Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution inthe area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following twomethods:Methods to Reduce Pollution1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation.2. The government issues tradable pollution permits.The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the costfaced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) isprohibitively expensive for all three firms.FirmFirm AFirm BFirm CFirst Unit of Pollution(Dollars)8055075Cost of Eliminating the...Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution(Dollars)2101,075130(Dollars)13070090Next, suppose that two government officials proposed alternative plans that would reduce pollution by 6 units. Method 2: Tradable PermitsMeanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 12 units to6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, it can emit1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on a price.For example, if firm A agrees to sell a permit to firm B at an agreed-upon price, then firm B would end up with three permits and would need toreduce its pollution by only 1 unit while firm A would end up with only one permit and would have to reduce its pollution by 3 units. Assume thenegotiation and exchange of permits are costless.Because firm B has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm C and a permit from firm A so that itdoesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. At which of the following prices are both firm C and firm A willing to sell one of their permits tofirm B? Check all that apply.$124$166O $200$364O $475FirmFirm AFirm BFirm CSuppose the the government has set the trading price of a permit at $147 per permit.Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount itcosts each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of theother firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.)Initial Pollution PermitAllocation(Units of pollution)222ActionFinal Amount of PollutionEliminated(Units of pollution)Cost of PollutionReduction(Dollars)

An abatement cost is a cost borne by firms when they are required to remove and/or reduce negative…

Because firm B has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm C and a permit from firm A so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. At which of the following prices are both firm C and firm A willing to sell one of their permits to firm B? Check all that apply. ооооо $124 $166 $200 $364 O $475

Because firm B has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm C and a permit from firm A so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. At which of the following prices are both firm C and firm A willing to sell one of their permits to firm B? Check all that apply. ооооо $124 $166 $200 $364 O $475

