their flat. Nick rushed home, driving at 45mph in a 30mph zone. When he pulled into the parking lot, Nick saw Bill running away from the building carrying what looked like a laptop. Nick chased after Bill and when he caught up with him, he punched him very hard, leaving him unconscious. Bill later recovered but spent some time in hospital receiving treatment for his injuries. Advise Nick of any criminal offences that he may have committed and any defences that he may have? Please consider the elements of the crimes committed. Nick is tried for his crime(s) in the Crown Court. Explain the role of the Crown Court in criminal proceedings including considering the role of the jury, any rights of appeal and the sentences that may be applied.
What is involuntary manslaughter? List each part of the definition separately. When you use the Internet to find the explanations, please provide the URL and explain why you think this is a good source of information
At what age do you feel a minor should have a voice in their medical care? What if the minor’s consent to treatment is different from the parent’s? As a healthcare provider what should or can you do in this situation to protect the best interest of your patient? Explain and support your answer.
Locate two scholarly articles on Agent Negligence, Intentional Torts, and Crimes: Employer Liability . Summarize the articles in your own words and explain how each is related to your topic. Do not use court cases in this section. You must use scholarly articles from the South University Online Library. Legal journals may provide some of the best sources of information
You are caught in the middle of a dilemma. You have been subpoenaed to be a witness in a work-related sexual harassment case involving your boss and a coworker. On more than one occasion, you heard your boss make statements to this employee that could be interpreted as sexual advances. Your boss has made it clear that he will make things difficult for you at work if you testify in favor of the employee. You could choose to testify in a manner that would make it appear that your boss was not serious and that the employee was overreacting. However, you truly thought that your boss was not joking with the employee and that he was harassing her. What kind of repercussions could there be if you testify in favor of your coworker? Would you be willing to risk those repercussions?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS