Two people, A and B, are deciding whether to put effort into producing a public good or not. Each person, i, can either choose no effort (s; = 0) or yes effort (s; 1). The total public good produced is G = max{SA, SB}. The cost of doing no effort is 0. The cost of doing yes effort is 1.5. The payoff to a player is the total public goods provided (G) minus her personal costs. = i. Given a choice by player B, SB, write down player A's utility from choosing no effort. Given a choice by player B, SB, write down player A?s utility from choosing yes effort.

Two people, A and B, are deciding whether to put effort into producing a public good or not. Each person, i, can either choose no effort (s; = 0) or yes effort (s; 1). The total public good produced is G = max{SA, SB}. The cost of doing no effort is 0. The cost of doing yes effort is 1.5. The payoff to a player is the total public goods provided (G) minus her personal costs. = i. Given a choice by player B, SB, write down player A's utility from choosing no effort. Given a choice by player B, SB, write down player A?s utility from choosing yes effort.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two individuals A and B have utility functions defined over two goods, a private good 'x') and a public good, 'F. The utility function of an agent 'i' is defined by ui = 2 log xi + log F where F =FA + FB. Each agent has 200 units of private goods x, as his endowment and 1 unit of private good can be transformed into 1 public good F. Answer the following (a) Find the Nash equilibrium values of FA and FB? (b) What is the Pareto optimal level of F? (c) In what condition the Pareto optimal level of F will not depend on the number of private goods? (d) What would be the consumption of x by each agent if they contribute equally towards the public good (F)? (e) Would it change if an agent had a larger endowment of x to begin with?
Please answer everything in the photos.
Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods: Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government issues tradable pollution permits. The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms. Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 80 550 75 Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 210 1,075 130 (Dollars) 130 700 90…
A small community has 20 people, each of whom has a wealth of $12,000. Each individual must choose whether to contribute $300 or $0 to the support of public entertainment for their community. The money value of the benefit that a person gets from this public entertainment is b times the total amount of money contributed by individuals in the community. Question 3 options: If 20b > 1, everybody is better off if all contribute to the public entertainment fund than if nobody contributes, but if 20b < 1, everybody is better off if nobody contributes than if all contribute Everybody is worse off if all contribute than if nobody contributes if b > 1, but if b < 1, everybody is better off if nobody contributes. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium in which nobody contributes anything for public entertainment. If 20b > 1, there is a dominant strategy equilibrium in which everybody contributes. In order for there to be a dominant strategy equilibrium in which all…
In experiments in which participants voluntarily contribute to the provision of a public good, we often find a reduction in contributions in successive rounds of the experiment. We can explain this as Group of answer choices Evidence of participants reaching satiation and not wanting such high levels of the public good. Evidence of participants working out the Nash equilibrium outcome of the voluntary contribution game. Evidence of participants reducing cooperation to punish free riding. Evidence of participants learning how to play the game more effectively.
parts a and b
parts c and d
Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods: Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government issues tradable pollution permits. The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms. Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 130 600 90 Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) 165 220 750 1,200 115 140
Brian and Edison are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the public park or to keep that $400 for a cell phone. Since a public park is a public good, both Brian and Edison will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Brian and Edison choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the public park. So, Brian and Edison would each receive $640 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Brian chooses to spend $400 on a cell phone, Brian would get $400 of benefit from the cell phone and Edison wouldn't receive any benefit from Brian's choice. If Brian still spends $400 on a cell phone and Edison chooses to contribute $400 to the…
We have three buyers who value a good at $45. There are three possible sellers A, B, C whose marginal costs of production are $20, $30 and $50.Assuming all benefits (and costs) accrue to the buyers (and sellers) what is total surplus created if the buyers and sellers interact in a market? Do not enter the $sign. Notice that you have enough information to only compute surplus for integer values of the good so I should not have to say–assume integer values for good–you should know it.