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are two firms, A and B emitting sulfur dioxide. In total, they emit 100 tons of sulfur dioxide. The EPA wants to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by 60 tons so that the final level of emissions in only 40 tons. The table below shows the emissions and cost of abatement for each firm. If the EPA were to issue 40 tradeable pollution permits, 20 to each firm, where each pollution permit allows 1 ton of emission, what would the final allocation of permits across the two firms be if they traded permits with esch other? sO, Emission Cost per ton of so, reduction Company Firm A 30 tons $1,000 per ton Firm B 70 tons $800 per ton Total Emissions 100 tons Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arow keys to select an answer. a Each firm will have 20 permits. b. Firm A will have all 40 permits. Firm A will have 30 permits and Firm B will have 10 permits. Firm A will have 10 permits and Firm B will have 30 permits.
3. Suppose the EPA wants to reduce pollution to the socially optimal level. Based on the data in the table below, what is the optimal level of pollution? Total cleanup Total Total (tons) Benefit Cost 50 2 85 18 3 115 28 4 140 39 5 160 51 179 63 7 197 76 8 214 90 230 105 10 245 120 11 259 137 12 273 156 13 286 177 14 299 200 15 311 225
ЕOC 11.04 Consider two car factories, one run by Ford and the other run by Honda, that both create pollution. The government wants to reduce how much these two factories pollute by 40 tons, so only allow factories to pollute if they have a permit. Each factory is given 20 pollution permits. A business can use a permit to emit one ton of pollution or they can sell it to another business (and lose the ability to pollute). To lower pollution it costs Ford $200 per ton of pollutant removed and it costs Honda $100 per ton removed. After Ford and Honda have met to trade their permits with each other, what we expect to happen? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. Honda emits 20 tons of pollutants and Ford emits 20 tons of pollutants. a Honda no longer pollutes and Ford does not lower how much it produces. Honda increases its pollution and Ford lowers its pollution. Ford no longer pollutes and Honda does not lower how much it…
A profit-maximizing firm operating two factories currently emits 10 tons of pollution. Marginal private benefit of each ton emitted at each factory is listed in the table below. If it must reduce pollution by 6 tons, how many tons would it continue to emit from Factory B? Marginal Private Benefit Factory B $14 $12 $9 Factory A $20 Ton $18 $15 $11 $7 3 4 $6 $3
5. The marginal benefits (MB) and marginal damage costs (MD) for daily particulate air pollution in East St. Louis, Illinois are given in the following figure: $ per pound per day 2 MB MD 1 Pounds 1,000 2,000 per day a. What is the efficient level of pollution in pounds per day? Explain. b. If East St. Louis imposes an absolute ban on particulate pollution, how large would be the deadweight loss? (Be quantitative.) c. If instead of an absolute ban, the city levels a Pigouvian tax on polluters, how large should it be per pound per day to achieve efficiency? What will be the total revenues to the government? What will be the gain or loss to residents compared to the absolute ban? What will be the after tax gain or loss to polluters compared to the absolute ban? d. If instead of an absolute ban, the right to be free of pollution is given to the residents and they are allowed to bargain with the polluters, what level of pollution will Coase expect to be bargained between polluters and…
QUESTION 10 Suppose that a firm in a competitive market produces electricity by burning coal. The production process creates a negative externality of air pollution. The firm only cares about its private benefits and costs so it will produce a quantity where O the price of electricity it is paid equals the marginal private cost of producing electricity O the marginal value of electricity to society equals the marginal social cost to society the cost of the externality is maximized O the transaction costs of private bargaining are minimized
PRICE (Dollars per ton) 70 63 56 49 42 35 28 + 21 T 14 7 0 Demand +++ 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 QUANTITY (Millions of tons) Graph Input Tool Daily Demand for Pollution Rights Price (Dollars per ton) Quantity Demanded (Millions of tons) 7 360 Suppose the government has determined that the socially optimal quantity of particulate matter is 120 million tons per day. One way governments can charge firms for pollution rights is by imposing a per-unit tax on emissions. A tax (or price in this case) of $ of particulate matter emitted will achieve the desired level of pollution. ? per ton Now suppose the U.S. government does not know the demand curve for pollution and, therefore, cannot determine the optimal tax to achieve the desired level of pollution. Instead, it auctions off tradable pollution permits. Each permit entitles its owner to emit one ton of particulate matter per day. To achieve the socially optimal quantity of pollution, the government auctions off 120 million…
urco Use the chart below to answer the following question. The Socially Optimal Quantity of Pollution Select one: O a. $83 O b. $250 O c. $500 O d. $167 Marginal social cost, marginal social benefit $500 250 167 0 MSC MSB 83 125 Quantity of pollution The chart above shows the marginal social cost (MSC) and marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution. Using the information provided in the figure, we can conclude the optimal Pigouvian tax per unit of pollution is:
Quantity Marginal of Total Cost of Pollution Cost Reduction Reduction 1 20 20 50 30 3 110 60 200 90 5 380 180 6 660 280 Use the cost information from the table for a firm creates pollution. If there is a pollution charge of $45 per unit, how much will the firm reduce its pollution? O 1 4 3.
5. Which of the following best describes the issuance of permits to pollute as a way of influencing the amount of pollution? Permits to pollute: a. encourage business to pollute.b. should be purchased by those whose pollution is the least expensive to eliminate.c. should be purchased by those whose pollution is the most expensive to eliminate.d. are preferable over taxes because they can be limited to exactly the efficient amount of pollution.
Consider the following graph that shows the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve for a coal power plan for reducing local air pollution and the marginal damage (MD) curve for those living around the coal power plant. MD (E) MAC (E b. Emissions E-0 E EL E-Max AMax Or Abatement E A-0 What are the total abatement costs at E' (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as "a+b+c+d+e+f", without the quotation marks. What are the total abatement costs at E-0 (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as as "a+b+c+d+c+f", without the quotation marks. If the property rights were with the coal power plant how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following, "E-0", "E", "E1", "E-Max") If the property rights were with the people how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following. "E-0", "E", "E1 "E-Max") What is the socially optimal level of emissions (choose from one of the following and enter as written without the quotation marks, "E-0". "E"E1 "E-Max").
Suppose that a firm’s emissions and Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) data are summarized in thetable below. e MAC 0 200 10 180 20 160 30 140 40 120 50 100 60 80 70 60 80 40 90 20 100 0 a. If the price of a pollution permit is $100, how many permits will the firm need? Explain.b. Suppose that the price of a pollution permit increases to $120, how many permits will thefirm need? Explain.c. With this new price of $120, will the firm’s emissions increase or decrease? By howmuch? Explain.d. Can the firm sell any permits? If so, what is the revenue generated from permit sales?Explain.