There are two firms, A and B emitting sulfur dioxide. In total, they emit100 tons of sulfur dioxide. The EPA wants to reduce sulfur dioxideemissions by 60 tons so that the final level of emissions in only 40 tons.The table below shows the emissions and cost of abatement for eachfirm.If the EPA were to issue 40 tradeable pollution permits, 20 to each firm,where each pollution permit allows 1 ton of emission, what would thefinal allocation of permits across the two firms be if they traded permitswith each other?AEach firm will have 20 permits.BFirm A will have all 40 permits.CFirm A will have 30 permits and Firm B will have 10 permits.DFirm A will have 10 permits and Firm B will have 30 permits.CompanySO2 EmissionCost per ton ofSO₂ reductionFirm AFirm BTotal Emissions30 tons$1,000 per ton70 tons100 tons$800 per tonSubmit

Approach to solving the question: To comprehensively tackle the problem of allocating pollution…

Answered: There are two firms, A and B emitting…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You have the following supply and demand curves for an industry: QSX = -100 + 3 * PX for PX >= $40 QDX = 300 – 2 * PX However, this industry causes pollution damage to third parties. Each quantity produced creates pollution that causes equal damage, such that the marginal external cost is a constant $20 per unit (MEC= $20). a) Calculate the price quantity combinations for both the perfectly competitive and the efficient solution. Graphically show both solutions as well. Make sure you label all curves and axes. b) What efficient tax would move the competitive market to the efficient solution?
The table below shows the supply and demand conditions for a furniture factory that pollutes the air. The third column (Qs1) represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column (Qs2) represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Price QD Qs1 Qs2 $10 450 400 250 $15 440 440 290 $25 430 480 330 $30 420 520 370 $35 410 560 410 Answer the following: a) What is the negative externality in this situation? b) Identify the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity when we account only for private costs. c) Identify the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity when we account for the social costs. d) How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity? JUSTIFY your answer!
Can you explain why the following statement is false? The efficient level of a pollution-emitting activity (e.g., production of a good) is that at which the marginal external cost of pollution is equal to zero.
The table below shows the supply and demand conditions for a firm that will play trumpets on the streets when requested. Qs1 is the quantity supplied without social costs. Qs2 is the quantity supplied with social costs. How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity? Price Qd Qs1 Qs2 $20 0 10 8 $18 1 9 7 $15 2.5 7.5 5.5 $12 4 6 4 $10 5 5 3 $5 7.5 2.5 0.5
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 11 - 2E_1 MAC_2 = 8.5 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit subsidy to abatement equal to $____. Answer:
None
The table below shows current carbon emissions and the cost of reducing carbon emissions for three industrial firms. The government introduces a cap-and-trade policy to regulate carbon emissions. The total cap on emissions is 180 tonnes of carbon, and each firm receives an initial allocation of tradable permits for 60 tonnes of carbon emissions. Current carbon emissions Firm A B C (tonnes) 80 100 70 a. Firm A will buy 40 emission ✓ Firm C. Cost of reducing emissions by 1 ton ($) 150 200 50 Firm B will sell 20 emissior Firm C. Instructions: Round your answer to the nearest whole number. b. To break even, the selling firm must receive $ 150
There are three industrial firms in a town Firm Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit A 30 units $20 40 units 20 units B с $30 $10 The government wants to reduce pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits. 1. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? 2. How much higher would the costs of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 12-2E_1 MAC_2=9-E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from aggregate emissions from the two firms (E_Agg) is: MED = E_Agg. Total external damages at the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions is Answer: 1
The figure below shows the marginal benefit (demand) of polluting for two firms: Alpha and Beta. Before the introduction of a pollution tax, pollution is free, that is, MC = $0 per ton of emissions. Marginal Benefit (MB) to Firm Tax = $100 0 MB BETA MBALPHA 25 50 75 100 Emissions (tons) The government decides to impose a tax on pollution of $100 per ton of emissions. That is, the per-unit the tax is the marginal cost of polluting. Which of the follow are true? (Select all that are true.) a. As a result of the tax, the total emissions will decrease by 50 units b. The tax was intended to decrease production by 50 units for each firm. c. As a result of the tax, both firms will decrease emissions by the same amount d. After the tax is imposed, Firm Beta will emit 50 tons more pollution than Firm Alpha e. Before the tax is imposed, Firm Beta emitted more pollution than Firm Alpha f. As a result of the tax, total emissions from the two firms will be cut in half g. The amount of tax collected…
Im confused on this question.
None

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS