Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in thearea, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following twomethods:Available Methods to Reduce Pollution1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation.2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits.Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces toeliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) isprohibitively expensive.Cost of Eliminating the...First Unit of PollutionSecond Unit of PollutionThird Unit of PollutionFirm(Dollars)(Dollars)(Dollars)Firm X80100150Firm Y4508001,050Firm Z95120200Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units.Method 1: RegulationThe first government employee suggests limiting pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to reduceits pollution by 2 units. Suppose the the government has set the trading price of a permit at $182 per permit.Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount itcosts each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of theother firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.)Initial Pollution PermitFinal Amount of PollutionAllocationCost of PollutionEliminatedReductionFirm(Units of pollution)Action(Units of pollution)(Dollars)FirmFirmYFirm ZRegulation Versus Tradable PermitsDetermine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might needto get information from previous tasks to complete this table.)Total Cost of Eliminating Six Units of PollutionProposed Method(Dollars)RegulationTradable Permitscostly to society when the government regulates each firm to eliminate aIn this case, you can conclude that eliminating pollution iscertain amount of pollution than when it allocates pollution permits that can be bought and sold.2.2.

Using the 1st method: that is if the govt tries to regulate each firm so that they produce only 2…

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please drag and drop the markers 1 through 5 below to denote the appropriate position on the diagram that answers the question. a) Show with marker 1 the efficient level of marginal abatement costs. b) Show with marker 2 the marginal abatement costs if each produce must reduce pollution to 7.5 units. c) Denote with marker 3 the area that measures total abatement costs for each polluter. d) Show with marker 4 the marginal abatement costs if sources 1 and 2 merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. e) Show with marker 5 the total abatement costs if both sources merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. Marginal Cost (in dollars) MC MC, Quantity of Emissions Reduced A Source 1 10 5 4 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 O Source 2 5
Im confused on this question.
Suppose the the government has set the trading price of a permit at $126 per permit. Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C Initial Pollution Permit Allocation (Units of pollution) 2 2 2 Regulation Versus Tradable Permits Action Proposed Method Regulation Tradable Permits Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated (Units of pollution) Cost of Pollution Reduction (Dollars) Determine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might need to get information from previous tasks to complete this table.) Total Cost of Eliminating…
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Firm X 130 165 220…
two types of consumers( workers an retirees) share a community with a polluting cheese factory. the polution is nonrival and nonexcludable. the total damage to workers is p2 where p is the amount of pollution and the total damage to retirees is 3p2 . thus marginal damage to workers is 2p and marginal damage to retirees is 6p. according to an anlaysis by consulting engineers, the cheese factory saves 20p-p2 by pollluting p, for a marginal savings of 20-2p. a.Find the aggregate(including both types of sonsumers) marginal damage for the public bad. b..graph the marginal savings and aggregate marginal damage curves with pollution on the horizontal axis. c. how much will the cheese factory pollute in the abscence of any regulation or bargaining? what is the societys optimal level of pollution? d. starting from the uncontrolled level of pollution calculated in part(c), find the marginal willingness to pay for pollution abatment, A, for each consumer class. (abatment is the reduction in…
Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost MCLA = (1/2)aL and older firms with dirtier MCHA = aH, where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L, H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA= 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry. To design an efficient emissions standard, the government needs to determine which is the efficient abatement allocation (aL, aH). In order to do this, obtain a cost effective abatement allocation (aL, aH)that provides an aggregate abatement level A = aL + aH, and then proceed to determine the efficient level A (Hint: You should obtain that MCA = A=3)
Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods: Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government issues tradable pollution permits. The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms. Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 80 550 75 Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 210 1,075 130 (Dollars) 130 700 90…
Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost MCLA = (1/2)aL and older firms with dirtier MCHA = aH, where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L, H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA= 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry. Suppose that in order to avoid the costly obtention of disaggregate information about individual firms' costs, the government just implements a uniform standard aui = A* / 2. Is this allocation efficient? If not, what is the deadweight loss?
No hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.
See below for three parts of Scenario 2 Scenario 2A. There are three firms, A;B; and C that produce electricity. The first two firms have the same per-megawatt cost of production equal to $2, while firm C has a per-megawatt cost of $1. The firms differ, however, in their pollution. Firms A;B; and C produce respectively 1, 2, and 3 cubic feet of carbon monoxide per megawatt produced. A cubic foot of carbon monoxide pollutes the environment, and has a social cost of $2.5. The demand for electricity is represented by the inverse demand function P (Mw) =100 - Mw, where Mw represents the megawatts consumed by the public. Suppose firms are not held accountable for the pollution they produce. Scenario 2B. Suppose now that the government can measure the amount of pollution issued by each firm, and suppose that the government constrains each firm to emit no more than 9 cubic feet of carbon monoxide. Scenario 2C Suppose that government allows firms to trade their permits to emit carbon…
Suppose the government aims to abate 20 tons of pollution from two firms. Firm 1's abatement cost function is MAC1 = A1, firm 2's abatement function is MAC2 = 4A2, where A1 and A2 represent the amount of abatement conducted by firm 1 and firm 2 individually. How many tons should firm 1 and firm 2 abate to minimize total abatement cost? Blank #1: Firm 1's amount of abatement Blank #2 : Firm 2's amount of abatement
Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost MCLA = (1/2)aL and older firms with dirtier MCHA = aH, where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L, H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA= 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry. What Pigouvian tax t will implement the efficient allocation (aL, aH)? Is the resulting allocation an efficient allocation? What is the government's tax revenue?